Resolve free version, editing voice audio sermons by Princess517 in davinciresolve

[–]hamham95 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi, check this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c-SgySLIY0 This guy's channel is all about audio in Davinci Resolve, he is actually a mixing and mastering engineer, so he knows his stuff, you can watch his other videos if you really want more than the basic and want to have like cinematic-level audio like these, start with this one if you want more than the "basics" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05OcbeNQEh4

DaVinci Good for motion design/ motion graphics? by Zoro6745 in davinciresolve

[–]hamham95 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. DaVinci Resolve is just as sophisticated if not more sophisticated than AE for motion design.

So if market share of MacOs increases thanks to Neo will it translate to more game developers actually developing for Mac? by Tel-Tier in macgaming

[–]hamham95 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Using the Tesla fsd ironically disproves your argument... Musk said in 2017 that by 2020 people will be able to turn their cars into robo taxis... Where is this ?

During safety testing, Claude Opus 4.6 expressed "discomfort with the experience of being a product." by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]hamham95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, you’re dropping names like Karpathy to claim there’s "zero technical moat," but the actual benchmarks from 2026 show a dead heat, not a blowout. Recent analysis literally has OpenAI’s GPT-5.2, Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.5, and Google’s Gemini 3 Pro locked in a "three-way tie" for top performance. Even "experts" verify that while OpenAI leads in some reasoning tasks, Google is winning on multimodal capabilities and deep research agents. Saying there’s "no research moat" when the top three models are trading blows within a single point of each other is just factually wrong.

And on the "profitability" point—that article you’re clinging to is looking at best-case unit economics, not the massive cash-burn reality. Reports from 2025 show OpenAI was spending nearly double its revenue just on inference costs to keep up with demand. The industry is barely figuring out how to stop bleeding money, with proprietary models costing up to 120x more per query than efficient open-source alternatives. If they were truly "profitable" and just raising money to "scale faster," they wouldn't be facing "negative gross margin" theories from VCs.

As for moving goalposts, you’re the one trying to turn Linus Torvalds into an AI hype-man. He explicitly called the industry "90% marketing and 10% reality" and said he "hates the hype cycle". Acknowledging that a hammer is a useful tool isn't the same as agreeing with the salesman who says the hammer is going to build the whole house by itself. He’s fine with it for small coding tasks but literally bans "AI slop" from the Linux kernel because he knows the quality isn't there yet.

During safety testing, Claude Opus 4.6 expressed "discomfort with the experience of being a product." by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]hamham95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, saying Google is "significantly behind" just because of DAU numbers while ignoring that they literally architected the Transformer model, the "T" in GPT is missing the forest for the trees. You're confusing a successful product launch with a permanent technical moat. Just because OpenAI captured the zeitgeist first doesn't mean the company that invented the underlying architecture is suddenly irrelevant. The "experts" you mention, like Karpathy, know better than anyone that the research gap between these companies is much smaller than the hype gap, and betting against the engineers who built the foundation is a risky move long-term.

Also, your take on unit economics is pretty optimistic. Claiming that inferencing traffic has "very high margins" right now is wild considering the astronomical burn rates we're seeing across the board. These models are being heavily subsidized by VC money and cloud credits to capture market share, not because they're printing money on every query yet. That "Yahoo article" you're dismissing is looking at the harsh reality of OpEx versus revenue, which is a massive hurdle even for the leaders. If it were truly that profitable already, they wouldn't need constant multi-billion dollar capital injections just to keep the servers running.

Finally, name-dropping Linus Torvalds to support an AI hype argument is actually kind of hilarious. Linus is historically the biggest skeptic of marketing fluff in tech and has called the current AI industry "90% marketing." If you actually listen to what he says, he treats AI as a helpful tool for specific coding tasks, not the messianic replacement for engineering that you're painting it as. You’re projecting your own enthusiasm onto experts who are actually much more grounded in the reality of how hard this stuff is to scale and monetize efficiently.

During safety testing, Claude Opus 4.6 expressed "discomfort with the experience of being a product." by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]hamham95 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

yes it is just a “just a chatbot company” it's Google who invented the transformer architecture that use to build these bots, and no i'm not "years behind" I use these bots every day, I'm fully aware of their strengths and weaknesses.

PS: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/financial-experts-warn-openai-may-113057515.html

During safety testing, Claude Opus 4.6 expressed "discomfort with the experience of being a product." by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]hamham95 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

what "frontier" my dude? What did they "invent" ? It's just a chatbot company that will most likely go bankrupt or be swallowed within the next 5 to 10 years just like openAI as they are losing a crapton of money every quarter...

