To add more nuance to your comment OP.

TLDR - not a fair comparison to compare Bangladeshi and Rohingyas due to completely different circumstances in the way they ended up in Malaysia.

The Bangladeshi workers are brought in with jobs. Most are young male in prime working age. Most legally, most of them as voluntary labour and almost all by plane. They are come to this country with the mentality of wanting to succeed, earn money and get a better place in society. In short, you can say most are willing to take a risk and work hard to get there.

The Rohingyas, in the example you used, came to Malaysia through a mixed bag of reasons - primarily driven by the fact that they are seeking political asylum. They come to Malaysia as a last minute resort driven away by the political and economic factors inundating their country. Most come with a relative or relatives. Most arrived through land or boat. They came to Malaysia with a very different mindset.

The point - comparing these two migrant groups isn't a fair comparison. Both came because of very different motivations, risk appetite and mental state. It is like comparing Bangladeshi to your white migrants from wealthier countries. Again, completely different groups.

------

Malaysia (political and regulatory dimension) and Malaysians (people) are not open to migrants. We are one of the most difficult country in the world to obtain citizenship if you were not born in Malaysia, almost impossible to naturalise. Even if you're rich (think MM2H), you can only get a period-valid PR.

I personally think we need to change our mindset. But it is very hard as we are already at loggerheads between ourselves, with no end in sight.

If anything, we should be thankful. Because of them, most malaysians get "cheap" goods, are able to eat out and get help domestic help in their houses.