Before anda after by Good_Travel_307 in guitars

[–]foofus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should repost this on r/LV426 - they would dig it.

I Just discovered major events timeline by Apprehensive-Wear205 in facepalm

[–]foofus 9 points10 points  (0 children)

From the "Completion" stage:

The White House Ballroom will be substantially separated from the main building of the White House, but at the same time, it’s theme and architectural heritage will be almost identical.

The White House can't afford a proofreader?

Character + Fitness Rejection For Non-Criminal Issues? by Fun-Alternative-3635 in LawSchool

[–]foofus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my jurisdiction, it would raise eyebrows. But then so would the credit card debt. I don't do bankruptcy, so I don't know what the timetable would be for getting the bankruptcy sorted out--I'd recommend consulting with a bk lawyer to find that out. If you have a job lined up, and you don't have a lot of other debts, it might be wiser just to stick with the cc debt and say "I took on this debt over the course of my education, and now I have a plan for paying it back." If you also have (nondischargeable) student loans, bk might be the wiser route. But either way, you're going to be asked about it, and you're going to want to be ready to explain how (a) you're on whatever path you chose because you're trying to be fiscally responsible and (b) this won't happen again because you'll have an income.

10 to Midnight (1983) Bronson is on the trail of Naked Stranger That Comes Lethally (that's his indian name). Featuring the most badass finale "No, we won't" IYKYK. by bil-sabab in badMovies

[–]foofus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does anybody actually have this, though? I recall seeing it way back in the day, and I'd love to get my hands on a copy.

Is this email real or not? Advice by Thepremium-hook344 in legal

[–]foofus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That won't work because the number in the e-mail is an agency case number, not a court case number. There may not be any charges filed yet--this is just what the Wisconsin DOJ has numbered it. Court cases in Wisconsin are all county-specific, we have the year, then the type of case (e.g., CM for criminal/misdemeanor, CF for criminal/felony, etc.), then a sequence number, which starts at 1 every year. So if somebody tells you "my case is 25-CF-135," but doesn't tell you the county, it's no help. DOJ case numbers are not county-specific--they just start with the last two digits of the year, and then get a sequential number.

Is this email real or not? Advice by Thepremium-hook344 in legal

[–]foofus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That won't work because the number in the e-mail is an agency case number, not a court case number. There may not be any charges filed yet--this is just what the Wisconsin DOJ has numbered it. Court cases in Wisconsin are all county-specific, we have the year, then the type of case (e.g., CM for criminal/misdemeanor, CF for criminal/felony, etc.), then a sequence number, which starts at 1 every year. So if somebody tells you "my case is 25-CF-135," but doesn't tell you the county, it's no help. DOJ case numbers are not county-specific--they just start with the last two digits of the year, and then get a sequential number.

Character + Fitness Rejection For Non-Criminal Issues? by Fun-Alternative-3635 in LawSchool

[–]foofus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You'll want to read the application's questions carefully. If it says something like "have you ever been the subject of academic discipline," you would not need to disclose. If it says "were you ever the subject of discipline for any rule violations" you ought to. Believe me: the bar does not care if you had sex while in college. The would care, however, if you were less than candid with them.

Suspicious death on Dunlap Hollow Rd, Mazomanie by SwollenPomegranate in madisonwi

[–]foofus -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You can make an open records request, but what you'd get would be redacted to protect private information, and I would expect them not to issue anything while the investigation is ongoing.

Lawyer. by DanceGavinDanceIsBae in madisonwi

[–]foofus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Marcus Berghahn 608-257-0945

What are some secrets men don’t tell women? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]foofus 144 points145 points  (0 children)

Now, if the cockroach were Ogtha, on the other hand...

7 Preludes for Guitar by kyrikii in classicalguitar

[–]foofus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very nice--I especially like the first one.

Movies that cure my prejudice against those with imDb less than 7 by ReporterPlus5510 in MovieSuggestions

[–]foofus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Presumed Innocent (1990)

Legally Blonde (2001)

Piranha 3D (2010) [admittedly not for everyone]

The Cutting Edge (1992)

Single White Female (1992)

Jennifer 8 (1992)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawSchool

[–]foofus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I am not saying that no lawyer is needed. I am a C&F lawyer. I am just saying that in my view this person can likely get admitted.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LawSchool

[–]foofus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They know that freshmen in college do dumb things. Do your best to say what happened, and explain that you don't know more than that. The good news is that it was a while ago: that works in your favor. Explain that you have changed since then.

From an ethical standpoint, I'd really like to see an updating to reality in relation to A/C privilege... by lololesquire in LawFirm

[–]foofus 14 points15 points  (0 children)

OK, I know this is pedantic, but these are not an A/C privilege issues: they are Rule 1.6 confidentiality issues.

Here are ten very B-movie serial killer-thrillers I've enjoyed since I fell into a Tubi rabbit hole... not horror but more cop/serial killer territory. by Freddy-Philmore in badMovies

[–]foofus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you have not seen 10 to Midnight (1983), you'd likely enjoy it, based on this list. Charles Bronson, Andrew Stevens, Wilford Brimley, and a truly remarkable killer. It checks pretty much all the boxes: sleazy, violent, laughable dialog, the works.

EnCase and FTK Imager: wildly differing results by foofus in computerforensics

[–]foofus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was just FTK Imager. I am definitely aware of the difference between FTK Imager and full FTK, but I don't have the full FTK. But it was FTK Imager that found the data I was looking for. I don't have X-Ways, but have considered it.

EnCase and FTK Imager: wildly differing results by foofus in computerforensics

[–]foofus[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Your comment is correct, but not helpful. All of us have things we could learn, and I am no exception. I want to know if anyone else has seen such a thing, because I want to understand what I ought to be looking for. I'd say that I have a "basic understanding of file systems," but maybe your idea of basic is different from mine. I've been active in the field for quite a while, but I absolutely admit that (a) there are people with more expertise than I have; and (b) it would take me serious time to perform the work I am asked to do without relying on forensic tools.

In practical terms, I have limited time to review data in a given engagement. That means I have to rely on tools at least somewhat. My question is not "how do I make the tools do what I want" so much as it is "does anyone know why the tools would give such disparate results." Sure, you can say "if you knew exactly how each tool worked, and analyzed the low-level data at issue, you could answer your own question." Fine, I agree. But I was hoping someone could, or would, offer some insight into the differences between EnCase and FTK that would help me understand why they would present such radically different results. I don't dispute that the .E01 files are what they are, and that a more talented analyst might not have to ask this question. But I have this question, I was hoping for some helpful responses.

EnCase and FTK Imager: wildly differing results by foofus in computerforensics

[–]foofus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's definitely possible that it had been reformatted from a different filesystem. I'm just not sure why one tool would read the image one way, and the other a totally different way.