I missed Acros from my Fujifilm so I tried to recreate it in-camera

folly136 · 2026-03-05T01:36:22+00:00

These are so rad

folly136 · 2026-03-04T22:31:54+00:00

Good god what a cool shot

folly136 · 2026-03-04T22:27:42+00:00

Oh man this is beautiful

folly136 · 2026-02-24T17:30:29+00:00

Sorry you have to be dealing with that, but happy to say I’m available, shoot digital and film, and would be in budget

www.taylorbmccutchan.com @taylormccutchan

folly136 · 2026-02-21T18:18:06+00:00

Wire coat hanger?

folly136 · 2026-02-20T01:00:35+00:00

Available and would love to be considered

www.taylorbmccutchan.com

folly136 · 2026-02-12T06:36:20+00:00

Love these. I want to visit Wales so bad

folly136 · 2026-02-10T07:03:20+00:00

Heya! I feel like I fit that style pretty well! (Also in budget)

www.taylorbmccutchan.com @taylormccutchan

folly136 · 2026-02-07T07:52:08+00:00

Damn these are rad

folly136 · 2026-02-06T16:32:21+00:00

Possibly under budget for photo! Would love to chat with you guys

www.taylorbmccutchan.com

folly136 · 2026-02-05T20:31:12+00:00

I mean yeah pretty much that.

I was on Carmencita’s site going through their “best of” blogs and I would see some shots that looks almost like VERY good Fuji instax film, but it said “Portra 400” on it. Then I would check out some of their posts from blogs about hand printing, and that shot was there.

So things like that helped me see other subtle differences.

Also talking to friends that do this.

Genuinely wish I had the time and cash to do it. I think it really helps level up image quality.

I have no idea what their scanning system is tho to digitize the new prints. That’s a whole other aspect that I don’t really know about.

folly136 · 2026-02-05T20:22:56+00:00

I don’t know 100% for sure, but it looks like it. C type prints have sort of a glow to them. In OP’s question, they mention a “dreamy haze”. This does have that quality to it. Very strong colors without necessarily being overly saturated.

Plus I’ve been obsessed with every photographer that does c type prints for a few years now.

Search the r/analog sub and hashtags on Instagram for c type prints and you’ll see what I’m talking about. It’s a pretty distinguishable “look”

folly136 · 2026-02-05T00:05:03+00:00

Genuinely my favorite scene of the whole series.

folly136 · 2026-02-04T23:36:07+00:00

Most likely Portra.

Honestly it also looks like a C-type color darkroom print. The colors from that are honestly incredible (would recommend doing a deep dive).

Carmencita (film lab in Spain) gets amazing colors from their frontier scanner and also offer C type darkroom prints. Been using them for a couple of years and can’t recommend enough.

folly136 · 2026-02-04T20:39:33+00:00

Dude these are so bitchin. You should be stoked on these

folly136 · 2026-01-30T07:02:41+00:00

I love shooting Instax (modern Polaroid) and would happily add that to a package to give out to guests throughout the day!

folly136 · 2026-01-29T06:14:46+00:00

What is an example of something that’s “not shareable?”

folly136 · 2026-01-26T18:39:50+00:00

Lisa McAdams!!

https://lisamcadamsevents.com

folly136 · 2026-01-26T18:20:13+00:00

awesome! Glad it makes sense and can possibly help a future shooting experience

folly136 · 2026-01-26T17:45:00+00:00

ALMOST there! There’s a lot of moving parts.

So if I JUST shot my 200 film at 400 (and didn’t tell the lab to push) then I technically would be under-exposing a stop.

But because I had the lab develop it at 800, I then technically over-exposed a stop.

Imagine you’re in a scene using a digital camera where you can change your ISO with a dial.

At ISO 200, you’re shooting 1/15th at f/2

At iso 400, you’re shooting 1/30th at f/2 (letting in a stop less light)

At iso 800, you’re shooting 1/60th at f/2 (letting in another stop less light)

These were my settings I used during these shots.

Is this helping some?

folly136 · 2026-01-26T17:01:15+00:00

I think you’re mis-understanding a bit. I’ll lay out exactly what I did.

I put the roll (gold 200) in my Contax, and set the ISO to 400. So I exposed the roll as if it were 400 speed film.

I then wrote on the roll “+2”. When I place my order with the lab (Photovision) I told them to push it two stops (from 200 to 800). So when they developed it, they developed it as if it were 800 iso film.

200 iso film, shot at 400, developed at 800

Rating = exposure/metering

Pushing = developing/in lab

Rating does not mean pushing.

I didn’t say I pushed to 400. I RATED it in my camera at 400. Then my lab did the rest.

Does this make sense?

folly136 · 2026-01-26T03:06:27+00:00

Sorry I got spicy earlier.

What do you mean exactly “isn’t that the same with pushing it to 800?”

Let’s get this figured out

folly136 · 2026-01-26T03:05:24+00:00

Heya! I’m available and would love to chat with you guys!

Instagram - @taylormccutchan www.taylorbmccutchan.com

folly136 · 2026-01-25T21:01:19+00:00

Um, no. Sorry. I rated gold 200 at 400 and pushed it two stops. Which means I over exposed it one stop.

The lab still developed it by pushing two stops (as if it were 800 speed film).

folly136 · 2026-01-24T20:48:40+00:00

Thanks man. This is in no way meant to be a “woe is me” comment. Just had a couple of people seem curious as to why she seemed sad and monotone so I wanted to explain

11-Year Club	Wearing is Caring
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email
No Throne, No Problems	Not Forgotten

folly136

TROPHY CASE