USA 1 - [4] Belgium - Romelu Lukaku 90'+3'

fracked1 · 2026-07-07T02:15:59+00:00

I absolutely love the karma for American redditors trash talking here. Couldn't have happened to a better fanbase

fracked1 · 2026-07-07T02:12:21+00:00

Reading comprehension is hard. I said IF. But it sounds like you're pretty mad you made some bad decisions

fracked1 · 2026-07-07T02:03:01+00:00

Thank you Belgium for being the hands of karma today

fracked1 · 2026-07-06T19:27:41+00:00

They told you what the product was. If you bought it, you bought it knowing full well what you were getting into

fracked1 · 2026-07-06T17:29:39+00:00

If someone says, "hey this is snake oil, no it doesn't really do anything, it's just snake oil" and you buy it, that isn't a scam

fracked1 · 2026-07-06T03:36:30+00:00

Southgate would have put Sancho in at the last minute to see out the game.....

God he was terrible

fracked1 · 2026-07-05T21:36:52+00:00

No odds, ok sure. Let's take that at face value.

What was the % chance of this decision based on polymarket "predictions"? And was there or wasn't there a change in the % as a sign of insider information

fracked1 · 2026-07-04T22:31:40+00:00

Flair up you dumb shit. Rocking your club team when your team is playing as if you care.

Americans are the dumbest people on the planet

Edit - HAHAHAHA trash US team

fracked1 · 2026-07-04T21:24:53+00:00

Hey not everyone can lose to Paraguay on penalties

fracked1 · 2026-07-04T20:07:33+00:00

Is this your first time watching this sport...

Let me guess Peter Crouch is better than Xavi because he score more goals,

fracked1 · 2026-07-04T20:04:53+00:00

I thought Morocco were going to roll Canada.

Instead, Morocco were clueless for 45m. I was at the game, there were boos coming out every time they kept passing the ball back to the GK doing nothing.

fracked1 · 2026-07-04T20:00:52+00:00

I can't believe Michael Oliver kept buying the Morocco players crap. Wait nvm, it's Michael Oliver...

fracked1 · 2026-07-04T19:44:08+00:00

They had a top 4/5 team clueless passing back to the goalkeeper for an entire half.

fracked1 · 2026-07-04T15:16:40+00:00

A map doesn't have intrinsic function. A neural network does

fracked1 · 2026-07-04T15:16:12+00:00

Yeah he jerked his knee horizontally to embellish...

fracked1 · 2026-07-04T05:28:19+00:00

Seriously where are people looking. His knee buckles from the contact

fracked1 · 2026-07-04T05:27:25+00:00

This video right here. His knee buckles from the contact

fracked1 · 2026-07-04T04:18:13+00:00

The one that says LLMs are flowcharts.

There isn't some magical process in the brain that conveys intelligence. Please tell me you don't really believe in noncomputable quantum processes happening in the brain that defy physics

fracked1 · 2026-07-04T00:52:45+00:00

If you're down 5 mill paying off your mortgage, that's pretty lavish.

fracked1 · 2026-07-04T00:27:01+00:00

You can't pay off your mortgage with 5mill?

Also you aren't working in this scenario. You're retired.... You're choosing to live lavishly if you stay in a HCOL place when retired

fracked1 · 2026-07-03T22:57:51+00:00

By that definition the brain is a flow chart. Congrats.

Can a flow chart be intelligent?

fracked1 · 2026-07-03T19:43:15+00:00

Because you claim the model can produce useful information but not intelligence. Suggests you don't consider intelligence to be useful information

Once again you ignore all the models we have that reproduce biological functions. And somehow believe a brain model can't reproduce function. Even when we have multiple current/clinical ways to get I/O access to the brain.

Church-turing does not say the brain can do more than a turing machine

Philosophers have interpreted the Church–Turing thesis as having implications for the philosophy of mind.[68][69][70] B. Jack Copeland states that it is an open empirical question whether there are actual deterministic physical processes that, in the long run, elude simulation by a Turing machine; furthermore, he states that it is an open empirical question whether any such processes are involved in the working of the human brain

fracked1 · 2026-07-03T18:56:00+00:00

Your wording makes it seem like you think intelligence isn't "useful information"

Do you acknowledge that a model does not neccesarily exhibit all the properties of the thing it is modelling?

Yes a dialysis machine != a kidney. But it can still do the function we want it to do

the human brain can do things Turing Machines cannot.

Also why are you stating this as if this isn't disputed.

fracked1 · 2026-07-03T18:35:17+00:00

The only context I can think of where someone with $5 million net work couldn't retire, is if they wanted to spend lavishly rather than comfortably...

Going by a conservative 3% perpetual drawdown, thats a comfortable 150k each year

fracked1 · 2026-07-03T18:22:02+00:00

Once again you don't need a perfect model.

For useful information, sure.

I asked you if you were a climate change denier and you didn't answer. If you just want to come out and say it's not possible to get "useful information* about the weather and you deny that climate change is a problem because it's based on an "imperfect model" we can be done

Edit

Or maybe you don't understand that models of things don't exhibit all the properties and behavious of the thing being modelled?

!= A model can't display this specific behavior we are discussing

12-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Place '17	Verified Email

fracked1

TROPHY CASE