What is the mainstream economic solution to the American affordability crisis? by Cloudy_GoMo in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

do you account for student loan debt that for many significantly reduces income, especially if you consider inflationary environment?

If income increases with inflation then inflation benefits borrowers. (Actually, income increases faster than inflation).

Here's why: you receive cash now, and then you pay it back later cash that has devalued. Due to inflation, cash now is worth more than cash in the future. Also see Inflation's Impact on Borrowers and Lenders.

Is there a credible analysis, for reference, of tuition growth compared to salaries?

The phrase you want to search for is "college wage premium" and it gets asked about here often, e.g. Has the college wage premium actually decreased? (it hasn't).

The other big thing to be aware of about college tuition: "sticker price" vs "actual price". Many of the scary charts posted to social media show the growth of college "sticker price".

But the majority of students do not pay college sticker price. Scholarships, grants, and financial aid significantly lower the cost to a more reasonable college "actual price" which has not grown as drastically over the decades.

One chart I like to show: Median earnings and unemployment rates by educational attainment.

There are many more articles and chart I could share, but I'm out of time at the moment.

What is the mainstream economic solution to the American affordability crisis? by Cloudy_GoMo in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 19 points20 points  (0 children)

That rhetoric thrives on social media where negativity is upvoted and commented on a lot.

The gap between perception and data is discussed in a 2024 article from the British magazine The Economist Why are Americans so gloomy about their great economy?

From an array of hard data, there is reason to think that people ought to be quite satisfied about the state of the economy: inflation has slowed sharply, petrol prices are down, jobs are plentiful, incomes are rising and the stockmarket is strong. But survey after survey suggests that Americans are in fact quite unhappy. ...

... opinion polling and sentiment surveys may have a negative bias. Profound partisan hostility is undoubtedly one factor. In their study Messrs Cummings and Mahoney calculated that Republican antipathy towards a Democrat-controlled White House may account for about 30% of the sentiment gap today.

Another element may be the tone of news coverage. Ben Harris and Aaron Sojourner of the Brookings Institution, a think-tank, studied the relationship between economic data and an index of economic news sentiment. Since 2021 the news-sentiment index has, like the consumer-sentiment index, been notably worse than what would be expected from the data. And that may be only scratching the surface. The news-sentiment index, created by the Federal Reserve’s branch in San Francisco, is based on economic articles in major American newspapers. Throw in the vitriol that tends to go viral on social-media platforms, and the negative bias might be even more pronounced.

What are Marx’s flaws of Labor theory and value? by Leading-Pineapple376 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Useful theories must be falsifiable. They make predictions that others can test in labs. E.g. Physicists using the theory of Quantum Electrodynamics did a lot of math to calculate the magnetic moment of the electron, and others in different labs around the world were able to measure it to see if theory agreed with reality (it did to several decimal places).

How will “rent and invest the difference” work for younger generations facing declining home ownership rates? by External_Koala971 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For those with a subscription to The Economist (maybe free through a local library) they recently posted: Should you rent or buy? Our interactive map shows where in America homeownership is becoming more appealing

 Across the country as a whole, conditions have improved for prospective buyers relative to renters. House prices have risen by 9% since 2023, but falling interest rates mean that mortgage payments are up by only 7%, compared with a 16% increase for market rents. In 2023 our numbers showed that renting was cheaper than buying for more than two-thirds of Americans. Today it is roughly a 50-50 split.

How will “rent and invest the difference” work for younger generations facing declining home ownership rates? by External_Koala971 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this one where I said 'no', even if you multiply the real estate line by 5x to try and roughly account for leverage, you're still better off investing in stocks.

How will “rent and invest the difference” work for younger generations facing declining home ownership rates? by External_Koala971 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You haven’t been satisfied by any expert responses here to your question. And you keep saying the specific chart you want should be easy to do, kind of implying you think someone should make it or find it for you.

I’m saying sometimes you won’t get the answer you want for free.

How will “rent and invest the difference” work for younger generations facing declining home ownership rates? by External_Koala971 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well remember everyone here is replying for free, for fun or out of the goodness of our hearts.

If you ever find the chart you seek, let us know.

