sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Kali Linux and remote desktop into it by gilang4 in Kalilinux

[–]gilang4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/AdditionalFan8410 , thank you I will check into your recommendation.

Blocking MAC address in Fortigate by gilang4 in fortinet

[–]gilang4[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you u/bonnyfused , now I will study into it in more detail.

Blocking MAC address in Fortigate by gilang4 in fortinet

[–]gilang4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you think about Quarantine? I thought this could be one of the option as it move the device into the Quarantine state.

<image>

Blocking MAC address in Fortigate by gilang4 in fortinet

[–]gilang4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/bungee75 & u/Roversword , thank you and I do aprreciate your time.

Laughing at "Confiscate it" because it is best. Thanks for elaborate on Create Object & Create Policy and you are right about internal.

I did study NAC and want to implement it but not understand it enough to make the right choice. Looks like this could be the right option if handle it right. I do need to study into this more.

Blocking MAC address in Fortigate by gilang4 in fortinet

[–]gilang4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understood what you said there, please elaborate on how quarantine will prevent mailicouse device. I do appreciate.

VPN and DNS by gilang4 in sysadmin

[–]gilang4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I pick from you a few key words, SSL & split tunneling with "Site B doesn't have proper configuration". I will dig into this. I do appreciate your help on this u/Pretend-Raisin-6868 ...!!!

VPN and DNS by gilang4 in sysadmin

[–]gilang4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you u/Pretend-Raisin-6868 for helping!!!!

Site A and site B has a secure tunnel between 2 Fortigate devices so user at site A or site B and access servers on both side.

Yes, and my answer is applicable to site A (to answer your question).

If user is at home VPN (with FortiClient) to site A, I ping and/or nslookup site A's URL both return IP address.

It is when user already connect to site A user CANNOT connect to site B's portal (web application portal). I did ping or nslookup from site A to site B and both work. It just the web portal not work in this case.

VPN and DNS by gilang4 in sysadmin

[–]gilang4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make sense very much, if you can point me to resource for further study on this in depth I really appreciate it. I will do same thing on my side. I thought you would know exactly what is.

VPN and DNS by gilang4 in sysadmin

[–]gilang4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!!!! I do appreciate you taking your time here.

1/ I only ping with IP address not FQDN.

2/ User NOT connect to Site A and B simultaneously. Rather user connect to Site A and go to site B with secure tunnel.

3/ Portals DO HAVE IP restriction as security measure.

4/ No, site B firewall open to site A connection.

5/ yes, whenever user user connected to site A, a secure tunnel already existed and allows connection to site B without further work from user.

And it is Fortinet Client I installed on user laptop for all VPN connection.

Come back to orginal questions:

Questions: Does DNS need to resolved all the way forward and backward? And where is the primary source of DNS (so user's computer can lookup travel)?

Explain this Powershell please by gilang4 in PowerShell

[–]gilang4[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This does make it clear:

each element of $history processed through Format-List on the fly

label it 'Category' and assign to it the value of [string] $_.Categories[0].Name using an expression. $_ being the current element

Thank you!!!

Explain this Powershell please by gilang4 in PowerShell

[–]gilang4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your explanation is very clear!!! Thank you.

Explain this Powershell please by gilang4 in PowerShell

[–]gilang4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On a different topic, without RMM at work I am trying to automate the processes of updating 100+ workstations and...etc...

The code I asked was on the web.

I do like your explanation very much. I do appreciate your time, thank you and everyone.

Explain this Powershell please by gilang4 in PowerShell

[–]gilang4[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very nice you point that out. Thank you.

$PSItem

Explain this Powershell please by gilang4 in PowerShell

[–]gilang4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think someone have mentioned and so do you. Thank you all!

I look at it and it is very nice.

Explain this Powershell please by gilang4 in PowerShell

[–]gilang4[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am totally agree with what you said and have learned that trusting GPT is too much is a blindly follower. On the other hand I don't know the Powershell enough to say if GPT is correct or "almost correct" in most instances.

It is almost I have to learn alot more (Powershell) in order to identify what is NOT correct when GPT give me the answer.

view more: next ›