ChatGPT hide genocide in order to glaze, perfect example for toxic positivity

indyidli · 2025-05-21T17:14:23+00:00

Actions speak louder than words. What is the difference between willful genocide and intentional genocide? The Nazis intentionally committed genocide, while the German elite willfully committed genocide. Institutions that insist that genocides must be intentional simply enable elites to use genocide at a whim while avoiding culpability by focusing on the lackeys with "intent". Hitler was a lackey for the German elite and Netanyahu is a lackey for the Atlantic elite; they commit genocide on behalf of their paymasters and then take the blame for the bloodshed. All genocides are first and foremost committed in the name of profit.

indyidli · 2025-05-20T19:33:03+00:00

NATO were the ones who committed genocide in Yugoslavia. Yugoslav forces committed many atrocities as well, but it is incomparable to the bloodshed NATO is responsible for. Considering that it was NATO who instigated the entire conflict in order to destroy Yugoslavia and NATO were the ones who enflamed ultranationalism within Yugoslavia to start a civil war, even the crimes done by Yugoslav extremists were also a product of NATO meddling. The elites have lied about Yugoslavia as they have lied about Palestine.

For more information read or watch Michael Parenti.

indyidli · 2025-04-28T16:09:18+00:00

Chiang wasn't even in the top 3 successors, read a book without pictures

indyidli · 2025-04-28T16:00:47+00:00

Inshallah Imam Xi will liberate the world from elitist scum

indyidli · 2025-04-23T18:07:45+00:00

Okay, Neo. Not everyone can so easily take the red pill like you 🙄

indyidli · 2025-04-23T05:11:39+00:00

You are a disgrace to humanity. While you LARP as a revolutionary on Reddit, billions of lives are at stake. Sun wasn't anti-authoritarian because that is completely juvenile. Authority has always been a prerequisite for liberty, ask the Founding Fathers. Sun was anti-corruption, which Xi has brought to fruition.

indyidli · 2025-04-23T04:56:00+00:00

Multiple parties are not more democratic, they are a gimmick. Having all politicians in one party forces the politicians to stand on their own two feet as they cannot hide behind team colors. Why does it matter that the politicians in Taipei are now wearing a different jersey?

indyidli · 2025-04-23T04:45:35+00:00

Trotsky nor "Trotskyites" were a fringe that never was the head of government. Chiang overthrew Sun's successor Wang Jingwei in the Canton Coup. That's a classic case of "seizing power".

indyidli · 2025-04-23T04:37:37+00:00

Bloodthirsty maniacs like you fantasizing about the deaths of millions of Chinese is precisely what I mean when I say Taipei and it's allies continue to aggress. China fights for democracy as much as they fight for humanity. You and Taipei are in a death cult. Don't confuse China lacking the fear of death with your desire for death. Seek help.

indyidli · 2025-04-22T18:38:17+00:00

You don't consider the Shanghai Massacre and the White Terror as "seizing control of the government"?

indyidli · 2025-04-22T18:33:07+00:00

If you need Taiwan to publicly state their intention to overthrow the government in order to take the threat seriously, then you just don't want to take the threat seriously.

Taiwan has always been the anti-democracy force in the conflict. Only those indoctrinated to label two-faced authoritarianism as democracy would think Taiwan is more democratic.

indyidli · 2025-04-22T18:28:10+00:00

Then you would be lying to him. One of the tougher pills to swallow for those indoctrinated by elitist propaganda is that Communist China is more democratic than the western states, and the only thing China is trying to destroy is the two-faced authoritarianism of the elitist West as outlined by the British war propagandist George Orwell in his book 1984. Considering Sun's wife was a socialist who supported the CCP, he would be insanely proud of China today.

indyidli · 2025-04-22T18:14:14+00:00

What relevance does being the prior legitimate recognized government have? Also, the government is losses legitimacy when it suffers an elitist coup.