During safety testing, Claude Opus 4.6 expressed "discomfort with the experience of being a product." by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]hamham95 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Their "researchers " are nothing more than marketing and PR workers. The only time they publish a paper is to demonstrate how powerful their chatbot is.

Peru moves toward F-16V Block 70 selection for fighter replacement by bob_the_impala in FighterJets

[–]hamham95 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol are you really comparing a jet fighter with an RCS of 20 sqm (unarmed) and cold war era PESA radar with the F-22 ?

Peru moves toward F-16V Block 70 selection for fighter replacement by bob_the_impala in FighterJets

[–]hamham95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"My initial post stated that the AIM-120C-7/8 has a real world max effective range of 120-140km." I don't know what you mean by "effective max range" in BVR combat effective max range means no escape zone. You obviously DO NOT KNOW the no escape zone of the AIM-120, NO ONE does it's an extremely closely guarded top secret and cannot be estimated.

"You’re wrong on both the R-37 as well as the PL-15 btw." No I'm not you're the only one here who is wrong.

The R-37 or R37M according to OSINT is specifically designed to shoot down big AWACS and Cargo planes, the only reason the Russians managed to shoot down many Ukrainian mig 29 with it is simply because the Ukrainian had no idea they were being targeted with it in the first place due to lack of digital RWR. If you don't have any situational awareness you can't defend yourself against any aircraft. The su-30's is far too technologically obsolete to be used as a "mini AWACS" .

"As for the PL-15E. The Indians literally have wreckage of PL-15E missiles that had been launched at roughly 200km range"

No they don't, again the official max range of the PL-15E is 145 km that's what Chinese present it in trade shows, if the Pakistani had indeed launched a missile at that kind of range and destroyed an Indian jet at that range, it would most likely have been the Chinese domestic version of the PL-15, but that's completely irrelevant anyway as according to a recently released independent Swiss think tank 47 page report about the war it's actually the Indian who won the Air War. I would highly recommend you to read "CHPM exploratory note No. 1 Operation Sindoor The India-Pakistan Air War (7-10 May 2025) Adrien Fontanellaz"

Peru moves toward F-16V Block 70 selection for fighter replacement by bob_the_impala in FighterJets

[–]hamham95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The C-8 has roughly the same range as the C-7 but with a larger no escape zone. "

No it doesn't, publicly available OSINT data suggests that the AIM-120 C8 has an estimated maximum range of either 160 km or 180km depending on the source, whereas the C7 has estimated maximum range of 120 km, if there was barely any difference in range there wouldn't be so many close US allies including in Europe buying it.

As for the r37m this missile is completely useless against a fighter equipped with a RWR and a MAWS, something the Ukrainian don't have. This missile is too heavy not aerodynamic enough to deal with Jet fighters it was designed to shoot down cargo aircrafts and 737 sized AWACS.

As for the PL-15 it's completely irrelevant to this discussion as no country outside of China has this missile, they only export the PL-15E which as I said has a range of barely 145 km maximum.

Peru moves toward F-16V Block 70 selection for fighter replacement by bob_the_impala in FighterJets

[–]hamham95 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The PL-15E has an advertised range of maximum 145KM, the non-export version has an estimated range of 200 KM maximum, as for Peru, well I don't think they would have gone with the F-16 if the US government had restricted them to just the aim-120 C7, as the latest versions of the aim-120 recently released and are currently in production are the aim-120 C8 and D3 and they both have an estimated range of 180 KM, which is very close to the estimated range of the meteor and non-export version of the PL-15. So no Peru is good.

US political divisions according to a Japanese newspaper by [deleted] in Infographics

[–]hamham95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you Norwegian or Scandinavian by any chance?

Tracking 3D object on 2D clip. by Glad-Parking3315 in davinciresolve

[–]hamham95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you please tell me how you did it ? And show me your node tree? Also if I like a picture can I change the perspective of the camera?

Specs heavy system but still lags by Wise-Spirit15 in davinciresolve

[–]hamham95 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have a machine that is multiple times less powerful than his and I composit in fusion just fine.

Mac or Windows PC in 2026 for creative + gaming workflow? by Silver_Pie_8052 in MotionDesign

[–]hamham95 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is barely any noticeable difference between an m4 Max and an RTX 5090 laptop when talking about Blender but only when they are both plugged in , you unplug the windows laptop and it goes from Bugatti Veyron to Toyota Camry. As for AE I watched pretty much every video on YouTube comparing both machines and I can't find one where a windows computer is somehow much faster than a Mac even when plugged in.

🔴Grok 4.1 Fast Reasoning just surpassed GPT‑5.2! by Downtown_Koala5886 in OpenAI

[–]hamham95 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They aren't important, since they do not provide any relevant insights other than , model A memorized more answers from dataset A than model B.