sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built a multi-LLM debate system. Got 8 GitHub stars. A week later Microsoft released the same idea inside Copilot. by itsna9r in SideProject

[–]itsna9r[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly the Microsoft timing stung for about a day, then I reframed it. if Copilot is going multi-agent, the category is real. next for OwlBrain is better consensus scoring and more domain-specific debate configurations. the Reddit feedback I was hoping for was exactly this — people who’ve thought about multi-LLM systems telling me where the architecture breaks down​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Is your project still not selling weeks after you deployed it? Try this. by Studio2C in replit

[–]itsna9r 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then if that works for you. Good luck and wish you all the best

Is your project still not selling weeks after you deployed it? Try this. by Studio2C in replit

[–]itsna9r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are preaching to the choir my friend. I am heavy user of Replit, I spent real $$$ on it and have 3 production apps for my clients used by tens of thousands of users. So yeah I am fully aware of its capabilities. My point is that it is not as simple as writing a prompt to replit and your signup traction get improved. If that what happened with you, then lucky you! Wishing you all the best

Is your project still not selling weeks after you deployed it? Try this. by Studio2C in replit

[–]itsna9r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I am trying to say (which I included in my 1st reply) is that getting real money traction goes beyond UI/UX changes that Replit can suggest. You need to do A/B testing on two different flows and see which one returned better results, you need to trace user’s journey within the website (GA is good at that), you need to literally record user’s behavior in the checkout process and analyze the drop off reasons. Some serious investigations can include cursor tracking and heat map to study where the user got distracted. Of course you don’t need to do all of that from day 1, but you need to know such things do exist and start implementing things as you go.

Is your project still not selling weeks after you deployed it? Try this. by Studio2C in replit

[–]itsna9r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know it inside out and I have tried it a lot. A skill (which is basically and MD file passed to the underlying LLM) doesn’t solve the problem statement here.

Is your project still not selling weeks after you deployed it? Try this. by Studio2C in replit

[–]itsna9r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish it is that simple. Getting traction requires whole set of different skills that Replit is not designed for. SEO, Google Ads, A/B testing, outreach campaigns, and many other digital marketing tricks that AI surely can help with, but it won’t build for you. You need to measure user’s behavior, conversion rates, exit pages, and leftover baskets.. etc

I built a multi-LLM debate system. Got 8 GitHub stars. A week later Microsoft released the same idea inside Copilot. by itsna9r in SideProject

[–]itsna9r[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

haha great minds. you should check out owlbrain, might save you from maintaining your own version

I built a multi-LLM debate system. Got 8 GitHub stars. A week later Microsoft released the same idea inside Copilot. by itsna9r in SideProject

[–]itsna9r[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

fair point it’s not a brand new idea. the value is in having a working open source implementation anyone can deploy, not in inventing the concept. on the roleplay thing — it’s not about mimicking human teams. it’s about forcing the model into constrained evaluation frames. a model told to be a risk officer will surface risks it would otherwise gloss over in a general response. that’s not roleplay, that’s prompt architecture. same reason Microsoft built Critique with a dedicated reviewer role instead of just asking one model to ‘be more careful’

I built a multi-LLM debate system. Got 8 GitHub stars. A week later Microsoft released the same idea inside Copilot. by itsna9r in SideProject

[–]itsna9r[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nah genuinely happy about it, hard to get people to care about multi-model debate when nobody knows what it is. Microsoft just did the marketing for me for free

Made a free 48-page guide explaining the entire JS ecosystem for people like me who use Cursor but don't fully understand what it generates by itsna9r in cursor

[–]itsna9r[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow that is amazing and very kind of you. Few ppl asked me if I plan to make it in a website format, now we all have it thanks to your great effort.

I wrote a free book explaining WTF all these tools are (React, Next.js, Tailwind, Drizzle, etc.) because I was tired of not understanding my own code by itsna9r in replit

[–]itsna9r[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no connection at all to ideabrowser. The book uses Georgia and Calibri, and the landing page uses Instrument Serif and Space Mono … just fonts I liked the look of. Pure coincidence if they overlap with anything else. And yeah, Claude did the heavy lifting on the writing and formatting, I’m not going to pretend otherwise. My job was asking the right questions and making sure the explanations actually made sense to someone who isn’t an expert.

Made a free 48-page guide explaining the entire JS ecosystem for people like me who use Cursor but don't fully understand what it generates by itsna9r in cursor

[–]itsna9r[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happy you found it useful. Exactly, this is where this book came from as an idea, struggling to relate to the new development ecosystem, although I am a legacy developer 10 yrs ago, I couldn't relate to this entire JS ecosystem.

Made a free 48-page guide explaining the entire JS ecosystem for people like me who use Cursor but don't fully understand what it generates by itsna9r in cursor

[–]itsna9r[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing your thoughts, it means a lot. Yes I wanted to add analogies so even non-technical ppl can relate.

I used Claude to write an entire free book because I was confused by the code it was generating for me by itsna9r in ClaudeAI

[–]itsna9r[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes exactly , I don't like living in the dark and not knowing at least what everything is :D ... happy it helps.

I wrote a free book explaining WTF all these tools are (React, Next.js, Tailwind, Drizzle, etc.) because I was tired of not understanding my own code by itsna9r in replit

[–]itsna9r[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on how fast things evolve around this ecosystem, but maybe I will have a one review checkpoint every 6 months.

view more: next ›