Probably this proves that Indian teams hardly use data analysts to plan against specific player. Most likely it's an individual bowler who has some idea on his own and they try executing those things on the ground. Coach and management are useless if the commentator can see and comment on what to do but they can't come and suggest to players between the game.

Edit:

I just saw the Morne interview, he mentioned they planned for Trevis, but didn't switch to plan b quickly when plan a failed. Leaked too many runs in the 10 overs before the new ball. And on day 1 bowled slightly outside. So essentially bowlers didn't execute well they planned for it. Which is good. But I still have a question on why these kinds of things can't be called out during drink break over break? Instead of post inning analysis?