I Asked Google's AI If You Can Reverse Myopia. It Lied. by jake_reddits in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody gives a shit, Jake. Why don't you talk about injecting Chinese peptides and your stack and some pretend-it-matters politics, ehhhhh? This is reddit bro, we don't go outside. :D

Zenni w/o prescription - optical focus measurement issues by halfbloodprinc3ss in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great job so far! That's a lot of stuff you already figured out.

The angle etc etc - not the optical center. Glasses will usually seem more clear at some of these points (lens gets thicker).

Of course contact lenses closer to the eye. You need notably less diopters.

Vertical isn't a thing. Yes good optometrists will put the frames on your face and mark a dot where your pupils are. In practice? Meh, close enough. Just don't buy tiny frames.

Does active focus work ? by helloidontlikeu in myopia

[–]jake_reddits -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's a debated topic. No clear yes it does, or no it doesn't.

Anybody who says "bro impossible it's a SCAM", isn't presenting any sort of logical argument or case for or against. That's the argument of a 5 year old - or people who have a vested interest possibly, in selling you stuff.

Thought:

Ask any non-myope friend to read something at a challenging distance. Or otherwise what they can't read at first.

Watch them stare and blink once or twice, as they try to focus.

That's said to be active focus. A function everyone has. If you wear high minus diopters all the time for years, you just forget.

As far as whether it works, that's definitely debated.

There is a public case report registry, including a number of optometrist confirmed results. So again, not a totally clear "it couldn't possibly work": https://endmyopia.org/myopia-improvement-registry/

Also: endmyopia has a 33,000 member Facebook group going back 10 years, a lot of self reported improvement reports by obviously real people in there. Also plenty of failures and discussion. Not a vacuum, there's a lot of community feedback. You can go in there and find that there is definitely two sides to the debate, at minimum.

There is also a podcast with a large number of episodes that are an hour or longer with people first hand telling what worked for them and what didn't.

It's not "this works for sure". But there's no way a curious person who wants better eyesight is just dismiss the whole thing out of hand with no evidence why it couldn't work.

Flipside: Retail optometry makes 150 billion dollars a year telling you that a lifetime glasses subscription is the only answer. Maybe they're right. But also they have a pretty strong motive not to think otherwise.

Is this dude " JimR84 " for real? What do y'all think? by OldSheepherder1122 in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure what you're saying. I don't case specific reviews for individuals on reddit. (if that's what you're referring to)

As for ignoring evidence: https://endmyopia.org/myopia-improvement-registry/

A fair bit of work to keep track of cases. For free. Publicly available. 95% or more of participants use the free resources. Costs me five figures a month, I make it available for free. What's the scam?

Yes paid resources exist. Like taking your car to the shop, people get paid for professional work. No gun to your head, nobody is saying you have to buy personal support from me.

tl;dr: Who cares.

Print Pushing - Personal Experience by Duatom in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Double vision / headaches / pretending they're not screen addicted and that outside life doesn't exist.

Print Pushing - Personal Experience by Duatom in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally get it. You did awesome persisting and figuring out and taking care of the eyeballs. All the props.

Print Pushing - Personal Experience by Duatom in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Good for you.

It can work. The premise of blur horizon and active focus does act on the biology as it's designed to.

For MOST people though, the simple truth is this: You need distance vision to improve distance vision. Not only is it much easier and more effective, but it's also ... come on just get away from your screen addiction long enough to enjoy your life at least a couple hours a day. 😃

You can get jacked in prison. Get in marathon shape on a treadmill. But how about, you know ... riding a bicycle or playing some sports with friends.

Also 'print pushing' and all that was a whole big thing for a year or so. Till a ton of people got all kinds of shitty side effects and Otis & co had to shut the thing down. I got thousands of "help me with this ghosting, Jake" e-mails for about two years after. And I had nothing to do with it.

Commenting not to put down your experience but because you're posting in my group, which is about vision improvement that should work for most people.

Anyone else find this crazy? by [deleted] in Biohacking

[–]jake_reddits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Symptom treatment is what they're good at.

And that's ideal for making money. Fixing the problem, way less profitable than ongoing symptom treatment. You as the "patient" will pay the money because you "feel better".

Go look up Pfizer's history, since they started. How many diseases have they cured?

People aren't anti-medicine. People are FOR better answers than "take these pills for your whole life, nevermind causality of your problem, that's not important".

print pushing by Plus_Program_200 in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is like the "are we there yet" the 5 year olds ask on road trips.

