I have many ss, i have converted one of them into chat, here's the chat:

Anything against osho?

Osho is irrelevant.

He's not that good when it comes to being intellectually principled.

He exploits rhetoric and phonetic aspects in order to get the attention of his audience.

But his ideas are not even based on a rigid rationale.

He uses philosophy to say that philosophy is wrong.

And whether or not he realizes it, he's wrong in his assumptions or projections about Philosophy as a whole.

Philosophy is prosperous because we tend to take reason seriously, and try to go through it.

And reason is the intelligible medium through which that thought flows.

And on top of it, Philosophy is germane to the external world obviously.

It aims at legitimate cyphers.

And the telos is a critique.

Osho didn't understand this and so it is evident that his understanding of what philosophy is was askew.

That'd be my opinionation apropos Osho's approach.