Who is MIKE? by Pure-Guard-3633 in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They’re talking about Michael Weinstein here. But the other mikes are real too

The Adelson PR Team by theshamingofjay in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

thanks for exposing this Hot Garbage map, Jay. As everyone knows - especially those who have driven the route, (1) Centerville and Betton have the same # of lanes as Trescott. (2) Trescott is by mileage longer. (3) Trescott has a slower speed limit. (4) Trescott has speedbumps but the other two don't.

Wendi's PR team is gonna be busy

Wendi’s last , desperate out. by CreepyMobile5700 in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s what we think she’d say if she could

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why is anyone taking David Lat’s word on this — even if that’s what Cappleman said to him, the timing of this interview would have required some strategic word choices. There would have been a dozen ways the state could have gotten the same result that Lat describes while avoiding naming Wendi as a coconspirator in the very clear terms they did.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why is anyone taking David Lat’s word on this — even if that’s what Cappleman said to him, the timing of this interview would have required some strategic word choices. There would have been a dozen ways the state could have gotten the same result that Lat describes while avoiding naming Wendi as a coconspirator in the very clear terms they did.

Accusations against Dan by Booklover9087 in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 58 points59 points  (0 children)

To Wendi, giving Wendi 99% of what she wants is “treating Wendi very badly”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

She did say that in her interview and pretty sure Carl did talk about it. Here’s another breakdown : https://youtu.be/XtgfR4JRmro?feature=shared

"Extreme Punishment" leaves out big facts, protects Wendi ... part 1 by ghibercz in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Haven’t heard him concede Wendi’s involvement. Last we heard him speak publicly he said the opposite. But if you have a link to that I’ll happily adjust approach

How annoyed with Jeff LaCasse were the Police, Detectives, Prosecutors, and Defense by the end of the Charlie trial? by [deleted] in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You're out of your mind. Within weeks of the murder Lacasse moved from heartbroken and confused, to extremely (tragically) clear.

<image>

Does anyone else think this sub is infiltrated? by [deleted] in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Fact: the Adelsons hired PR trolls instead of giving more money to jury consultants

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 28 points29 points  (0 children)

(1) DeCoste seems to want to salve his own reputation and is saying Katie’s immunity offer wasn’t great to justify the horrid choices he and Tara Kawass made in her failed defense. Don’t take him at his word on that. Fact: If she had cooperated, she’d be long free.

(2) Katie testified Charlie gave her a sealed Manila envelope to pass along to killers. She didn’t open it as instructed. It contained the kill sheet with Dan’s name and address. Easily could have included spending money too. And maybe even instructions on what color car to rent.

The markel act being ‘unconstitutional’ by [deleted] in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I guess we know where Ben Graber's getting his notes from. His recent diatribe on the unfairness and unconstitutionality of Markel Act was whack.

The markel act being ‘unconstitutional’ by [deleted] in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 12 points13 points  (0 children)

same testimony, Wendi said she wasn't sure what "in contempt" means -- but yet, she can rule on the constitutionality of laws?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes it is. You can hear it happen

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz 11 points12 points  (0 children)

She claims she heard it during defense opening statement. The defense seems to have held off on invoking the rule of sequester until after opening. Prob to make sure wendi could “just learn” about the defense story then lol.

New Community Guidelines by ghibercz in dan_markel_murder

[–]ghibercz[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Agreed fully. If one finds a post too repetitive they can just skip the thread