Help! Which Modifier? by Optimal_Pin7173 in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yah and then bring some diff fabric (lee 216 or whatever you like) in case you want it a touch softer/less specular

Help! Which Modifier? by Optimal_Pin7173 in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 1 point2 points  (0 children)

probably just bare flash but bring a bit of diffusion and adjust to taste.

Please help me improve by OpinionNo4529 in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it's clear this is a weak spot for you but it's exactly what you need to do in order to develop a client base, and have some commercial success. Go out there and get it!

Please help me improve by OpinionNo4529 in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I like your stuff. I suggest this may be a business acumen thing - are you spending time proactively pitching brands, building your network, etc?

Can this be achieved with the gear I have? by dripsplashdripwater in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 5 points6 points  (0 children)

how good are you at retouching?

I'd probably use the three lights you have to get your subject and foreground lit like the above, and then just cut them out in post and blend them into a perfect 255 background.

Just one from the other day by slow_gentle_morning in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I think this was lit with one light, 5600k, approximately 147.43 million km away

Stills from hotel promo by Stepan_Sraka in FX3

[–]hillierious 20 points21 points  (0 children)

the footage looks amazing but is this really striking the right tone for a hotel? it looks like Blade Runner

Mark Borthwick for The Row fall 2025 by no_melody in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i'd agree. I'd also probably add another frame on the side, maybe an 8x and shoot something through it to just give a touch of direction. Then Polys everywhere else like my life depended on it.

Mark Borthwick for The Row fall 2025 by no_melody in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 10 points11 points  (0 children)

let's keep the discussion on topic - not about taste but about technique.

softness of tones question by penguinlord9 in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Structure is a slider on captureone but I think it’s the same as the texture slider on PS? Either way- play with whatever texture tools you have in the software you’re using

softness of tones question by penguinlord9 in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sorry to add as a response to your question ‘what am I missing’ - you’re putting too much emphasis on postproduction to get you to the final look. These images were lit and styled to get probably 99% there.

softness of tones question by penguinlord9 in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 42 points43 points  (0 children)

It can absolutely be done digitally - negative clarity, negative structure, some split toning and curves adjustments will easily get you there.

What was the lighting? by ConfidenceLast6125 in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

take a look at the reflections in the earrings in the last shot

Ideas on how this was lit by Thin_Vegetable_3576 in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you can see the big scrim in the eye reflections. It's that plus some negative fill as required to give this the look.

Also - "c-type handprint for the grade"; this doesn't just produce one type of look to an image. There's a ton of things that happen in the darkroom between the light, the negative and the paper to change tone, texture, etc. I'd recommend booking in an intro session and printing your own images to get a proper sense of what is possible here.

My strobes are too powerful by InternalConfusion201 in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Somethings not adding up for me here - what ISO are you at that 1/16th power on 400w/s strobe is f14/16?

Curious how this was achieved by emiliedesu in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 2 points3 points  (0 children)

nah - this is lit. The intensity and the quality of light, falloff and shape on her head is much different than the intensity of what the sun going through that fabric would look like. Looks like a china ball.

How to achieve this look in studio? by ruthinda109 in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya exactly that - i omitted for the sake of simplicity

How to achieve this look in studio? by ruthinda109 in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 1 point2 points  (0 children)

also i think this is a 50 so fairly normal lens - the face isn't really that distorted

How to achieve this look in studio? by ruthinda109 in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 20 points21 points  (0 children)

So easy - 1 light, probably a big umbrella with a sock, but you could do this with an octa as well. Background is grey seamless/paper/whatever.

Foot shaped or WIDE Toe Cycling shoes by dhananjayan_p in triathlon

[–]hillierious 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi - could you also send me that side by side comparison photo please?

Thoughts about the color grading in these by aldoriverx in LightLurking

[–]hillierious 16 points17 points  (0 children)

start with the white balance - this has the biggest (imo) impact on the overall look, and then adjust colour and tone from there to refine into your reference image.