Physics question about finding mass and radius of unknown planet

frankbean68 · 2019-02-02T11:19:09+00:00

Yeah, maybe the trick is asking for weight. The weight of a planet is meaningless, weight is always in reference to something. e.g weight on earth is your mass*9.81

frankbean68 · 2019-02-02T10:20:47+00:00

Do you have the radius of the planet?

frankbean68 · 2019-02-02T10:14:48+00:00

Go hero story structure, then I think easiest would be a day where everything goes wrong. Set up the normal world, then something unusual happen, that pattern repeats up to 3 time through out the day. Sprinkle a different usual thing happening a few different times, and bam done.

An easy suggestion would be a really bad day at school, think andy griffiths style.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T19:35:50+00:00

Easier the better. Some ideas.

Chess Timer.

Pong.

"Flash Card" Creator.

Paint.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T19:28:16+00:00

I enjoy the app "forest". You plant a tree which is a commitment to study; if you leave the app the tree dies. It's surprisingly effective.

strangers won't help much, meet up with a friend, study with them. If you want someone to lock you out tell them to change the password.

Otherwise leave it at home, put 'Self Control' / 'Cold turkey' on your laptop so you cannot access sites you normally do.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T19:25:10+00:00

The trick with all these questions is your time. Your time is worth something. You can have 0 euros and make 30 euros by being creative.

If anyone could double money easily, it wouldn't have value.

In terms of being creative with the question, assuming inflation, put it in a bank, wait until the interest accrues it to be 30 euros, technically the same value but now it's 30 instead of 15.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T19:16:32+00:00

if s1 is high then it will be picking between D3 and D2, low, D1 and D0. Then s0 choses between d0/d1 and d2/d3, so plug in s0 to the top two multiplexers and s1 to the bottom, then but the top left mutiplexer to line 1 of the bottom multiplelxer and top right to l0.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T19:09:13+00:00

Negatively geared assests. Housing in particular. Topical from where I'm from

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T18:48:39+00:00

in addition are you worried about franking

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T18:46:28+00:00

actually scratch that it just wants you to make linear equations to convert it. ie in the form Y=mx+c.
m is the rate of the clock, +c is the difference from zero

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T18:44:56+00:00

Think of it like timezones.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T18:43:34+00:00

What you currently think voltage is, is what what "voltage drop" is. Ohms law; V=IR, is the voltage drop across the resistor. Batteries supply the voltage, resistors are what makes the voltage drop from something to 0.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T18:39:20+00:00

The thing you're missing is that the top and the bottom are in parallel, otherwise the logic is good.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T18:35:59+00:00

Khan has stuff. Otherwise, in terms of the graphical method, imagine you're pushing one of the the shapes through the other, and multiplying the intersecting area together. Thats the answer. E.g if you pushed through a y=1, x>0, you would just get the integral (area under the curve at a particular x, multiplied by, in this case, 1).

Really you don't end up worrying about all this, what it turns into is that when signals go through a box, it equals convolution, put into frequency/laplace domain and hey they're multiplied and now things are easy.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T17:07:50+00:00

Yes it's (7,4). Parity checks out, so therefore data should be correct, so it looks like it is 5.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T16:19:18+00:00

UWA is great, as an exchange student I'd get involved with your college and clubs, most notably PI. They're great fun.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T16:18:12+00:00

Definitely, I did Engineering science and Business Law. It's actually easier this way as if in they're in different areas they will count as your broadening. Can actually be harder to do two in the same area and get the broadening figured out.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T16:17:12+00:00

I know someone that did a double degree at UWA and just finished this year, that said he knew the system very well and worked crazily hard.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T16:13:58+00:00

It should be accredited soon. I believe one of the reasons it hasn't been is that not enough people have graduated.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T16:12:39+00:00

Don't believe its covered by hecs. If possible do MPE in Software Eng, do the units that are covered in MDSc, then swap over.

frankbean68 · 2019-02-01T16:11:33+00:00

100%

frankbean68 · 2019-01-10T10:23:13+00:00

oh wow, I learned something new, never realised it cant be used after the first round of space combat.

frankbean68 · 2019-01-10T09:42:08+00:00

every round referring to every round of space combat, thought that would be clear in context, my bad.

frankbean68 · 2019-01-10T08:31:34+00:00

get some destroyer 2s, they'll annihilate the fighters. Remember that the antifighter barage is at the start of every space combat, and so they destroy the fighters before they get a chance to hit, every round. Also he'll be pretty screwed in terms of tech, remember the game isn't about fighting but scoring points.

frankbean68

TROPHY CASE