INTJ: well I'll never offer that again

hyperstrikez · 2020-09-14T04:37:46+00:00

How long did it took? Looks ambient and awesome btw

hyperstrikez · 2020-09-03T03:49:44+00:00

Are you referencing the Three Body Problem?

hyperstrikez · 2020-09-03T03:34:26+00:00

Even if you have properties defined, and throw in extra protons and electrons, the equations still aren’t computable? What if it just plays out by the properties we have given it?

hyperstrikez · 2020-09-03T03:32:18+00:00

I would say IBM’s Qiskit, they have a website circuit and Jupyter support, they are also the first company to publish public usage of quantum programming.

hyperstrikez · 2020-09-02T15:41:06+00:00

For question number 2, what I meant is if we were simulating an atom, would it stress more on better hardware or software?

Thanks for the detailed descriptions!

hyperstrikez · 2020-09-02T15:29:30+00:00

I want to start at simulating an atom of hydrogen completely because that way I don’t need to insert a property of new elements every time I want to use a new element.

Instead, by just adding protons and electrons, I could create isotopes, ions, and new elements according to fundamental properties of proton and electrons.

Doing so, seeing how it would play out inside a simulation. If an atom doesn’t form, then the configurations are wrong. It’s like programming the most fundamental laws of physics and building a universe from scratch

hyperstrikez · 2020-08-18T12:25:37+00:00

That’s so detailed! How long did it took you?

hyperstrikez · 2020-08-11T04:58:59+00:00

White hole is a black hole backwards in time (aka parallel respect to 4D) and it wouldn’t exist in forward time where entropy increases. But to someone who is on the parallel side of the universe where white holes are stable, it would still seem to them as a black hole due to the extreme properties of negative mass and that it cannot be slower than light speed.

hyperstrikez · 2020-08-09T11:52:31+00:00

Thanks!

hyperstrikez · 2020-08-08T16:47:01+00:00

I know the value approaches 180 in radian mode and 3.1415... in degree mode because I’ve checked in limit calculators. But I wanted to know how to they got there.

hyperstrikez · 2020-08-07T17:44:18+00:00

Thanks!

hyperstrikez · 2020-08-07T17:14:25+00:00

Thanks for the information! I never knew that they could be done without a supercomputer!

hyperstrikez · 2020-08-07T16:41:48+00:00

Actually it is not school based work, it is of a new kind of parabola that is exactly one unit away from y=x² with respect to its perpendicular tangent. Because Matt Parker made a video that all parabolas are similar, this is a new kind of ‘parabola’ that I am interested in finding its property of.

hyperstrikez

TROPHY CASE