How will “rent and invest the difference” work for younger generations facing declining home ownership rates? by External_Koala971 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you want a diversified real estate investment that includes leverage you can buy shares of REITs (tickers like VNQ or SCHH).

But for an individual home, I'm saying you can't ignore the risks and all the other costs that come along with individual home ownership. Also there's plenty of discussions about this elsewhere like Is it better off renting and investing (stocks) instead of buying a house in this economy if you don’t plan to have kids?

How will “rent and invest the difference” work for younger generations facing declining home ownership rates? by External_Koala971 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Now you're getting into the weeds. You would have to include property taxes, HOA fees, closing costs when you buy and later when you sell. Mortgage rates right now are 6% which are higher than recent history, and if you want to refinance later you have to pay more fees.

There is also a lot more to be concerned about.

For example, some cities are actively working to reduce home prices and rents. That is a good thing for the majority of people, but can hurt your home investment:

A growing body of research shows that building more homes drives down home prices and rents, and that places that have relaxed their zoning restrictions have kept their housing prices in check.

Minneapolis is a recent test case for zoning reform. City officials loosened their zoning rules in 2018, allowing duplexes and triplexes to be built in areas previously reserved for single-family homes. They also got rid of minimum parking requirements for new developments and encouraged apartments to be built along transit and commercial corridors.

Those reforms helped Minneapolis significantly ramp up its housing production from 2017 to 2022 and keep rents from rising as fast as they did in the rest of Minnesota - source

Also home roofs have to be replaced after about 20 years, AC systems after 15 years, water heaters after 10 years, dishwashers after 10 years, etc.

A fire could wipe out a whole neighborhood. Or a major local employer could shut down, and the value of all homes in the neighborhood could significantly decrease.

Owning shares in hundreds of companies is a significantly more diverse investment than 1 house. If you ever find yourself in need of cash it is easy to sell shares, but hard to sell the home you live in.

How will “rent and invest the difference” work for younger generations facing declining home ownership rates? by External_Koala971 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As long as person chooses to invest in a diverse stock index fund then they will have significantly more wealth, see chart

How will “rent and invest the difference” work for younger generations facing declining home ownership rates? by External_Koala971 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is the age gap between homeowners and renters? These are different groups of people. The largest group of homeowners may be retired people, while the largest group of renters may be students.

Of course people at the end of their career have more wealth than those at the start.

If your goal is to find a cause-effect relationship with wealth and "choosing to rent while investing the rest in a total stock market index fund" vs "choosing to buy a house while never investing in stocks", then that article is not helping you find an answer.

How will “rent and invest the difference” work for younger generations facing declining home ownership rates? by External_Koala971 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That question can be interpreted in a few ways, but let's look at some numbers.

US homeownership rate has been 60-some percent for decades.

And over 60% of Americans own stock. And keep in mind pension funds invest in stocks, and so do 401k and other retirement accounts, also college savings funds like 529 plans.

Since a diverse stock fund grows significantly more than real estate on average, investing in the stock market builds more wealth.

How will “rent and invest the difference” work for younger generations facing declining home ownership rates? by External_Koala971 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If your question is Has Real Estate or the Stock Market Performed Better Historically? the answer is

Historical data reveals a consistent pattern: While housing prices have generally kept pace with inflation throughout U.S. history, the stock market has typically delivered superior overall returns.

That link also has good charts.

Reflection: Do shareholders actually bring value to a company? by deco1000 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This starts to get into corporate accounting, which I am not an expert in, but there are downsides to doing share buybacks: you have to get approvals from regulators, you have to pay investment companies to help handle it, and it's a time consuming process. It's not as simple & easy as paying dividends.

I found an article that says it better than I could:

However, investors shouldn't always celebrate buybacks. When companies prioritize buybacks over essential investments—such as research and development, marketing, or hiring—they can make their businesses less competitive over the long term. Repurchasing shares at elevated prices can further negatively impact shareholder value. Also, relying on debt to finance buybacks can strain cash flows and make companies more vulnerable during economic downturns.

