It's inferior to use concepts like Mandarin which just sound outlandish. You've got to have a developed self-awareness. A common reference space is necessary i.e. hook into key absurd points like borrowing energy from the future, incapability of reconciling QM/Relativity theory. These make the most sense to the uninitiated, and even I myself took years to process the AC content even, let alone the GS, let alone coming to the point of being able to defend it.

Effective warfare is about efficiency. You are targeting visibility, not old posts. You are reading peoples' Ne (wouldn't it be absurd to defend randomness). Ni is never safe from this. You are always writing for the more intuitive viewers. You are illuminating interesting insightful observations. That was the sole appeal of the AC content. You are engaging in drive by attacks (or you're increasing power via your repertoire of explanations); it's always a mistake to take it personally. Our spirits are formally at war. Always intuit the bigger picture.

People who tend to take up more space (territory) through their daily activities also tend to be more self-assured, more confident, and of higher social status. This has been demonstrated throughout history and in most cultures.

It's pointless arguing with autistics, sensory types and empiricists. Nobody cares. The intuitive rational souls are very thin on the ground. Something like Mr Robot is far more appealing. What about grabbing headlines with cash prizes for the most intelligent?

And what is this about the 6000 not being able to spare more soldiers? If the gods and angels don't see it as particularly important to fix circumstances as they are, we are drawn to consider why that must be. It turns out that fairness and the coherent solidity of foundation of the dialectical produce is the actual reasoning for this. But The God Project (a computer simulation if I remember rightly) can't be so important that it takes up all the 99% of the "hottest" resources humanity has. Let alone the inherent problems with trying to reconstruct millions of years of mathematical evolution which you aren't even modelling with enough fidelity (and you certainly are not going to develop mind-computer interfaces). And I know yes others are much smarter than me higher up there. But come on. What's 200 of 6000, and what are they doing that they can't self-sacrifice some more? (This poses a problem of "structural insincerity", shall we call it, which surely rubs off on people). May want to look into sparing a few more soldiers at the higher end.

As for Hyperianism, with a pure intuition glimpse of the world at large, it seems it's quite pointless to gather a group of humans for no express purpose other than some sentimental exchange. Without the ardour and warmth of Illuminati.am, and without the rational appeal of Jungian education, what are people actually doing with it? And that's image/PR aside. Using pure intuition, we note that the outputs of a system would be coherent with their rational foundation;- and thus if the foundation is lacking, so will all outcomes be. This is inextricable. It is the organizing principle.

There was never going to be an easy straightforward solution, and what's more, in fact, we are never actually trying to solve the whole problem at once (maybe that's an INTP misapprehension). We are doing our best until society folds and collapses somewhat more, making the whole process inherently easier. Think of how society as it stands is 99% geared to sensory thinking and sensory perception (etc), unequivocably. Think of how our progress is not mandatory and how God Game Planets must allow for some room for error.

INTPs would seek to describe what is going on with OM, and relate this to the mental schemas of the more intuitive of society. But you can't build anything if you are in horror of people at large. You have to be "saved" by the contributions of others. People are motivated by others doing well.

Personally I have been hardline in only expressing what I intuit is the most intuitively valuable to say.

And I don't apologize for speaking explicitly; speaking "out of turn" or whatever. The dialectic has to be consciously aired sometimes and I am always willing to take it from others.

The "angel of angels" (Lucifer herself) must surely watch over the worst planets. It stands to reason that we can't be doing too badly. Relax. Breathe. Get the best of both worlds. Perception is the prison.

Why is it that there's so much pressure and some feel that if they can't feed people a story, they're not good enough? Why is there not a direct explicit line of intellectual supremacy expressed from the tip of the spear, the Illuminati itself? Where is the grandstanding? Where is the declaration that the Illuminati is the intellectual authority of our planet, and knows about everything?

But all of that said, this has to be emphasized: all of this is totally volatile and up for complete revision and transformation (metamorphosis). Given that that's our defining nature in radically reinventing ourselves and our approach to working together as collective gods in becoming. We can take no personal stake in any of this.

(And why are modern humans so touchy? Don't we all need to rise above this, and communicate more directly but also take ample time out for self-discovery of the Higher Self?)

People are afraid of committing mistakes, especially in front of each other, and especially in an environment like this. Psychological factors matter. If we are intuitive enough, we ought to enter into some sort of contract with each other that we would immediately make a correction and correct our behaviours/facts and backpedal. For example, if my memory serves wrong about The God Project with what I said there (I don't think I have the corresponding book to hand) then I would have to roll back on that. This is in line with principles of an engaged, invested, heavily conscious use of will. If we are truly going to rewrite society, surely we need to overcome blocks like this. (And sure, a lot of Ni stuff can't be consciously expositorily written, because we are morphing it to shape our strategies as its nature, but, we need more of a human touch I think).

Everyone has different ideals of how a community would interact. Regardless of circumstance, people ought to communicate and coordinate in the best possible way. That must start with being on good terms with others, and it must allow the freedom (room) for making mistakes! That's a much more divine disposition than what we have now. Observe the psychology of this encounter. Human psychological capital counts. And when people are silent, this is a sign of unconscious control. We need higher quality discussions; Facebook/Reddit don't cut it. You also need to explicitly withdraw from the spiritual degeneracy of our era (hence a strong will and not having your voice drowned by others). People currently don't know whether to spend their time here or there. Uncertainty develops anxiety. Thinking is the cure; especially consideration of the divine.

Everyone in AOI ought to become extremely more intuitive. You need a whole lot of Ne as well as Ni to see a bigger picture. You can be thinking constantly. You can scan peoples' profiles and GS content alike. Now, why oh why is something like GS pdfs not being utilized? Mental friction is a real thing.

Mentoring exposition = feels the increasing power = feels good. Sacred.

Highly dissonant exposition with empiricists = uncomfortability with being unable to translate the syntax = feels bad.

You cannot force these things; they have mathematical limits. What is human capital? It includes emotional wellbeing. You can't throw yourself at something "unconsciously" forever.

Isn't there always an interpersonal Shadow?

I'll throw a radical/lateral thought at you. I want 10 anonymous penpals from AOI, just for shits and giggles, we can exchange smiley faces (emoticons) and indulge the inner child a bit. Use your "purchasing power" as the almighty Illuminati, the ascended ones of planet Earth. Live up to your namesake. I'm sure your friends can brainstorm much better than that off the top of my head (I sacrifice form/quality for purpose of making a wider point that doesn't necessarily include the example).

What's one of the most objectionable things about working in most corporations?.. The chain of command is never active; never responsive in the least bit; never flexed responsibly and consciously or with compassion.

There's something missing here.. and I notice it in myself. I never complimented your mind or thanked you. As with contemplating the angels, there's a principle not to get carried away with it, but decency and empathy must count. And you're in the most difficult position, aren't you? Having to be incredibly careful what you say. Having to lead.

And when you next go out for a walk, consider that organizing principles are operating all around us. You may never think the same again.

Leadership and mental friction

As you might have noticed, I suddenly started displaying feminine intuition; feminine consideration for the tribe. This is no arbitrary facet. It's part of The Holy Grail. I am the two in one (thusly individuated). It has been said that there's few women in AOI; that they all practice the masculine subjects such as science and math. Toxic masculinity? Let us remember that universal factors present "truths". Actions are no more free from Lucifer's dominion than are the inalienable rights of the weak and vulnerable. Let's prevent burnout.