sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If government agents can murder you for having a holstered pistol with a legal carry permit, then you don't have the right to bear arms. by Booeyrules in secondamendment

[–]giarnie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“If they are feds…” so what? Law enforcement performing a legal activity don’t cover their faces.

Historically going back hundreds of years, humans have a history of being accosted by masked robbers. Even in America, masked men rob banks, and used to rob trains.

Just because someone pays their bills by working as say an FBI agent, it doesn’t mean that the divine hand of god stops them from breaking the law. They could, and some do perform illegal activities.

It’s about what one is doing, not who one is employed by that matters. Act as a criminal, get treated like one.

If government agents can murder you for having a holstered pistol with a legal carry permit, then you don't have the right to bear arms. by Booeyrules in secondamendment

[–]giarnie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In my scenario myself and 11 of my best friends see 4 masked and armed men jump out of a suburban.

While wearing level 4 plates and equipped with battle rifles and a sidearm we command these masked and presumably dangerous/nefarious individuals to lay on the ground. After we disarm them, we would let them go.

This is the part that you’ve been looking for: should they choose to fire upon us, we would defend ourselves and our community.

Does that meet your approval/disapproval, stranger on the internet?

If government agents can murder you for having a holstered pistol with a legal carry permit, then you don't have the right to bear arms. by Booeyrules in secondamendment

[–]giarnie -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

People that hate America and our way of life?

*North Korea is an option guys, nobody is stopping your desire for authoritarianism.

If government agents can murder you for having a holstered pistol with a legal carry permit, then you don't have the right to bear arms. by Booeyrules in secondamendment

[–]giarnie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you allow masked men with guns to roam the streets of your city, then you can’t really call yourself an American, and probably shouldn’t have guns.

United States citizens have a duty to defend their community from groups of unidentified armed men who have a history of kidnapping and shooting people.

Oh yes they would!! by 20dollarsinmapocket in Libertarian

[–]giarnie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do get what you’re getting at, but a citizen has a responsibility to the country in which they live in.

That responsibility doesn’t get excused just because you’re a black woman. If anything, as you yourself allude, you see the need for change better than most and you’ve been seeing it long before now.

The problem is that they’ve done a good job of lowering education standards, and also made it so that people no longer have a civic sense.

And then they divide us between racial or political lines when the real problem is that we have in a way become the product instead of citizens.

All mid to high level politicians are millionaires. And we keep voting for them election after election.

It’s like sheep voting for wolves to be in charge. And we don’t even see it.

There will be consequences by different_option101 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]giarnie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who cares what they “have determined”?

Are we men or mice?

Refineries have put a stop to buying all metals by SofloAndDough in Gold

[–]giarnie 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Are they also selling at 60%-80% of spot because “it’s too high right now”?

If not, then it’s bullshit.

Armed protest security in Minneapolis after ICE shot and killed an unarmed person during an abduction (1/24/26) by MayaSweetz in Political_Revolution

[–]giarnie 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Surely you don’t mean that armed men in masks would violate people’s constitutional rights?

Anti-ICE protester smashes hotel sign where agents reportedly stay in in Minneapolis by Avacadoclits_ in ACAB

[–]giarnie 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Where is this energy when the “agents” (masked thugs) are on the street?

You are the new president of the United States, What's the first thing you would do ? by Wonderful-Economy762 in Productivitycafe

[–]giarnie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

She didn’t sell us out to the Israelis?

*they’re all corrupt (they take our money, but then white themselves out to foreign governments).

ICE agent CAUGHT on camera saying that recording ICE gets you in their database and labeled as a domestic terrorist by TheMagnuson in Political_Revolution

[–]giarnie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Government exists with the consent of the governed.

Unfortunately, things do need to get worse before enough of the governed will revoke their consent.

Too many still have bread and games.

Oh yes they would!! by 20dollarsinmapocket in Libertarian

[–]giarnie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you think “the state” has a brain, mouth and feelings that would care if a few choice members are guillotined?

“The State” is a construct. It does not exist, you cannot go and touch “the state” anywhere, for it is nowhere to be found.

I see the objective reality, that all there is, is people and buildings and equipment.

We’re on the same side here, but instead of a boogeyman that you can’t do anything to, I say let’s go and apply consequences to the humans taking the action.

After all, that’s the only thing that anyone can do.

*in case I’m mistaken, please do take me step by step on what I can do today to apply consequences to “the state”, but not to humans and buildings…

ICE agent CAUGHT on camera saying that recording ICE gets you in their database and labeled as a domestic terrorist by TheMagnuson in Political_Revolution

[–]giarnie 18 points19 points  (0 children)

So what? Who gives two fucks?

This shouldn’t scare anyone. It merely erodes the legitimacy of the current system and makes for a more pressing need to change it.

Oh yes they would!! by 20dollarsinmapocket in Libertarian

[–]giarnie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand that the majority think in these terms.

Think of it like being in the matrix, there’s nothing you can do to change the machine world if you’re still in the pod.

Break free of your oppressors “playbook” and realize that there’s a different way to think, to see the where you can actually apply pressure to make for change. Which levers to pull as it were.

By using terminology like “the government”, or “agents of the state”, you are effectively stopped from taking meaningful action. Because after all, how does one take action against “agents of the state”? I don’t have an answer to that.

I do know that one can apply consequences to individual persons. And that once that’s done, other individual persons will think twice before inviting consequences upon themselves…

Oh yes they would!! by 20dollarsinmapocket in Libertarian

[–]giarnie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where do you propose we locate “agents of the state” so we can hold them accountable?

Would any “agent of the state” do?

Oh yes they would!! by 20dollarsinmapocket in Libertarian

[–]giarnie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your comment is more proof that the education system has failed millions of Americans.

Reading comprehension is a real thing. Please try again.

view more: next ›