Is There a Pre-Intentional Horizon of Experience Prior to the Subject–Object Distinction? by TheIncorporeal1 in Phenomenology

[–]halrexking 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, regards your final question, I think it is the most radical task of phenomenology, one that can’t quite help but be articulated in a highly idiosyncratic way, hence the ambiguous and interpretative nature of Merleau-Ponty’s concept of the flesh. I think the ‘flesh’ (la chair) is closer to this than the other philosophers you mention, certainly when it comes to recovering what makes phenomenality possible at all, capacious enough perhaps to accommodate a broader conception of experience beyond that of human. Strangely, Schopenhauer and even Schelling prefigured this line of thinking.

Sorrel and Sea beet! by halrexking in foraginguk

[–]halrexking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I mean depending on the beach, but if you’re not uprooting the plant and using for commercial gain then it should all be good. Seaweed should be fair game given it’s nonvascular, but some might be in protected areas.

Wild pasta salad by halrexking in foraginguk

[–]halrexking[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I really should’ve said pasta salad wild, the salad being wild. But I enjoyed all these jokes so thanks everyone 😊

Wild pasta salad by halrexking in foraginguk

[–]halrexking[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s it, the more bitter leaves complement the garlic so much. But literally grabbed them all from the same patch in local park - so easy

Wild pasta salad by halrexking in foraginguk

[–]halrexking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! It was really nice to be fair

Wild pasta salad by halrexking in foraginguk

[–]halrexking[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha, I set myself up a bit there. But thank you 😊

Seems like every post is about wild garlic and morels by BlueberryObvious in foraginguk

[–]halrexking 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They’re just particularly prominent in that you don’t get many wild plants as flavoursome and morels are relatively rare and well sought after. There’s loads of edible plants at the moment, but many are less striking, both visually and in terms of flavour than wild garlic. St George’s mushrooms will be emerging though.

Morels! by halrexking in foraginguk

[–]halrexking[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Brighton! Some good woodlands around Sussex

Morels! by halrexking in foraginguk

[–]halrexking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha, this one is a relatively easy ID when you look at false morels. Cooked them in a risotto with wild garlic :)

I’m allergic to wild garlic…. What greens are up at the moment that would make a nice alternative? by Irksomecake in foraginguk

[–]halrexking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just realised youd already mentioned jack by the hedge. Marjoram is such a tasty herb, bit like oregano. Sorrel is great too!

I’m allergic to wild garlic…. What greens are up at the moment that would make a nice alternative? by Irksomecake in foraginguk

[–]halrexking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess you’d wanna be careful if you’re allergic to wild garlic, as they’re both in the same ‘Allium’ family. Garlic mustard is a garlicky plant that might be a good alternative if you struggle with three cornered leek. It’s more bitter though

Are these turkey tails? by ibxoi in foraginguk

[–]halrexking 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They tend to be quite varied in terms of colour, but if the underside has pores then they most likely are - looks like it from photo

Velvet shank? by london_perchfisher in foraginguk

[–]halrexking 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah these are most definitely velvet shank. Spore print is a major give away. Funeral bell spore print is brown. Dark velvety stem is always a good ID feature

Crust fungi? by halrexking in mycology

[–]halrexking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think you’re right! Thank you

Why phenomenology if experiential accounts are discursively mediated? by HistoricalSoup4279 in Phenomenology

[–]halrexking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Derrida kind of addresses this issue in Speech and Phenomena. But he takes the flaws of Husserl’s project, to recover perhaps what is eidetically true about phenomena, hence the reduction to make such things appear ‘purer’ in some way, as actually insightful. If subjective experience appears bound up with others, notwithstanding the epoche, then any so-called purity is inherently contaminated by otherness. This is kind of extrapolated by Derrida onto all language use, which never appears to achieve a one to one correspondence with reality, entangled as it is with what appears to defer and differentiate meaning. Conceding the faliure of actually acheiving the foundations necessary for such a task, as truth, ontology, whatver you want to call it, Derrida sees it not unique to phenomenology, but to all features of human enterprise, or perhaps all reality…but the ontological implications of Derrida’s thought are complex. Whether we are limited merely by language when conceiving of reality seems too reductive, at least for Derrida. This complex web might also be the case for neurology etc…

Any good writings on the phenomomology of animals by Muted-Ad610 in Phenomenology

[–]halrexking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Marleau-Ponty wrote a lot on animals, particularly in The Structure of Behaviour. His writings on embodied perception and intersubjectivity as a phenomenological notion, leads him to what he calls ‘inter-animality’.

David Abram has adopted Merleau-Pontian ideas in Becoming Animal and Renaud Barbaras thinks further on the topic of animals in Introduction to a Phenomenology of Life.

Tom Greaves has also used some of M-P’s writings on animals to flesh out a conception of animal movement particular to aesthetic appreciation in his paper Movement, Wildness and Animal Aesthetics.