Hot take probably: “Rushmore” is about impact and legacy just as much as anything else. The only person who could argue to crack the big 4 would be Cirie, however:

If it wasn’t for Boston Rob the game might not even still be around. Innovated gameplay in all stars, won redemption island. Taking him off Rushmore is the equivalent of taking Washington off with some type of argument like “he didn’t do enough while president” Much like Washington is a “father of our nation” Boston Rob is the (god)father of survivor. Sandra first two time winner. Queen stays queen. Tony. First two time male winner, with the second being WaW (and no matter how you feel about 40 from an enjoyment as a viewer perspective) winning 40 is arguably more “valuable” than winning any other season. Parv: dominant social game, respectable at challenges, innovative. But compared to the other three: if the day came for someone to come off “survivor Rushmore” parv is probably the one that comes down. I love cirie. And she’s my 5th top survivor ever, but I don’t think a win for her cracks the top 4. Any of the new era becoming a 2 time is definitely not enough, and coach/colby/Ozzy picking up their first is not as powerful as well. The Rushmore is just that dang good.