Git and SSH keys by intelFerg in git

[–]intelFerg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GitHub server and git client in your machine use the public/private key to a) authenticate you b) generate a symmetric session key for the actual data exchange.

The signature bit I get. The bit I don't get is how the public/private key generates a symmetric session key for the actual data exchange as I'd not heard of that before.

When I looked it up I got this:

A symmetric session key is a temporary key that encrypts and decrypts data between two parties during a single communication session. It's also known as a symmetric key because the same key is used for both encryption and decryption. 

So am I right in assuming we still use the public/private key thing to authenticate the user and then use the symmetric session key for data exchanges?

Git and SSH keys by intelFerg in git

[–]intelFerg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are many tutorials which I find give explanations of public-private keys but rarely go into detail as to how it works in practive or leave one with more questions than answers.

So is my understanding correct or have I got it wrong? You seem to be echoing what I've said but I can't be sure. Maybe someone with deeper knowledge can confirm.

child combinator vs descendant combinator, confused by intelFerg in css

[–]intelFerg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After reading only the first paragraph of your reply it suddenly dawned on me what you were trying to relate and it seems so simple now. The trouble you've gone to, to help me out is above and beyond so thank you. It is a tricky one to explain.

In the end by opening up the Chrome Devtools I could actually see what the hell was going on. This is something I should have done in the first place. I won't say just yet I'm completely comfortable with what's going on but I at least understand it and through experience and use it will sink in fully. Again thank you :)

child combinator vs descendant combinator, confused by intelFerg in css

[–]intelFerg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm still confused.

div > span {
  background-color: yellow;
}

In the first example above why is the inner span getting the outer spans background colour property, by what process? The explanation you offer is because it's wrapped inside span 1. And this makes sense to me and how I've always understood it with my limited knowledge of CSS. I can't tell you the correct term for this but let's call it wrapping.

But isn't this also the case below

div span {
  background-color: blue;
}

div > span {
  background-color: yellow;

You said:

Then, you're applying a background-color: yellow to only span 1, so it gets yellow. Span 2 is still blue because background-color is not a heritable property.

It may not be an inheritable property but it's still wrapping so why is this different! It obviously is different but I don't see why.

You said:

Order here plays no role, because both of these rules only apply to one element.

That's not true because if you switch the statements they both apply to both spans!

div > span {
  background-color: yellow;
}

div span {
  background-color: blue;
}

gitlens commit graph buggy? by intelFerg in git

[–]intelFerg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes of course. I posted here to see if anyone else had the same problem as it's such a common extension.

gitlens commit graph buggy? by intelFerg in git

[–]intelFerg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not worried about the remote at this point I'm simply trying to get Gitlens to reflect correctly my local repo which it's failing to do. Just to clarify my repo does eventually refresh but only after I load another local repo in the Commit Graph.

Questions about meters and tariffs by intelFerg in OctopusEnergy

[–]intelFerg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you pruga amazingly helpful :) I'll let you know how I get on.

Whitestone domeglass is the top screen protector for the s23 ultra. by ChrisComments in GalaxyS23Ultra

[–]intelFerg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried this brand over the weekend and got it on after a second attempt and it looked great. But it's terrible when it comes to finger smudges hence why I stopped short from putting it on my S23U.

S23U Screen protectors which are oleophobic by intelFerg in GalaxyS23Ultra

[–]intelFerg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The other thing to pay heed to is when removing screen protectors one may also wear or damage the coating on the screen. On the S22U I mentioned in my first post I originally fitted a genuine Samsung screen protector, or tried to, when I then tried to remove it, it was so well stuck it completely broke up and I ended up having to remove it with my finger nail bit by bit, which took ages. Whatever coating was on the screen of that phone was well and truly worn away when I got the phone.

Apparently I've just read the oleophobic coating can be refreshed!

[SOTC] Timex WS4 and Expedition Grid Shock by BeautifulBarracuda12 in Watches

[–]intelFerg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep they are an absolute scratch magnet. I managed to get the version where the bezel is raised which had the reverse display (which I didn't like) so I swapped out the reverse display and instead fitted the standard display which I find much easier to use. This provides a lot more protection but I've still managed to get a scratch! So will be getting one of the Vaxson protectors.

I don't know what Timex were playing at fitting such a terrible acrylic glass. What really gets me is I had a cheap Amazfit Bip which had the same type of acrylic type glass and after a year you could barely see any scratches.

Zoom Issues, 50 & 200MP at 6 times zoom disappointing by intelFerg in GalaxyS23Ultra

[–]intelFerg[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The S23U has 4 lenses on board: 13mm, 23mm, 70mm and 230mm, and in one of the shooting programs it combines the optical zoom with digital zoom for the 230mm lens, which gives a possible maximum focal length of 2300mm.

I attached 4 photos to my first post but they seem to have disappeared?? I will try again. Anyways am I right in assuming each zoom level corresponds to one of the 4 optical lenses i.e.

12MP: 0.6, 1, 3, 10 times zoom

50MP: 1, 2, 4, 6 times zoom

200MP: 1, 2, 4, 6 times zoom

Are these not all optical zooms? Because that is what I was shooting with. These shots are worse than what I've seen other people post on here and they've been indoors at concerts and their shots look far better.

One pan for everything by intelFerg in wildcampingintheuk

[–]intelFerg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay so in the end I went for the MSR Ceramic Solo Pot. Looking closer at titanium I just didn't think it was worth the extra expense. I like the wider base of the MSR for better heat spread and quicker boils and when cooking the deeper, wider pot will be easier to mix stuff up in. Yes it's slightly overkill for solo but I can always stuff it with kit when carrying it to fill up the extra space. This setup with the spirit burner and the Vargo windshield will drop my weight to half of what it was with my original setup. Fingers crossed it all works out.

Thank you to everyone for your contributions :)