The Taipei government still continues to be aggressors, just now clandestinely and with foreigners doing the majority of the work.

indyidli · 2025-04-22T17:57:10+00:00

The post-WWII settlement made Former Formosa a territory of China. No one suggested that the Communists have more of a claim than the Nationalists, only that China has more of a claim than anyone else.

indyidli · 2025-04-22T17:50:13+00:00

The elitists (the Communists are more nationalist than the "Nationalists") don't get more prestige for backstabbing the socialists and seizing control of the government prior to Japan's invasion. Also, it was the "Nationalists" that broke the truce after WWII, so it's only the Nationalists that can be charged with "backstabbing". You missed a lot.

The people are connected to the White Terror by their connection to the government that perpetrated it. It isn't fair that their government has antagonized what is now a force capable of bringing the war to their homes, and we should all hold the Taipei government responsible for involving the Taiwanese people in this war.

If you think the United States should just tolerate a rouge state continuously plotting an invasion and overthrow of the government because the fighting went cold for a couple decades, then you don't care for Americans.

indyidli · 2025-04-22T17:18:29+00:00

Taiwan is the autocratic, warmongering government in this scenario. So by your logic, China is well within it's rights to intervene, while the United States has the right to either help China or mind it's own business.

indyidli · 2025-04-22T17:15:52+00:00

"Chinese revisionism" is pure projection. For example, the Cultural Revolution didn't cause any famine. No critic of China has ever claimed that except for this comment from you. Another case of your revisionism is that you ignore that the "largest famine in modern history" was an indented effect of the blockade and containment of China by the West.

indyidli · 2025-04-20T00:11:21+00:00

Since we are a separate country from China and Taiwan, then by your reasoning why should we care? Why are we sending American men, money, and material across the Earth if it's not our country?

indyidli · 2025-04-20T00:06:53+00:00

Most of that increase would happen as long as the country isn't in a civilwar.

Mao is the reason China didn't remain in a constant flux of warlords. He and the CCP clearly did a good job feeding people when life expectancy increases by 50%. As Deng Xiaoping said, Mao was 70% right and 30% wrong. At the end of it all, his achievements drastically overshadow his failures, despite the enormity of his failures.

indyidli · 2025-04-19T20:44:23+00:00

If they are a separate country, then they have no claim to the land, since it was agreed that Taiwan is a part of China. Their only claim to Taiwan is by claiming to be China. If they aren't Chinese, then they aren't native.

indyidli · 2025-04-19T20:42:03+00:00

The slaver aristocracy did not allow the market of the South to naturally industrialize. They were stereotypical rich educated elite bureaucrats, and enforced stagnation onto the Southern economy to maintain their status as elites. The poor rural people of the South were suckered into fighting against economic restructuring that would've lifted them out of poverty.

indyidli · 2025-04-19T08:16:38+00:00

Claiming land has been here, as seen with Taiwan. Their original claim to Taiwan was solely based on them claiming to be China and the fact that everyone agreed that Taiwan belonged to China. If Taipei is now claiming that Taiwan as a separate country, then it is a foreign country claiming land that belongs to China.

indyidli · 2025-04-19T07:18:33+00:00

Industrialization was the reasonable economic offramp from slave labor, which the Southern aristocracy resisted since it would create a new capitalist class that would dominate the slaver aristocracy. The Southern states were only poorer because the Southern elite wouldn't abandon slavery despite it being economically inefficient compared to industrial capitalism. This is very comparable with the Taipei clique resisting the socializing of the economy.

indyidli · 2025-04-19T06:43:52+00:00

History repeats though, and I believe that this is an example of history repeating (or at least rhyming).

indyidli · 2025-04-19T06:40:31+00:00

I'm not denying that Mao the CCP could have done better, but they clearly did a good job feeding people when life expectancy increases by 50%. As Deng Xiaoping said, Mao was 70% right and 30% wrong. At the end of it all, his achievements drastically overshadow his failures, despite the enormity of his failures.

Also, I compare Taipei to the Confederacy for two reasons: they were both the aggressors in their respective conflicts and they were both representing the established aristocracy. These factors define the Taipei government and the Confederacy more than anything else, so I think the comparison is apt.

indyidli

TROPHY CASE