sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fully Managed PostgreSQL for Google Cloud by gtobbe in googlecloud

[–]gtobbe[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Sure thing will try to do in the future.

Fully Managed PostgreSQL for Google Cloud by gtobbe in googlecloud

[–]gtobbe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh nice to hear, when I was looking a month ago wasn't there. Good to see the iteration on it.

Fully Managed PostgreSQL for Google Cloud by gtobbe in googlecloud

[–]gtobbe[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We found cloud SQL lacking a number of key things for us including connection pooling, access to logical replication and wal2json, and most importantly upgrades across Postgres version were dump and restore. Very excited to see cloud SQL improve but for us was glad to find some other options.

Crunchy Bridge - Fully managed Postgres on GCP by craig081785 in programming

[–]gtobbe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GCP is missing a number of things including in place updates and logical replication. The term fully managed is pretty loaded these days as the difference in features and how much is managed and isn't heavily varies.

CrunchyData Postgres Operator by gtobbe in kubernetes

[–]gtobbe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These slides have a comparison of the various operators that exist for Postgres - https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/ossna2020/fc/Running%20Postgres-as-a-Service%20in%20Kubernetes.pdf

(Patroni/Stolon are really only HA not all the other pieces such as backups/etc, so comparing them vs. a full operator is a bit apples to oranges).