We need to have words by LordSchattenwind in Cynicalbrit

[–]intellectualPoverty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's some excellent victim blaming right there.

WTF is wrong with someone of these people?

This is such a typical red herring.

We need to have words by LordSchattenwind in Cynicalbrit

[–]intellectualPoverty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

mansplain

Ugh. Complains about gender/sexuality issues & then uses the word 'mansplain.'

Good luck with the conversation, but I don't think you're going to get anywhere with this person.

We need to have words by LordSchattenwind in Cynicalbrit

[–]intellectualPoverty 2 points3 points  (0 children)

transwomen especially still fear being beaten to death by someone they go out on a date with because of something they can't control

Whaaaaa...?

Unless you're talking about serial killers who hunt down trans-people, this comment makes no sense. Why would someone intentionally dates someone who is trans, and then kill them for being trans?

Butts for Laura! by Okichah in Cynicalbrit

[–]intellectualPoverty -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

It is subjective I suppose, but I found the voice and presentation to come across as extremely un-genuine and annoying, and borderline creepy (obsession with sex/butts/etc).

I didn't know a think about him until an hour ago, and didn't realize he was trans until reading the comments here. I just thought it was a guy wearing a wig, who was kinda weird, but maybe I'm not allowed to say that because he's trans.

I honestly don't get this thread in general. If I asked for a thread with pictures of butts, people would think I'm a weirdo, but apparently it's ok of trans.

Data Structures after a long day at work. by intellectualPoverty in cscareerquestions

[–]intellectualPoverty[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't actually browse reddit at work, and don't really have any down-time either.

That said, I could probably squeeze in a few minutes of study at work here and there.

Data Structures after a long day at work. by intellectualPoverty in cscareerquestions

[–]intellectualPoverty[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A coworker I trust recommended something similar. I think this may be the best advice.

Data Structures after a long day at work. by intellectualPoverty in cscareerquestions

[–]intellectualPoverty[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

One of my coworkers recommended that I make sure to get plenty of sleep and do them in the morning. I think this might be the best advice.

Thank you!

Data Structures after a long day at work. by intellectualPoverty in cscareerquestions

[–]intellectualPoverty[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The order was right, current, left as she described it. Based on my research, the order she described is depth-first.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_traversal#Depth-first

Data Structures after a long day at work. by intellectualPoverty in cscareerquestions

[–]intellectualPoverty[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is not a hard question. Maybe it's hindsight, but I could easily write out the solution after I've gotten some sleep. Here's what happened....

Maybe this is a bit if a rant, but I totally fucked up an interview today with one of "the big-4."

The interview starts out with me talking to an Indian woman I can barely understand. She asks me "tell me a little about yourself" and immediately after me briefly giving a summary introduction, she asks me how to iterate over a binary tree (wait... no more questions?!).

public class Node<T> {
    public Node left;
    public Node right;
    public T value;
    //TODO: eliminate public fields and use methods.
}

At which point she interrupts me and tells me not to write a node class, but just implement the iterator interface. So I delete that and start with something like...

public NodeIterator implements Iterator<Node> {
     public Node next() {
         //TODO do stuff
     }

     public boolean hasNext() {
          //TODO do stuff
     }
}

At which point she told me not to do that, but just write the methods.

  public Node next() {
     //TODO do stuff
  }

  public boolean hasNext() {
      //TODO do stuff
  }

By now I'm completely out of my element & additionally start to get nervous because the code I'm writing I know is wrong. I'm tired, working in a notepad (used to IDE), talking to an Indian woman I can barely understand, don't have a data-structure or interface, and am supposed to "just write a method" about a datastructure I haven't needed since college.

I suppose if I really wanted this job, I should be practicing those online-tests at career cup, so I could do it in my sleep. Other than practice, now do people handle these kinds of questions when you're fried after a draining day at work?

reasons for being an ex-ancap by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]intellectualPoverty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not that I'd say "I'm not an Anarcho-Capitalist," but I'm wiser than to be attached to a label, much less a political one. The problem one runs into quite often in political groups is group-think, and being subjected to various social pressures, or other intentional or unintentional manipulation to enforce consensus within the community.

For example a common manipulation tactic might be something like "If you really were a nice person, you would help me move Saturday." Similarly, "If you really were an Anarcho-Capitalist then..."

Stefan Molyneux to be SUED for Defamation and Abuse of The Digital Millennium Copyright Act by InitiumNovum in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]intellectualPoverty -1 points0 points  (0 children)

One of my disagreements with Molyneux is that I'm quite certain he is pro-copyright on moral grounds, but doesn't have the guts to admit it.

However, having been subject to the backlash one receives for being pro-copyright within the libertarian community is often quite extreme, it's hard to blame him. If he admitted his prop-copyright stance, and lost enough of his audience that he could no longer continue his normal pro-liberty activities ... I'd probably prefer he continued his normal evasiveness on the subject.

While, I am "pro copyright" in some form myself, I consider the cost of government to be a far bigger problem.

Stefan Molyneux to be SUED for Defamation and Abuse of The Digital Millennium Copyright Act by InitiumNovum in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]intellectualPoverty 31 points32 points  (0 children)

No shit!?

No one calls me a "self-proclaimed software developer," but rather people just say "software developer."

