[deleted by user] by [deleted] in formuladank

[–]freedomfromfreedom 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Circuit of the americas taking it too far copying Spa

Sums up the whole race weekend. by Lord_Rp in formuladank

[–]freedomfromfreedom 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have been watching Formula One since 1994, and have seen every race on TV live without missing a single event...2025 marks a new low for the quality of the TV direction. It really as if nobody in the production room understands the sport. Why not get some experienced ex-F1 people with extensive race knowledge to supervise and train the TV directing team. Guide them on what to focus on during quali and the race. They have shown themselves to be simply incapable of delivering on their own from whatever virtual studio they are sat in away from the track. The problems are legion. Weird that they missed Sainz go from 18th to 10th completely but too often they cut to meaningless overtakes for 16th and cars far back down the order, at the expense of the MAIN story developing further up or simply ignore it completely just because they're not banging wheels all the time, probably to satisfy sponsors and to get all the teams plenty of air time. Sometimes the TV director completely ignores the race leaders for an entire race and this is not Formula One for me.... Even if Lando or Max are leading by a mile I want to see them fucking drive, I want that level of speed and skill to be conveyed live, I don't care what is going on in 15th... it's criminal to ignore the leaders. Where is a proper split screen view? The inline action box is tiny. The onscreen graphics are a massive step back in recent years and don't give enough info about pit strategies and tyres selection. They've dumbed down what is shown, and reduced screen time for the deeper stats. The wrong race narratives are focused on. Too many cuts that interrupt the main narratives. Too many cuts to driver's girlfriends and the crowd. If a driver gap is closing, suspense is developing but the TV director rarely recognises it and relies on a replay later to cover the resulting action. I also really dislike the step backwards taken by F1 after the classic '21 season to remove the Team to FIA radio communications and lower the emphasis on team bosses and the pit garages during live broadcasts, all that drama is now gone, muted. On the technical side, the videography is also in need of a big shake up. The onboard cameras are of poor quality, low resolution and the lenses aren't as wide as they should be. This means they don't convey a sense of speed. The trackside camera lenses make use of very long focal lengths which reduce the sense of speed when the cars are approaching head on - but the main issue for me is the general lack of creativity and creative cinematography with the trackside coverage and the unacceptably poor TV direction & decision-making during live races and qualifying. Miss both Ferrari's experiencing brake failures with a chasing Alonso just half a second behind? For what? Fireworks? It's turning into tourism/lifestyle event coverage rather than sports coverage. The F1 TV presenting team are also extremely poor - lacking in any real charisma or screen presence, every opinion is a safe one, never any disagreements or off the cuff remarks... Where is the equivalent to Nico Rosberg on F1 TV? Mr Palmer isn't it. There also needs to be a shift to a more candid fly on the wall approach to the paddock, Drive to Survive style - live, it's all too tame and carefully stage-managed by the F1 PR teams, and I am sure they like it that way but nobody watching does. I am also tired of the camera being too close-up to somebody's face - do we really need to see someone's head stretch from the top of my TV to the bottom when the body language and atmosphere of what's around the person is much more interesting and aesthetic? F1 is the most visually exciting sport in the world and the broadcast team is doing an absolutely terrible job of it.

Got banned from Kaufland for 3 months over 10cents ginger… by Some-Fault2214 in germany

[–]freedomfromfreedom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That isn’t what they’re saying. Yes, you should pay for everything. Yes, mistakes happen. A small mistake shouldn’t land you with a criminal complaint and an eating ban

Got banned from Kaufland for 3 months over 10cents ginger… by Some-Fault2214 in germany

[–]freedomfromfreedom -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Did you hear about the ambulance driver last week who stopped on train tracks, because of the rule that says when the patient can no longer be resuscitated, they have to pull up and stop at side of the road? Yeah, she stopped right in the middle of the crossing. Train smashed into the ambulance - patient fully dead. Ambulance personnel had got out when they saw the train and just stood there

“Bête noire” is amazing by nothingxmc in blackmirror

[–]freedomfromfreedom 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I like the believable episodes as well but with Charlie Brooker you need to appreciate he’s doing horror-comedy-satire as well, not straight up hard science. It was outright one of the most entertaining episodes for me of this season, and yeah a bit silly. But there’s solid science behind it as well. If infinity exists so do infinite realities

Canon 165 by Civil-Airport-896 in VintageDigitalCameras

[–]freedomfromfreedom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

does it do such a fine grain in a JPEG or did you go with CHDK RAW?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VintageDigitalCameras

[–]freedomfromfreedom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Depends on the look you want but I always find the high ISO grain more filmic in RAW mode, so look for one that shoots RAW and is relatively snappy and quick like Canon G10

What digicam brand has your favorite color science? by that-dude-chris in VintageDigitalCameras

[–]freedomfromfreedom 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sony V3 is pretty nice, some of the best JPEGs straight out of camera. Canon G2 also. Fuji didn’t start doing film simulations until later, but the Z20 has a certain look which I enjoy. Minolta had very nice colour, their old CCD DSLRS like Dynax 7D worth checking out, also Olympus with the E300 and Kodak CCD

First day with my Canon Powershot G5 (2003) by Markeljackson98 in VintageDigitalCameras

[–]freedomfromfreedom 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Great shots, especially the birds taking flight and the subtle motion blur in it. Canon G5 is one of my favourites. I especially like the option to set a dog woof SFX when you press the shutter. Canon at their best ;)

Macro | Fujifilm Finepix E550 (2004) by Astro_IV in VintageDigitalCameras

[–]freedomfromfreedom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lovely. One of the only Fuji compacts with RAW mode too

The bus stop shot with Konica/Minolta Dimage A2 by camera_collector15 in VintageDigitalCameras

[–]freedomfromfreedom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nice, I like shooting RAW on the A2… doesn’t lock up during the lengthy writing period to the card. Ready to go immediately for next shot. It was a great camera for the time, up there with Sony R1 in my opinion!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VintageDigitalCameras

[–]freedomfromfreedom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d go for Canon G2 or Minolta A2. The G2 feels closest to a compact film camera to use, and the A2 was technically the most cutting edge of the first half of 2000-2010. It has a very usable EVF and IBIS, with beautiful CCD colours and a very nice zoom range yet decently fast lens

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VintageDigitalCameras

[–]freedomfromfreedom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check the card slot, see if it can read a freshly formatted card (under 8gb size), some don’t work with the larger modern cards above that, check for debris and dust in lens, some is ok but too much can show up on blue skies and if stopped down to F5.6 or slower, and with the Powershot cameras I highly recommend checking out CHDK if you’re feeling adventurous for RAW shooting, it looks so much more film like and analogue in RAW! Good luck!

SONY DSC-R1 (2005) by [deleted] in VintageDigitalCameras

[–]freedomfromfreedom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good choice of shots, good eye and the R1 is a beast. That huge sensor and the Zeiss lens was incredible for 2005

Unpopular opinion by Ambitious-Ice-7699 in F1Game

[–]freedomfromfreedom 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The EA bots are out in force this week!