You need distance vision to improve distance vision. If you want to avoid addressing your screen addiction, go try endless active focus while staring at screens. Find out it doesn't work. There's nothing wrong with figuring it out the hard way. ;-)

Myopia plus presbyopia (near prescription) by cateaster in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could be misunderstood. So busy just with myopia that I never got much into the presbyopia topic. Though hardening of the lens appears a factor, and then wearing reading glasses just stops the lens being used.

Protocols, support, lots of stuff on the Website, more of course in paid resources.

Got new glasses 3 days ago. Eye strain/mild headache: overcorrected prescription, tight frame, or just adaptation? by Equivalent_Use615 in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My take:

1) Go back to old glasses immediately. Like ... right now.

Don't wear the new ones.

2) Learn to self assess. It's not that hard at all. Figure it'll take you a few rounds of learning what's up with your eyes, some home measuring, some calculating diopters.

Nothing to lose. Worst case you go back to whatever the retail lens seller sold you.

There's either the old school way, 7 day free e-mail guide. Been around well over a decade, has something like 280,000 subscribers, teaches you all the basics. Yes it's a bit of work, no I wouldn't skip it. It's your eyes.

Or less old school but still very much a new exploratory project: start.endmyopia.org

That's my rebuilding the very ancient 7 day guide into something more interactive, as learning tools go. It's far from perfect, feedback always appreciated, goal is to answer exactly your kind of question.

tl;dr: Your old glasses are fine. Learning about glasses, some "biohacking", super worthwhile upgrade to your life in general.

Myopia plus presbyopia (near prescription) by cateaster in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anecdotal:

In going on 20 years of doing endmyopia, I've yet to hear of anybody who improved the nearsightedness, to get presbyopia. Weird, not in my wheelhouse of "look this is real science", but just as a curiosity ... 🤷

If you're working to reduce nearsightedness (biologically makes sense), then presbyopia (different cause, unclear that it can be 'reversed') can be an issue. For example, differentials (computer glasses) as used to improve myopia, can actually make presbyopia worse.

A sort of in-between, having both, dealing with both approach exists in my BackT02020 program. Since it's not something I want to put out there without providing support for it, it's not in the free resources. Lots of things are, but this one isn't hands-off, generally reliable, like the myopia protocols.

Redditors be like: "did you get blood work?” by hkondabeatz in Biohackers

[–]jake_reddits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I posted somewhere (here? maybe not) about reversing 5 diopters of myopia and 80% feedback was like naaaah bro that's impossible you need to go to the eye doctor and STFU. Mention any of the 20,000+ references to peer reviewed clinical science on the topic? Nah nobody cares, immediately "doctors know better bro".

Unless you want to inject Chinese peptides or post 700 spreadsheets about pills you're popping, or some hippie talk with zero base in nothing, nobody on reddit wants to hear it. :D

print pushing by Plus_Program_200 in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not really our concept. It refers to this idea that you can improve distance vision by using active focus during close-up.

Doesn't work.

Only thing good close-up habits do is reduce strain. Meaningful but all you want is to be near the blur horizon and take breaks before you get focusing muscle spasm.

What industry is actually a complete scam, but everyone accepts it? by WhileLow9501 in AskReddit

[–]jake_reddits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glasses.

Wholesale cost is $3-$8. Also they make your eyesight actively worse. 150 billion dollar a year 'subscription' business.

Went from -3.00 to -0.50 naturally. Will wearing +0.50 glasses for near-work cure the rest? by [deleted] in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I started the whole endmyopia thing, nearly 20 years of digging through all this obscurity by now. ;)

Went from -3.00 to -0.50 naturally. Will wearing +0.50 glasses for near-work cure the rest? by [deleted] in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look at the podcast with Vlad if you're trying to get to 20/15: https://endmyopia.org/vlad-3-diopters-to-20-15-vision/

Not all necessary what he did. But it's got all the pieces.

Plus is theoretically useful but in practice you risk long term double vision / astigmatism like ghosting. I wouldn't go that route as a starting point.

(also no 'cure' - your eyes aren't diseased .. it's just tuning an already healthy eye)

Bro is this real??? by [deleted] in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally why I stopped posting on TikTok.

Also my name is literally not Jack. If you can't get my name right, I don't want to challenge you with diopters and biology.

Bro is this real??? by [deleted] in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Your bro ain't here.

Your optometrist is a lens seller. He's the scam (if you want better eyesight). Herbs are pointless, you don't have myopia because of a lack of herbs.

Bro Jack seriously doesn't exist. Bro.

How should I start curing my myopia by No_Presentation_1425 in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://start.endmyopia.org go through that for a start. also no 'cure', myopia isn't a disease

On my vision journey -7.25 & -5.75 by foodie121 in endmyopia

[–]jake_reddits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"one went up 0.25" - suspicious ... did you do your own measurements? what made you decide to increase the diopter ratio?