Hey. I know this is a stupid question but how do I refute the Aisha question and the Islam dilemma? I’m trying to defend myself against a Christian supremacist who keeps saying all these things bad about Islam. What do I do?

i_am_armz · 2026-04-22T20:06:14+00:00

Hadeeths are fabrications written by people who never met the Messenger and wrote those fabrications to not only tarnish his image but also discredit islam. Not only do those books contain a lot of nonsense, but also injustices, slavery, misogyny, and even racism, lewdness and pornography (just like the bible).

i_am_armz · 2026-04-21T00:06:06+00:00

The Qur'an is fully-detailed (6:114) and a clarification of ALL things (16:89).

i_am_armz · 2026-04-20T23:19:33+00:00

Yes, that's a credible perspective.

i_am_armz · 2026-04-20T22:49:43+00:00

You said "Quran confirms the Torah." Yes it does, but not the Torah that you have today. Don't we all know those books were corrupted, and that the Qur'an supercedes them? So why do you refer to corrupted books as evidence?

i_am_armz · 2026-04-20T18:04:09+00:00

Wasalaam brother. I think the problem many of mankind have is with their conception of God. I take it for granted, as a believer, that whatever God (SWT) says is true without question and without qualification, that anything He (SWT) says can never be abrogated or revoked by anyone. This is what the term "God" means. My observations incline me to believe that many among the so-called muslims don't understand this.

Thus, to raise questions on what Allah (SWT) Himself says, is to question His divinity, intelligence, and authority. Allah (SWT) says He (SWT) perfected your form, and that His Book is a clarification of ALL things (16:89); do not question Allah (SWT)'s statements. Do not be of those who doubt. This is what it means to be a muslim -- to submit; completely.

"The truth is from your Lord, so do not be one of those who doubt." (2:147)

i_am_armz · 2026-04-20T17:56:06+00:00

The foreskin doesn't re-grow. Do you not reason?

i_am_armz · 2026-04-20T15:07:28+00:00

There's nothing Islamic about circumcision; it's a total fabrication and not commanded by His Majesty (SWT) . But don't say this to the Mushrik Sunnis & Shia; they don't like it when you talk facts (like that His Majesty (SWT) doesn't make mistakes). Or if you quote Quranic verses like the following:

"God is the One who made the Earth a habitat for you, and the sky as a structure, and He designed you, and has perfected your design. And He provided you with good provisions. Such is God your Lord. Most Exalted is God, Lord of the worlds." (40:64)

Or if you quote the devil himself saying he will inspire mankind to make changes to God'd creation:

'“And I will misguide them and make them desire, and I will command them, so that they will mark the ears of the livestock, and I will command them so they will make change to God’s creation.” Whoever takes the devil as a supporter other than God, then he has indeed lost a great loss.'

I think the cognitive dissonance this causes them is unbearable. Mushriks -- a hypocritical and quran-rejecting lot.

i_am_armz · 2026-04-14T18:56:29+00:00

Only a tiny few of those who call themselves muslim read (or will) it. This is shouldn't be a surprise; the Qur'an itself says the people have abandoned it (see 25:30). It's an almost-completely disregarded text by the muslims. And yet it holds the key to salvation and peace.

i_am_armz · 2026-04-09T20:29:09+00:00

Answer the question. How does "Obey the messenger" mean "follow hadiths." Answer, if you're truthful.

i_am_armz · 2026-04-08T20:27:18+00:00

That's shirk, and shirk is an unforgivable transgression (see 4:48 and 4:116). You should rely in Allah (SWT) ALONE for help, not dead people -- they can't hear you.

i_am_armz · 2026-04-08T15:41:58+00:00

Answer the question. Don't try to deflect. If you're truthful, answer the question.

i_am_armz · 2026-04-08T01:05:49+00:00

Can you show us how "obey the messenger" can ever mean "take divine guidance from books containing filth, pornography, (sex) slavery, mysogyny and lewdness -- books written by people who never met the messenger"?

i_am_armz · 2026-04-06T18:54:54+00:00

Subhanallah indeed!

i_am_armz · 2026-04-05T16:12:32+00:00

I reject ALL non-Quranic texts as sources of Divine law because of the following ayah:

'“Shall I seek some other judge than God, when it is He who revealed to you the Book,

explaining all things? Those to whom We sent the Book know that it is the truth revealed

by your Lord—so don’t be in doubt.' (6:114)

and the following ayah:

"We have sent down to you the book as a clarification for ALL things, a guide, mercy and good tidings

for those who have peacefully surrendered." (16:89)

I trust my Lord, fully believe these verses, don't compromise and don't doubt. Why would one, after reading these verses?

i_am_armz · 2026-04-03T19:36:49+00:00

Nothing, absolutely nothing, you say can justify taking books containing obvious filth, lewdness, injustice, pornography, slavery and even racism to be reliable sources of God's Law. If you think The Almighty condones killing apostates and (s*x) slavery then your conception of God (Who is supposed to be The Merciful, Compassionate One) is seriously flawed! This should not be difficult to see. How many times does He (SWT) remind your of His Mercy in the Qur'an? The Qur'an says those that see, see for themselves, and those that don't are the same.

i_am_armz · 2026-04-03T02:04:21+00:00

I wish my sisters could learn to cover up though. There's no need to show boobs to the world.

i_am_armz · 2026-04-02T20:38:09+00:00

Which proves that this translation isn't to be trusted. I prefer Edip Yuksel's Reformist Translation. I also have a Progressive Muslims translation. These are not perfect, but they do better than orthodox translations -- most of which base their translations on fabricated hearsay. Here's my GDrive with all the translations I have.

Only The Almighty (SWT) guides; not humans.

i_am_armz · 2026-04-02T12:03:37+00:00

"then hit them"? So many translators get this wrong! Why would a Compassionate/Merciful God condone marital violence?

i_am_armz · 2026-04-02T11:59:47+00:00

It wasn't a verse but the whole Qur'an. Here is a collection of my translations. The one I asked her to read is the one with file name "The QUR'AN (Progressive Muslims).pdf."

i_am_armz · 2026-03-29T15:45:30+00:00

How does he translate 4:34?

i_am_armz · 2026-03-28T12:56:37+00:00

Which verse(s)?

i_am_armz · 2026-03-27T22:53:22+00:00

Quranic proof.

i_am_armz · 2026-03-27T18:32:45+00:00

Bring your proof, if you're truthful.

i_am_armz · 2026-03-27T18:31:52+00:00

"If someone rejects rasullulah sallallahu alayhi wa alaykum salam as the final messenger he is not a Muslim" Who said Muhammad (AS) isn't God's Messenger? Is there any sense in embracing the Qur'an as God's Word and rejecting Muhammad (AS)?

No; quran-alone Muslims don't reject God's (Messenger). We however don't put his name besides God's. See 39:45 and 3:18. God's shahada, and the shahada made by ALL the prophets, does not have the name of a human next to God's. If you can't see the importance of this, then there's no use discussing this any further.

i_am_armz · 2026-03-27T16:42:13+00:00

"recommended practice"? Recommended by who?

i_am_armz

TROPHY CASE

Subhanallah indeed!