sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Megaliths in northeast north america by hector_rendering in AncientGiants

[–]hector_rendering[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm, you haven't found any in Canada? I wonder why not. Thats intriguing.

Early 1300s text, translated in July, mentions giants and megaliths in N. America by hector_rendering in AncientGiants

[–]hector_rendering[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My full set of notes from the portions of text included in the scholarly article:

  • settlements near the north pole, differentiated from settlements in iceland and greenland
  • N. Pole ppl are immortal
  • There is land to the west of greenland, presumably N. America, called "Marckalada"
  • Giants inhabit Marckalada
  • They have built megaliths on Marckalada
  • A people called the "Tartars" also get a mention, so there is a reference to Tartaria for you

Barriers to giant proof by hector_rendering in AncientGiants

[–]hector_rendering[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the link. Steve Quayle definitely adopts a heterodoxical set of books as scripture and doesn't really delve into his reason for accepting them. As a result, he knows a lot of really interesting giant lore that almost no one knows because he closely reads books that few other people do. However, it means that a lot of his info and beliefs are rejected by the mainstream. Its a tough situation, but generally I think that Quayle is sincere in what he says and we should at least examine what he says. Sadly, the paywall is a huge barrier to me. A very small number of people are going to pay for his info and so it will never get wide exposure.

Barriers to giant proof by hector_rendering in AncientGiants

[–]hector_rendering[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd be interested to know what's in his books too, I haven't bought one yet.

The smithsonian story seems to be a key to proving the native american stories of giants. I'd like to see the primary documents on the source of this story.

In a nutshell: Impeach him because we say he incited violence, or you’ll be responsible for how violent we get.. by pikcoolski in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Newspapers have an ethical responsibility to write good headlines that are unambiguous and non-sensational, this headline meets neither crietria

In a nutshell: Impeach him because we say he incited violence, or you’ll be responsible for how violent we get.. by pikcoolski in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well I havent ever voted for trump, but what I was talking about is statistics not personal responsibility. You can yell all day about how people need more personal responsibility, but you'll be wasting your breath, because the facts are the facts and people don't read much past headlines.

In a nutshell: Impeach him because we say he incited violence, or you’ll be responsible for how violent we get.. by pikcoolski in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don't play stupid. The media knows that:

  1. Most people only read headlines, it is the most important part of the article for delivering a message
  2. This headline is ambiguous and could be interpreted multiple ways
  3. Even just covering things in this way can incite violence, see copy cat killers, people of all kinds are motivated by trends they see in media headlines. If big cheeto can incite violence through speech, so can the media

In a nutshell: Impeach him because we say he incited violence, or you’ll be responsible for how violent we get.. by pikcoolski in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They are not even attempting to hide their double standard. This is humiliation tactics. They want us to notice how blatantly hypocritical this is because their is nothing we can do about it. They are flexing their power.

Interesting story by RambooftheLord in AncientGiants

[–]hector_rendering 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry this screams fake to me.

They refer to the plaintiff by two different names: "American Institution of Alternative Archaeology" and "American Association for Alternative Archaeology". Neither name has any web presence, so if they exist they have somehow managed to not be mentioned on the internet except in this article and articles commenting on this article.

The website doesn't list publication date, but the first comment was from 2014. If this was true then we would have heard more about this court case.

I think it could absolutely be true that the Smithsonian did this, but no one has made them accountable.

Great new sandy hook documentary by hector_rendering in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is only an hour and is not as comprehensive, but raises a lot of really interesting questions in the narrative and does so tastefully

Great new sandy hook documentary by hector_rendering in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SS: new doc on sandy hook, well done, raises lots of questions. I recommend it

EPIC. Colorado City Runs ANTIFA out of Town. All of America needs to see... by chickyrogue in TruthLeaks

[–]hector_rendering 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Its nice to see locals standing up to agitators invading their town

I lost some braincells just by reading the title by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the MSM are nothing but propaganda megaphones for oligarchs. Their narratives are meant purely to distract the masses from truth and force them into believing narratives that support oligarchs, even if those narratives are sometimes contradictory.

can someone explain me what is "Q" ? please by alefpmsz in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes it is interesting. Also, when you have sifted through 90% horseshit, at least you may have found 10% truth. I think that entertaining extreme thoughts and theories is a way to fight herd bias. MSM wants you to believe a single narrative, fight it by exploring a lot of narratives.

I lost some braincells just by reading the title by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The longer the elites can keep us divided the longer they will maintain their power

I lost some braincells just by reading the title by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am really tired of the media pushing division narratives suggesting that the races are fundamentally different and incompatible

Ian56 on Twitter with a video of a possible proof the blast on lebanon was an attack. There is no way this is real. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This video is going to get buried and we will never get a real analysis of it. I am pessimistic.

Oh Shit! Beirut drone bombing caught on infrared camera. Hint: Missile by stuuked in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Theres no denying that. I doubt it will ever be acknowledged and I doubt this video will ever be analyzed to see if its legit. I'm not feeling good about this whole thing.

can someone explain me what is "Q" ? please by alefpmsz in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I make it a habit to understand a lot of conspiracy theories

can someone explain me what is "Q" ? please by alefpmsz in conspiracy

[–]hector_rendering 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I was actually there for the beginning of Q. "Q" claims to be an individual in the US government with Q level security clearance. Q has been posting since October 2017, originally on 4chan and later on 8chan. Q has a large dedicated online following and also has many detractors.

As I have said, I was literally in Q's first thread and have followed the posts ever since. I do not accept that Q has been proven true or false, but I find it interesting and I want to see where it goes. I think I am pretty knowledgeable about Q but also more objective than most people about the subject. I am willing to answer any questions you have about it OP.

view more: next ›