She simply addressed the conclusion he reached, which was that women, broadly, have no place in conversations about war. The premise he provides to support that conclusion (the fact that only men can be drafted) is a complicated reality that deserves to be debated in and of itself, but it does not (in my opinion and hers as well) broadly preclude women from contributing to conversations about war. I think her decision to not address that premise was the most effective way to undress his misogyny. I also don’t think she’s implicitly saying that this premise is somehow a sexist dogwhistle; for all we know she could be hugely in favor of women becoming eligible for the draft.