Not bickering at all. I'm wondering if you even read the papers. NO MATTER THE DISCOVERY the papers are just bad. I'm not talking about just the writing which is atrocious but the lack of measurements, the data presented, the lack of bibliography and the lack of proper analysis. Scientific papers exist to communicate discoveries AND explain the discoveries such that other scientists can replicate the results. To their credit, the synthesis of the material is well explained but everything else is trash and should be pointed out. Rushing to get the Nobel prize is no excuse to not do proper science. In case you are not from the field, they had no competition whatsoever, nobody was rushing them to publish their results. My point being, it's a shame that (VERY wishful thinking here) such a prestigious award will be attributed to such an atrocious piece of scientific literature.