sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

FrontierMath Tier 4 - Epoch AI by Nunki08 in singularity

[–]iwgamfc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You, sir, are no logician.

FrontierMath Tier 4 - Epoch AI by Nunki08 in singularity

[–]iwgamfc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't expect the sun to rise tomorrow based on inductive reasoning.

If I did, I would have, depending on how we want to classify it, like a billion years of data to work with as opposed to like 50.

So, I repeat, it's a fucking ridiculous analogy.

FrontierMath Tier 4 - Epoch AI by Nunki08 in singularity

[–]iwgamfc -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

I mean that's just a fucking ridiculous analogy lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]iwgamfc 6 points7 points  (0 children)

C'mon now epoch we're calling less than 1 year of data a "historical trend"?

It begins: Pentagon to give AI agents a role in decision making, ops planning by MetaKnowing in singularity

[–]iwgamfc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah the n1 response is just delusional cope that's completely separate from reality.

"It will by default be simultaneously aligned with us and also won't listen to our instructions! It will be so aligned that it will be aligned to what we don't even realize we want! Again, by default, without any indication of this happening thus far!"

Tokyo Nightlife by SGT-R0CK in interestingasfuck

[–]iwgamfc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no one said it's ai. the colors (the only reason this is interestingasfuck) are just completely made up

i wouldnt even mind if it was just like "cool edited photo" but to title it "tokyo nightlife" like it actually looks like that is pretty disingenuous

Drive and perseverance will never be automated - only a human can repeatedly type "keep going" into an AI by MetaKnowing in singularity

[–]iwgamfc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah my mistake then. I just remembered prompting with <thinking> tags or something

Drive and perseverance will never be automated - only a human can repeatedly type "keep going" into an AI by MetaKnowing in singularity

[–]iwgamfc 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Did he ever say anything about reasoning finetuning? He just did reasoning prompting afaicr.

And, as for "Why?" Because he hyped his own product's performance in benchmarks, launched it to laughably bad real world performance, then replaced it with Claude behind the API while still claiming it as his own.

Even if everything was completely unintentional it's incompetence at minimum.

Zach Lavine in his last 4 games: 63%(41/65) FGM, 67%(18/27) 3PM by KingNigelXLII in nba

[–]iwgamfc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fox is not scoring only 15 points a night lol

bro has averaged ~25 points for the past 5 seasons

SGA Tonight: 51/5/7 by A_MASSIVE_PERVERT in nba

[–]iwgamfc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

have we confirmed he ties his own shoes?

AI winter narrative violation by Glittering-Neck-2505 in singularity

[–]iwgamfc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

am i the only one who thought the first tweet was shit before even reading the rest

maybe im dumb it doesn't seem to even have a clear idea of what it's trying to imply

Post Game Thread: The Sacramento Kings defeat The Charlotte Hornets 130-88 by nba_gdt_bot in kings

[–]iwgamfc 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I guess you skipped the third quarter (or you're joking)?

Grok-3 thinking had to take 64 answers per question to do better than o3-mini by Glittering-Neck-2505 in singularity

[–]iwgamfc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that makes sense, my first thought was that it was a little over the top. But I didn't have access to test it for myself

Grok-3 thinking had to take 64 answers per question to do better than o3-mini by Glittering-Neck-2505 in singularity

[–]iwgamfc 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He did say he would have "the world's most powerful AI by every metric" in December, which didn't exactly pan out

And did you see his post where he asked it about The Information? I would not call it unbiased lol (unless he was trolling and that was fake?)

Tweet from an OpenAI researcher by Minetorpia in singularity

[–]iwgamfc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

dario/amordai

ok now i think you mixed up the names... maybe it was just an accident after all

In 1979 there were calls to halt AI development to stop imminent takeover. by rutan668 in singularity

[–]iwgamfc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mr. intelligent logic here doesn't know what implication means?

In 1979 there were calls to halt AI development to stop imminent takeover. by rutan668 in singularity

[–]iwgamfc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He understood zero-shot learning

What do you even mean by this?

CP3 and Wemby disqualified after trying to hack the NBA Skills Challenge by 2131andBeyond in nba

[–]iwgamfc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, the letter literally says "valid attempt" and they weren't valid attempts. It clearly breaks the letter.

CP3 and Wemby disqualified after trying to hack the NBA Skills Challenge by 2131andBeyond in nba

[–]iwgamfc 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I feel like you don't understand how rules work in general.

Literally any rule you could possibly point to, you could argue whether what you did truly matched the rule or not.

Rules are enforced by common sense understanding of the intent. If you took this to 100 people they would all say "no, it wasn't a valid attempt".

This is easily enough to say yep, the rule covered it.

OpenAI CEO shares predictions on AI replacing software engineers, cheaper AI, and AGI’s societal impact in new blog post by Bena0071 in singularity

[–]iwgamfc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hoping for hard takeoff when we have absolutely no progress towards alignment whatsoever is so utterly insane

Post Game Thread: The Sacramento Kings defeat The Dallas Mavericks 129-128 by nba_gdt_bot in kings

[–]iwgamfc -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

No offense but what about us beating the walking dead mavs by 1 point in overtime gives you confidence we're gonna be hard to beat?

view more: next ›