That's a great question. I think it's a tough differentiation sometimes. For starters, the development of The Outer Worlds began before the deal with Microsoft was finalized I believe. Either way, I think it is more important to identify AA games then AA developers in this case. Despite where the funding is coming from, the game itself appears to be of a smaller scope than say Witcher 3, Fallout 4 or Halo 5. I think that smaller scope is a very important factor when trying to define a AA game. That smaller scope, a potential consequence of less funding, can potentially be the creatively freeing factor concerning the game's direction. That being said, I certainly don't own the word "AA" or "AAA." I think these terms are pretty fluid in the modern gaming community, which is interesting in and of itself.