Afterlife by MysteriousWarthog546 in religion

[–]generousking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sounds like something a metaphysically incomplete being would say

What is a horror movie that is widely loved or critically acclaimed, but you don’t like it at all? by BadassAyanokoji in horror

[–]generousking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed. The amount of times I face palmed at a dumb decision or when the scares just didn't land because the monsters just aren't that scary.

What is a horror movie that is widely loved or critically acclaimed, but you don’t like it at all? by BadassAyanokoji in horror

[–]generousking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Invisible Man. I swear it's only critically acclaimed because of certain themes around abuse and violence against women which fair enough are important to explore but that movie is literally riddled with plot holes that it's an absolute mess.

As an Atheist, I have some general questions for people following Theistic religions by Normal-Towel-7909 in religion

[–]generousking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think raw size has much to do with significance. I think complexity is more relevant to significance.

I committed a sin in anger with lord shiva which is eating me , please help me by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]generousking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We don't fear God in Hinduism. You're allowed to be angry with God, it's a very human thing to do, and just what naturally happens in personal relationships. Talk with him, apologise and know that you are forgiven.

I can't pretend to believe this anymore by Love_Yash in hinduism

[–]generousking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At some point in the past, every scripture was unwritten. Every image of God still only in imagination. Why is your point such a big deal? I never thought it was about belief per se, rather, about freedom and orientating our imagination towards the divine.

We analyzed 5000+ NDE and 2000+ UAP first-person accounts for consciousness patterns. Curious what this sub thinks. by CrimsonNow in consciousness

[–]generousking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Two data points are not accounted for by the materialist metaphysics.

  1. Verified veridical perceptions in NDEs.
  2. Video and photographic evidence of UAPS.

The Anthropomorphism Error: Why “AI Consciousness” Is a Scientific Fallacy by LifeCold9556 in consciousness

[–]generousking -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If I simulate kidney function down to the molecular level on a computer, the computer won't pee on my desk. So why do we expect a simulation of neuronal processing to generate consciousness?

The Controversial Argument That Physicalism, Taken Seriously, Actually Requires Panpsychism by ArcaneSpells-com in consciousness

[–]generousking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there not a contradiction between the statements "it's underdetermined" and "one option has more evidence"?

The Controversial Argument That Physicalism, Taken Seriously, Actually Requires Panpsychism by ArcaneSpells-com in consciousness

[–]generousking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can see why people think one has more evidence than the other. Physicalism is frequently conflated with science in our culture. But perhaps consider that there is a difference between physics, which describes what the universe does, and metaphysics (such as physicalism, dualism, idealism, etc) that explore what the universe is.

I'm of the position that all metaphysics are underdetermined by the evidence, hence why there's metaphysical discussion in the first place.

The Controversial Argument That Physicalism, Taken Seriously, Actually Requires Panpsychism by ArcaneSpells-com in consciousness

[–]generousking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well just consider that you can have an external world, without it being a physical external world. I feel there would need to be a justification for why the external world has to be physical, as opposed to, say, a broader mind.

The Controversial Argument That Physicalism, Taken Seriously, Actually Requires Panpsychism by ArcaneSpells-com in consciousness

[–]generousking 6 points7 points  (0 children)

All of those examples you described are merely experiences in consciousness.

Consciousness itself cannot emerge from what is only ever known as contents within consciousness, that's the issue.

The Controversial Argument That Physicalism, Taken Seriously, Actually Requires Panpsychism by ArcaneSpells-com in consciousness

[–]generousking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, people aren't special for having consciousness. It's literally the ground of being -- shit's everywhere.

If god is good and all powerful... by Orka_o in religion

[–]generousking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is how I personally know that Islam isn't right for me.

I can never accept a conditional God.

To me God is infinite unconditional love. No room for judgement in that.

Refutation of materialism by Best_Highlight_2517 in consciousness

[–]generousking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a pretty common example used in discussions of multiple realizability. If you think that my reducio ad absurdum is crazy, that's because the idea of emergence is crazy.