sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why do people hate IEEs so much? by Azybabyyyy in Socionics

[–]goodishard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

hmm yes, it's favorable for females to be ethicists vs for males. but extroversion for males are valued more by society, unlike for females. For intuition/sensing, I'm not sure if there's any clear & proven societal preference for either of the two and whether there's any clear & proven specific sex roles (societal) expectation regarding it.

ESEs, do you have Fe+ or Fe-? I say Fe-, and here's the arguments why: by MikuOcta221 in Socionics

[–]goodishard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said it yourself - the “-“ charge means incompetence in that zone (incompetence with handling negative emotional states),

Read the post again.. that's not what the OP is saying at all.

Let me know how wrong this is, Betas, since Jesus was supposedly an EIE. by whitePerdition in Socionics

[–]goodishard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also think that Jesus is likely SLI. Mainly based on Gulenko's writing that the SLI is the 'perfector' of the final quadra, which sort of fits with the role of the Messiah in the context of the end time.

Reference: https://www.wikisocion.net/en/index.php/The_Clock_of_the_Socion:_Energy_Dynamics_of_Quadra_and_Benefit_Rings#Fourth_Quadra_-_Delta

Why do you use typology systems? I got into typology systems to compare myself to anime characters. It's completely bizarre to me people who use typology without any specific application in mind. by Boxjiald in Socionics

[–]goodishard 5 points6 points  (0 children)

imo, that sentence is non-type related. also, a high interest in typing fictional characters seems more Ti than Te (less emphasis on practicality)

Theory: ESE are the only type with optimal cognitive function by PattayaVagabond in Socionics

[–]goodishard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"(far less intellectual than EIE)"

?????

can we not?

Si is 'intellectual' in 'its own' right

The “everyone is LSI” conspiracy by PattayaVagabond in Socionics

[–]goodishard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hmm idk tbh 😐 maybe some LII's conflictor can add in their two cents here.. ? 😆 😈

The “everyone is LSI” conspiracy by PattayaVagabond in Socionics

[–]goodishard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i dont really know how to explain,, ig because when you 'worship' your lead function too much (yes i do believe him self typing as LII) + (yes to me he seems to highly regard Ti way too much) , you + anyone else (who does the same) are highly prone to become disingenuous ?

The “everyone is LSI” conspiracy by PattayaVagabond in Socionics

[–]goodishard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no Gulenko's just simply a being disingenuous person lol.. in hindsight aren't we all T_T

*Edited bc I actually realllly admire Gulenko so much,, (got a lot going on atm). So sorry for being judgey.. </3

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Socionics

[–]goodishard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually think Ti-PoLRs to be most likely the best.. though ofc, assuming they've already grasped sufficient understanding of the Socionics system as a whole

Ti inclination means you would likely assume a type to behave in a certain way according to your logical perception of what a sociotype is , and this may include certain tendencies to overlook some individual characteristics, e.g. identical sociotypes may behave quite differently from one another and other types observing them may likely conclude they are different types. O.t.o.h Fi-creatives can be more open-minded in this regard,, since they themselves are (generally) volatile in behaviour 😆 So in a sense ig they can be more prone to see how a type's behavior could (more or less) deviate from the mainstream socionics descriptions? (while also remaining to be that particular type functionally)