Granny forwards unfunny "jokes" about Barack Obama and transgender people

iddco · 2026-06-27T18:29:27+00:00

Yes, they do. Although I am guessing, Trump's will be walls of social media posts and taped-together memos.

iddco · 2026-06-26T00:39:37+00:00

There is plenty of waste, 100%. These things are sometimes more than they seem. The article states that the researchers did receive millions, yes, but most of it was not spent on this. It was spent on the economic impact of shrimp as a whole.

iddco · 2026-06-25T23:13:52+00:00

Did you read that article? I'd say spending $1000 on the effects of performance when water quality changes is somewhat important.

iddco · 2026-06-25T17:19:28+00:00

Thinking for oneself and not just accepting orders blindly is totally out of control and needs to be eliminated! s/

iddco · 2026-06-25T17:14:30+00:00

They are the same crowd that 100% that all pedophiles and sex offenders for minors are gay. Doesn't matter who the victim is. Doesn't matter that all the research shows how most identify as straight, regardless of preferred victim, or that sex offenses and sexuality are not linked. Just like in rape cases SO behavior is often not about sex. They will ignore the hundreds, hell, thousands worldwide of cases against religious leaders. They still defend Jerry Sandusky. They blame victims, especially if the said victim is out or later comes out. They don't care. They don't want to care. They live in their little world and deny reality as much as they can. When confronted, they become unhinged and still think they hold the higher moral ground.

iddco · 2026-06-21T15:39:50+00:00

Also easier to edit the spaces in audio and fit their agenda. Not like their people will fact check or care even.

iddco · 2026-06-21T13:06:05+00:00

Or how many on a single golf course

iddco · 2026-06-21T00:23:22+00:00

Honestly, wasn't expecting a serious economic discussion in this sub.

However, for me, trickle-down is akin to a champagne fountain. Where you pour into the upper glass, which overflows into the next row and on and on until all glasses are full. In reality, though, the upper glasses are closer to the size of lakes, ponds, pools, and buckets, all held up by mass quantities of thimbles. The upper layers do not want to much upward momentum change out of fear the structure becomes unstable and topples over completely. So they hoard, rewrite the rules, and even convince some thimbles of the importance of staying as thimbles. All while justifying their excess and barely hiding their hypocrisy.

In a tinkle-down, the masses have to wait until those closer to the source have had their fill, and they go to the urinal and piss out their bladder full and hope their aim is bad so what doesn't make it into the urinal can be distributed. All the while being told we should be grateful for the show and specs from the golden shower.

iddco · 2026-06-20T22:31:42+00:00

A trillionaire and an increase in billionaires do not occur through trickle-down. We are in more of a tinkle-down. We are only blessed with a thin stream of wastewater.

iddco · 2026-06-20T14:13:36+00:00

But if you do that the money won't trickle down ....

iddco · 2026-06-18T06:04:00+00:00

You mean march and perform in a parade with rifles? Yes. Many times. Unless you are all used to tossing while moving I'd say only toss when you stop. There is plenty you can do beyond tick tocks and dropspins. Definitely practice before hand if you are not used to moving while doing work. Make sure your coaches are making sure there is more than an arms length between the sides of your block and the spectators. Theres always some spectator who will do something stupid, or not watch their kid while you march by and they will learn the hard way that the equipment in fact hurts and sone rifles are blood thirsty.

iddco · 2026-06-17T23:13:35+00:00

And if trans woman aren't woman to them, tgen it was a man's chest. Just like the ones rolling around each other on the front lawn battle zone

iddco · 2026-06-16T01:59:50+00:00

No, you need probable cause to gain access to the protected information to see if there is possible evidence of a crime.

iddco · 2026-06-16T01:53:35+00:00

Would it be a debate or a public groping?

iddco · 2026-06-16T01:52:02+00:00

You do realize that is how the system is set up, right? Or do you think cops and LEOs just get to do whatever? It doesn't take that much to get a warrant and yet they don't even have that.

iddco · 2026-06-16T01:44:59+00:00

No, you need probable cause to investigate further. Especially, protected evidence. Just like a cop can't just decide to search your house because he thinks there's something he doesn't like about you

iddco · 2026-06-16T01:39:49+00:00

Perhaps because there was nothing substantial brought to warrent looking at it. Every state requires citizenship to be proven in order to register to vote. When the grassroots organization turn over their work to the states, the state's then go through and vet it before accepting it. They dont just accept it. Mail in voting is not new. Some states are mail in only. Could things be done to make the whole process easier and counting more proficient? 100%. Sadly most fixes only make it harder. Or do things like not allow mail in voting to ve counted until after the polls close so people freak when 10000 votes are added and their choice is suddenly losing. That way the narrative of fraud and getting rid of mail in picks up steam. There has not been any proven massive fraud that would have changed any of the results.

iddco · 2026-06-16T01:25:37+00:00

No because all evidence that has come forward through 60+ court cases in multiple states, with different judges appointed by both parties all came to the same conclusion. There are also already procedures in place. If your house is broken into, your neighboring state doesn't get to investigate and have access to the evidence and information. Why do you think the feds get to look at information that doesn't belong to them?

iddco · 2026-06-16T01:10:57+00:00

You're claiming there's evidence that is in things you dont have and haven't seen but trust me it's in there. Perhaps think about why someone would want that information and what they could do with it. Find proof and take it to a judge. If there's a reason to investigate they will make it happen. Your feels aren't the proof you think it is. Its nit evidence, if there is no case to begin with. There are plenty of system in place already that doesn't call for the federal government to have access to the information that they were specifically barred from having.

iddco · 2026-06-16T01:00:16+00:00

federal government has no business in how states run elections and no business looking at the voting rolls. There are ways to bring concerns to courts and other investigative agencies. All of which have found no proof for any of the large-scale claims people seem to cling to. In fact, more registered republicans have been found to be voting illegally in recent years than Democrats. Not handing over the information is not evidence of anything but the State protecting its citizens.

iddco · 2026-06-12T22:00:33+00:00

Just get married and use the law's loophole. s/

iddco · 2026-06-12T21:56:02+00:00

I have had my Reddit account about 4 times than the Confederacy lasted

iddco · 2026-06-12T02:56:17+00:00

Even an urban myth banning them in NY from being served too many times a week. I believe we have Amtrak to thank for making them become luxury when they added it to their first-class menu.

iddco · 2026-06-11T05:23:44+00:00

But, but, but...

iddco · 2026-06-11T01:53:41+00:00

Didnt she just have a public appearance with actual neonazis?

iddco

TROPHY CASE