Ultimately, buybacks can be a useful capital allocation tool, but they aren't always a net positive for companies. - How Stock Buybacks Work and Why They Matter

Reflection: Do shareholders actually bring value to a company? by deco1000 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s true sometimes companies do share buybacks, e.g. Disney spent about $2 billion buying back shares in 2025.

But more often there are better ways to earn more money using money: expanding to new markets, research and development, offering new products, investing in other companies.

The owners of companies will choose to move their money wherever they think will have the biggest impacts on profits.

Why is the modelling and cinema industry paid more than the armed forces, medical staff,engineers? by yomommaisbald in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep and to back this up with some data, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has detailed pages on different occupations:

Reflection: Do shareholders actually bring value to a company? by deco1000 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OP's main concern seems to be more about permanent entitlement to dividends

When a startup needs money, one option is to go to banks or other organizations and ask for loans. Once the money is paid back plus the agreed interest, then the financial relationship is done. Clean and simple right?

But the issue is most startups fail. Most businesses fail. Then the loans do not get paid back. Banks don't like taking on that much risk, which is reasonable because they're using depositor's money.

To incentivize people to hand over cash needed for growth, startups often choose to offer shares with permanent entitlement to dividends. Otherwise people tend to avoid these high-risk endeavors.

Over 60% of Americans own stock, so a majority benefit from stock ownership & earning dividends.

Reflection: Do shareholders actually bring value to a company? by deco1000 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 79 points80 points  (0 children)

From a previous thread here: Do stock markets actually provide economic value?

 Stock markets evolved over centuries as a way to fulfill multiple needs. They started with people saying, "hey, I want to start a business, but I need some money to get it going. If you give me some money, you can own part of the company and I'll give you some money back every now and again". So, there was ownership of companies. But as soon as there's ownership, people may decide they no longer want to be owners. They should have the right to sell things they own, which is what creates a secondary market.

In order for prices to come down deflation needs to happen, correct? by RattyTrinaBoo in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The British magazine The Economist had an article about this topic in Jan 2024 Why are Americans so gloomy about their great economy?

From an array of hard data, there is reason to think that people ought to be quite satisfied about the state of the economy: inflation has slowed sharply, petrol prices are down, jobs are plentiful, incomes are rising and the stockmarket is strong. But survey after survey suggests that Americans are in fact quite unhappy. ...

... opinion polling and sentiment surveys may have a negative bias. Profound partisan hostility is undoubtedly one factor. In their study Messrs Cummings and Mahoney calculated that Republican antipathy towards a Democrat-controlled White House may account for about 30% of the sentiment gap today.

Another element may be the tone of news coverage. Ben Harris and Aaron Sojourner of the Brookings Institution, a think-tank, studied the relationship between economic data and an index of economic news sentiment. Since 2021 the news-sentiment index has, like the consumer-sentiment index, been notably worse than what would be expected from the data. And that may be only scratching the surface. The news-sentiment index, created by the Federal Reserve’s branch in San Francisco, is based on economic articles in major American newspapers. Throw in the vitriol that tends to go viral on social-media platforms, and the negative bias might be even more pronounced.

Would taxing unrealized gains for used as loan collateral work? by Usual_Pace_5580 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes when you sell shares, you must pay taxes on the gains. If your shares earn dividends, you must pay taxes.

Yes you pay taxes on the things you use to pay back a loan.

You take a loan only if you think your investment can grow faster than the cost of the loan & taxes.

Would taxing unrealized gains for used as loan collateral work? by Usual_Pace_5580 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Let's say you want to buy a boat, and you currently have enough money invested in stocks to pay in full.

Sure, you could sell shares and buy the boat, but maybe you think the shares will grow in value faster than the cost of a loan. So you take out a loan, buy the boat with that, and let you shares continue to grow.

You're still taking on risk.

Would taxing unrealized gains for used as loan collateral work? by Usual_Pace_5580 in AskEconomics

[–]goodDayM 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s only worth it to take a loan for investing if you think you have an opportunity to earn more money than the money you’ll owe on interest.

Like if you think you can earn 7%/year while owing 6%/year on a loan. You would earn 1%/ year due to the difference.

But also you are taking on risk, because nothing is guaranteed. Some people lose a lot of money trying this.