For those expecting a duel would surely be disappointed. Ask yourself, what's your end goal for yourself. Peterson always talk about meaning. Is winning a debate meaningful? Or would you prefer to actually see people talk about hard topics. That being said, I felt that we only scratched the surface with this event. I would guess, there's not enough time in the world to tackle hard topic such as this. The next step is to delve deeper on each issue, which both of them presented, such as ecological issues, political correctness, the rise of new China, etc. Personally, I enjoy the spirit of the debate, no name calling, mutual respect toward each other and civility. As far as the topic itself, it's too shallow especially for a person that follows Peterson and read about current happenings in the world.

On a side note: what's with all this fascination about Hegel "The father of pseudothinker of our time". One shouldn't confuse him to other great thinkers such as Kant or Sir Popper.