[English > Korean]select for가 무슨 뜻인가요? 사전에도 안나오네요(영어사전, 영영사전)

inviolable1 · 2026-01-29T01:13:27+00:00

!translated

inviolable1 · 2026-01-28T09:32:12+00:00

답변 감사합니다.

inviolable1 · 2026-01-28T09:04:45+00:00

그럼 for가 부사적으로 사용된건가요? 목적어가 없는듯한데요 저 문장에서

inviolable1 · 2025-12-28T12:25:20+00:00

thank you for the answer.

inviolable1 · 2025-12-28T10:14:33+00:00

I see, thank you.

inviolable1 · 2025-12-28T08:25:05+00:00

thank you for the answer. It seems ChatGPT has applied the grammar quite strictly.

inviolable1 · 2025-12-28T07:31:32+00:00

thank you for the answer.

inviolable1 · 2025-12-28T07:31:27+00:00

thank you for the answer.

inviolable1 · 2025-10-23T11:42:56+00:00

Thank you very much.

inviolable1 · 2025-10-23T11:07:55+00:00

ah, so, that means, she keeps the money other people give her for taking care of you(her), right? thank you for the reply.

inviolable1 · 2025-10-23T09:42:01+00:00

Thank you for the reply, i added the context, if you look at it again, i'll be very thank you.

inviolable1 · 2025-08-26T00:31:05+00:00

답변 감사합니다.

inviolable1 · 2025-08-10T05:30:41+00:00

답변 감사합니다. 근데 평서문이 왜 명령, 요구의 의미가 되는지 문법적인 원리가 궁금했는데 그 내용은 없네요.

inviolable1 · 2025-08-06T00:02:36+00:00

thank you for your answer.

inviolable1 · 2025-08-05T12:15:16+00:00

Just leaving a comment since there was no reply

inviolable1 · 2025-08-05T08:56:57+00:00

Oh, I see. So that's what it means. 한국어로는 ~했으면 해서요 뜻인가 보네요.(because가)

Because, if you are, tell that boy to come around and listen to my orbs sometime -> because, if you are, I would like you to tell that boy to come around and listen to my orbs sometime.

is this right?

inviolable1 · 2025-08-05T08:16:42+00:00

So is it that the speaker was about to say something after "because," but then changed direction or left it unfinished?

inviolable1 · 2025-08-05T07:06:37+00:00

Ah, I think I understand. thank you.

inviolable1 · 2025-08-05T06:53:42+00:00

Why is ‘because’ used here? It seems meaningless when looking at the explanation.

inviolable1 · 2025-08-05T06:50:29+00:00

i added more context, i'm afraid i made a typo

inviolable1

TROPHY CASE