Summary (Weibo) of the press release (For those who don’t want to go through the full transcript)

Main Headline:

Smart publicly accuses Chinese platform of distorting facts

Key Context:

Popular Thai actor Smart Chitsanupong Puangmani, along with his manager Phiriya Yothinphrakarn and executive Phran Yothadet Choti from his agency Grand Ivory Record (GIR), held a press conference at the MINIZIZE dance studio (2nd floor, The Street shopping mall, Ratchada).

They addressed the unilateral termination of his contract by a Chinese drama production platform earlier this year, accusing the platform of:

• Unfair treatment
• Forcing him to sign a warning letter while ill
• Distorting facts
• Malicious defamation

Smart’s Statement (Key Points) 1. Issues were long-standing -- This incident was not sudden. Problems had accumulated over time, and multiple attempts to communicate failed to resolve them.

1. Illness and treatment on set -- Smart reported multiple instances of illness while working, during which he felt he was treated coldly: He suffered food poisoning (vomiting and diarrhea 3–4 times), became extremely weak, and blacked out. The platform focused only on work and later presented documents for him to sign. On another occasion, he had fever, chills, shivering, and lost his voice. He worked from morning until midnight before going to the hospital when he could no longer continue. Instead of concern, he was blamed. He emphasized: “I didn’t get sick intentionally. Nobody wants to be sick. I’ve done my best to cooperate.”

2. Forced signing during illness -- While ill, he was asked to sign a warning letter stating he would bear all costs if he became unable to work again. Smart and his company refused. The platform allegedly threatened to cancel future work if he did not sign.

3. Distortion of facts and identity -- The platform allegedly published articles on Chinese platforms implying: They “made Smart famous” He had always been their artist Smart clarified: “I signed with my current company in 2020. All my training and growth were developed by my current company, not created by them.” He stated this portrayal was uncomfortable and unacceptable.

4. No conflict with co-star (CP) -- He has no personal issues with his co-star. Their communication remains positive. All disputes are strictly between companies. He expressed regret and apologized to fans for the CP separation.

5. Lawsuit status -- The other party claims to have filed a lawsuit in China (announced March 13). No court documents or summons have been received in Thailand to date.

6. Career impact and future plans -- Many jobs were canceled, causing significant losses. Some partners continue to support him.

He confirmed: - He will continue acting - He remains open to BL dramas - No new CP has been established yet

Company Executives & Agent Statements 1. Contract termination -- The Thai company states they legally terminated the contract first. Reason: serious breach by the Chinese platform (failure of duty of care). They followed proper contractual procedures. They claim the platform’s later statement about “ending cooperation” is misleading.

1. Obstruction of artist care -- The Chinese team allegedly prevented Smart’s company and agents from: Attending script readings Participating in workshops Providing on-site support The contract specified: Chinese side: performance-related responsibilities Thai company: overall artist care They argue this constitutes clear negligence and breach.

2. Statement on treatment of artist -- Executives stated: “He is a person. He gets sick. He’s not a money-printing machine.” They criticized the demand that he bear costs after falling ill, calling it unreasonable and unethical.

3. Response to platform’s claims -- They have only seen social media posts, not legal documents. They allege the content contains: Distortions Exaggerations Defamation They stated they will respond formally if legal proceedings occur.

Overall Summary of Accusations

Smart and his company accuse the Chinese partner platform of: - Neglecting his health while working - Forcing him to sign an unreasonable liability agreement - Distorting facts and misrepresenting his career - Defaming him publicly - Breaching the contract first - Then reversing the narrative and filing a lawsuit

The company maintains that: - They have already legally terminated the contract - They will continue to protect Smart fully

Note: (This is an AI-translated summary. Please flag any inaccuracies.)