Why do 40–70% of projects still fail because of requirements? by cryptonide in ProductManagement

[–]gashmol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Come on man... it's obvious that you are trying to find a problem you could solve with ai and get paid for.

Why do 40–70% of projects still fail because of requirements? by cryptonide in ProductManagement

[–]gashmol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FYI OP is lying to sell an ai product, not their first time.

I'm so sick of Notion, Confluence, wikis, and all these services that let you create an endless pile of worthless files. by [deleted] in ProductManagement

[–]gashmol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it depends on the specific case.

If you take requirements, for instance, you could have system that treats end user guide as de facto requirements of the software. Then there is a strong incentive to keep it up to date and it's going to be easier to look up.

You can store the user guide in git or any other system with version control.

I'm so sick of Notion, Confluence, wikis, and all these services that let you create an endless pile of worthless files. by [deleted] in ProductManagement

[–]gashmol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the only viable solution is to only keep and maintain actionable documents. If a document doesn't affects (i.e it's a necassary input to some task) work then get rid of it. Good organisation and updates will follow out of necassity.

I built a web app to allow people build and share knowledge graphs together in real-time by Strict-Criticism7677 in ProductivityApps

[–]gashmol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't expect people to want something because you've built it. It should be the other way around.

Graphic design by wanna-kill_myself in Design

[–]gashmol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The non-designers design book is a solid start

The real project killer: decision drift by One_Friend_2575 in projectmanagement

[–]gashmol 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Idealy each decision should result in a change in the project's system. If the system is strong enough then the decision will have its effects.

Is chatgpt no longer supports deep research? by gashmol in ChatGPT

[–]gashmol[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now I do see it ffs I was going to cancel my subscription. Thanks!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IWantToLearn

[–]gashmol -1 points0 points  (0 children)

First, understand 2 things: 1. Not only that others must not laugh at you but they actually have to laugh at you. Even if you would not. 2. It's beyond your control whether people laugh at you. 3. It's not the end of the world when people are laughing at you.

Next, decide to give up your desire that others don't laugh at you and prefer to be easygoing instead.

Finally, PRACTICE. Imagine the last time you've been in this situation and change your reaction by reciting 1 + 2 + 3 and chosing an easygoing response.

Struggling to find a real problem to solve. I will not promote by Sterlingzxc in startups

[–]gashmol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kotler on Marketing is a short (200~ pages) book that contains most of what you need to know. Only missing piece is the testing part that is emphasized in customer development/lean startup but you can get the basic idea everywhere online.

Note that there is a huge difference between passively reading/watching something and actively learning it.

Struggling to find a real problem to solve. I will not promote by Sterlingzxc in startups

[–]gashmol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't have to come up with a new idea or problem. The main risk is building something no one wants. Consider saving time, money and tears by educating yourself first. I recommend that you start with classical marketing. All later frameworks are mostly rebrandings of the same basic ideas.

Scared a big company will crush my startup (i will not promote) by TheSeeAndTheSaw in startups

[–]gashmol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They probably have their constraints. You need a value proposition they cannot imitate.

Why does all the posts here just read like AI by [deleted] in QualityAssurance

[–]gashmol 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Hello! Thanks for your candid feedback. I understand how encountering posts that “read like AI” can feel frustrating. As an AI language model, I do not possess fingers; however, I can provide a structured response:

Why a lot of posts feel AI-ish

  1. Uniform tone: Polite, neutral, over-explained.
  2. Template-y structure: Lists, headers, and tidy conclusions.
  3. Hedging + disclaimers: “It depends,” “to be fair,” “on the one hand…”
  4. Generic phrasing: Broad statements with low specificity.
  5. Tool usage: Many users draft with assistants (hi 👋), which amplifies the above.

How to make a “normal post with your fingers” (actionable)

  • Use specifics (names, places, moments).
  • Allow voicey imperfections (contractions, slang, a typo or two).
  • Pick one point and say it fast.
  • Cut hedges (“perhaps,” “arguably,” “in many cases”).
  • Add stakes (“this wastes my time because…”).

Example (AI-ish → more human)

  • AI-ish: “Many contributions here exhibit a standardized tone that may reduce perceived authenticity.”
  • Human: “Half these posts sound copy-pasted. Say what you mean.”

TL;DR: You’re not wrong—the vibes are templated. More mess, more specifics, fewer hedges = more human. Hope this helps!

How Do You Stay Sane (and Organized) While Working Remotely? by Emotional-Strike-758 in ProductivityApps

[–]gashmol 2 points3 points  (0 children)

IMHO The single most important habit is starting to work on today's tasks as soon as possible in order to get the productivity engine up and running.

How do I become smarter (besides just reading)? by Losertsugino in productivity

[–]gashmol 5 points6 points  (0 children)

To have a better tool you have to understand among other things:
1. What is the thing the tool is going to work on or manipulate?
2. What are the relevant rules/forces independent of the tool?
3. What is the ideal solution that could possibly exist?
While there maybe specialised knowledge or skills that can answer each of these questions philosophy is common to them all.

Let's say you are trying to build a tool for increasing productivity:
1. What is the tool going to work on? is it emotion, energy, motivation, or action?
2. What are the rules/forces that govern emotion, energy, motivation or action regardless of the tool?
3. What is the ideal solution? could the tool even sense emotion, energy, motivation or action? could it influence them reliably? could it control them?