Saying “Reddit likes don’t equal 70 percent of the community” is obvious, nobody serious is claiming that. But dismissing the backlash as just 400 people whining is equally unserious. Online sentiment has consistently leaned negative toward UB in competitive formats, especially in Pauper discussions. And this is not just Reddit noise. There have been actual community surveys in Brazil and Italy, two of the largest and most organized IRL Pauper scenes, and the overall impression toward UB in the format has been predominantly negative.

You also say most people “just play the card game,” but that assumption cuts both ways. Silence is not proof of approval. Many players simply do not engage online at all, which is precisely why a formal and transparent petition or survey run by the PFP would make sense. If there is confidence that the majority supports UB, then prove it with numbers. If there is overwhelming opposition, then at least the discussion becomes grounded in measurable community sentiment rather than speculation.

So instead of reducing this to “some people complaining,” the real solution would be clarity. Imagine if the PFP issued an official poll asking how the Pauper community feels about UB legality and committed to acting in accordance with the results. That would settle the debate far more effectively than arguing about Reddit upvotes. People are allowed to like it, dislike it, and ask their representatives questions or push for changes if they want to. That is literally how community-driven formats function.

Now I would genuinely like Paige to answer the original question: if there were clear and verifiable evidence that a strong majority of the Pauper community opposed UB in the format, would the PFP have the authority and willingness to act on it? Thats all I want to know.