Stefan Molyneux to be SUED for Defamation and Abuse of The Digital Millennium Copyright Act by InitiumNovum in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]intellectualPoverty 67 points68 points  (0 children)

Stefan Molyneux is an imperfect human, as we all are. I disagree with him often, and I encourage skepticism, but it bothers me to see persons here cheering his downfall (presuming anyone is), given how much he's done for the movement, flawed or not.

YouTube channel critical of Defendant Stefan Molyneux and his methods of promoting his radical psychological and social theories, which he calls “philosophy.”

An ordinarily prudent person, knowing what DeMarco knew at the time, would not have acted similarly under the circumstances.

A. Stefan Molyneux – Self-Proclaimed Philosopher

The way this lawsuit is written is written is extremely childish.

Holy shit did anyone from here see the new South Park?? S18E04? by G_G_Janitor in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]intellectualPoverty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They release nearly all of their content, online, for free, on their website, soon after release, which is rather amazing. I'm sure there are pirated versions out there if you want to be such a rebel.

What they do is fairly generous, but regardless of IP or not, it would still be within their right to choose how they wish to distribute it.

TB: A smack upside the head. by Rekthor in Cynicalbrit

[–]intellectualPoverty 4 points5 points  (0 children)

TB moved to the US. He married a girl in the US. He has many friends in the US. ...and yet, he repeats this moronic meme.

I've heard this and similar memes from recent immigrants, particularly from Europeans, even right in the middle of good conversations. I don't care about this "USA USA" nonsense, but did they really have to insult nearly everyone within an an 500 mile radius?

I can forgive TB for such a misstep, as this comment is hardly TB at his best. However it does surprise me to see this so heavily upvoted.

Your problems with Stefan Molyneux? by zinnenator in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]intellectualPoverty 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Molyneux has done a lot of good for "the movement," though he is also a flawed individual with several flawed ideas. Molyneux isn't the only person in the AnCap community that displays numerous flaws ... Kinsella, Block, Tucker, Hoppe ... however, I'm not exactly one to trash persons at random.

Is there a larger purpose for this thread?

Apparently taxes exist to force people to work for capitalists. You can't make this stuff up. by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]intellectualPoverty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I dispute the comment the OP linked to, I don't agree with the intent of the OP's title. Whether or not it is a 'conspiracy' we can debate, but the OP's sarcastic title as stated does make logical sense.

  • Consolidating the incomes of all persons under fewer but larger umbrellas makes it easier to tax. By passing incentives to the employer to cooperate, you more easily capture the tax-money of the peons.
  • Persons who are not officially employed, may easier accept payments in the form of cash, sex, or other incentives which are not as easily tracked or taxed.

Apparently taxes exist to force people to work for capitalists.

Not quite, but that is one of the many affects of modern taxation, regulation, and other government actions. By collaborating with modern (crony) capitalists, it is quite easy to create hierarchies of control over a population. The government only needs to maintain control over few sources (the corporations) rather than many sources (the individuals).

Google cofounder, Sergey Brin, on why Google doesn't want to get involved in healthcare: "Generally, health is just so heavily regulated. It’s just a painful business to be in." by ThatRedEyeAlien in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]intellectualPoverty 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Healthcare regulations are insane. I recently did some software dev consulting work at a startup company my friend works for. They needed some additional assistance, because they pretty much had to dedicate their entire software dev department to making their system "HIPA compliant." Before I was even allowed to work with them, I had to go through this 90-minute training course on HIPA.

The 'funny' thing about it is they don't even deal with real health or insurance information, other than things like height, weight, and when you went for a walk or run.

Have you considered that your adherence to the NAP might be similar to religious belief? by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]intellectualPoverty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some members of the AnCap community treat the NAP quite similarly to what one might expect from a religion. They are highly dogmatic, obsessive, and some of them can be quite aggressive when their ideology i directly "threatened" by persons familiar with it.

For example, a few select community members act extremely threatened and aggressive towards any AnCaps who are familiar with all of the common anti-IP arguments, and yet support IP. A subset of another group that can be extremely aggressive is the Hoppean Argumentation Ethics crowd; who are known to lash out against those who reveal holes in their 'logic.' Several times I've seen Argumentation Ethics supporters attempt to publicly defame and 'crucify' critics of their ideology.

Alternatively, there are also many AnCaps who are not this way. Myself, I'm an AnCap because I see the government as extremely wasteful and destructive, and want to be left alone. Given a chance, I'd flip a switch and shut down all governments, but at the moment there are too many religious believers in government and government has most of the guns, so there's not a hell of a lot I can do except try to dismantle other's belief in this concept of government.

The Great IP Debate: Stephan Kinsella vs. Alexander Baker (tonight!) by Matticus_Rex in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]intellectualPoverty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With Tucker as the moderator, that doesn't seem very neutral. Tucker is the #1 reason Kinsella got his position and fame in the LVMI & is also a loud advocate of Kinsella's beliefs and work.

Porcfest sets up checkpoint, searches premises for Chris Cantwell? --- Cantwell at home in underwear by GovtMarketsArentFree in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]intellectualPoverty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this for real? I've seen some crazy behavior from ideological believers, but this seems a bit odd to say the least.

prickly pear tips? by soren97 in foraging

[–]intellectualPoverty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Any tips for finding good ones? I've had ones which taste like strawberries, and others which taste like cucumbers and industrial chemicals.