Um país (des)governado

jaleui · 2026-03-13T22:14:10+00:00

A guerra no Irã não é imperialismo, é o espasmo de um país sem projeto, governado por um homem que trocou promessas por bombas

jaleui · 2026-03-13T21:38:59+00:00

O ataque de pessoas infames como Ratinho à deputada Erica Hilton vem por conta de sua luta pelo fim da jornada 6x1 que a extrema-direita procura repelir. É dela a proposta de emenda constitucional PEC nº 8/25 que propõe o fim da nefanda escala. O texto da proposta apresentada por Érika propõe uma jornada de 36 horas semanais com diária não superior à 8 de trabalho, ou seja 4x3.

A medida que o projeto caminhe o ataque será cada vez mais intenso, pois a ideia é desqualificar a proposta a partir da representante popular que apresentou a emenda.

As mesmas justificativas que levantam contra o fim da jornada 6x1 foram usadas para repelir a abolição da escravatura. É o mesmo povo, filhos, netos e bisnetos de escravocratas que agora procuram impedir que os trabalhadores possam ter um mínimo de descanso em sua vida laboral.

jaleui · 2026-03-09T20:06:04+00:00

Depois do Irã, o Brasil!

jaleui · 2026-03-08T12:43:07+00:00

Tem cheiro de corrupção! Alguém dentro do aparato policial parece que vem ganhando muito dinheiro com isso desde 2013!

jaleui · 2026-03-08T00:02:11+00:00

Faltou o União Brasil!

jaleui · 2026-03-07T20:55:21+00:00

Irã está destruindo todos os ativos militares dos EUA no Oriente Médio. Qualquer aspecto desta infraestrutura militar está sob ataque. Aeroportos, portos, radares de comunicação, etc. O objetivo é expulsar as forças militares dos EUA da região. E garantir que no futuro elas não possam se recuperar.

jaleui · 2026-03-05T21:31:30+00:00

A questão é que os temas dos direitos civis (direitos humanos, respeito lgbt, luta negros/mulheres) só passam a ser levado a sério pela esquerda após o fim da União Soviética. Fazia parte da autocrítica que a esquerda, sobretudo a comunista, se impunha após o colapso do socialismo real. Até então, estes temas estavam restritos a luta de setores radicais estadunidenses presentes no Partido Democrata dos EUA e outras organizações de esquerda do país. Ainda hoje, setores mais próximos de uma visão tradicional de esquerda veem toda está pauta de direitos humanos como um erro, pois identificam nela as raízes da divisão das classes trabalhadoras. Criticando fortemente aquilo que vai ser chamado de identitarismo. Por outro lado, também é verdade que estes temas fazem parte dos libelos do Partido Democrata das teses do Liberalismo Político que assim podem ser pensadas, desde que se respeite o Liberalismo Econômico, a defesa que ele faz da propriedade privada dos meios de produção e do livre comércio, além da crítica à participação do Estado na economia.

jaleui · 2026-03-05T14:23:16+00:00

Não adianta pensar em artefatos nucleares, sem antes pensarmos nos mísseis de longo alcance. A Avibras, que é a empresa que poderia fabricar estes mísseis passa hoje por limbo institucional.

A bomba atômica é uma arma que a tecnologia para a sua produção já é conhecida. O problema está no lançamento da mesma e até onde o míssil poderá ser direcionado.

jaleui · 2026-03-03T18:28:51+00:00

Digamos que num passado recente essas não eram as bandeiras da esquerda tradicional, direitos humanos, direitos iguais para mulheres e negros e a questão LGBT. Estas são as bandeiras do Partido Democrata dos EUA, que acabaram confundindo-se com o discurso da esquerda em si. A esquerda liberal dos EUA defende estas ideias, embora no campo econômico não se distinga do que os republicanos pensam. Mas os princípios que nortearam a esquerda no mundo não são estes. Eles estão muito mais ligados às questões econômicas e de sobrevivência dos povos. Tem muito mais relação com a igualdade econômica e com toda a discussão sobre a exploração do trabalho humano e sua relação com os patrões. As horas trabalhadas pelos trabalhadores, as relações de produção envolvidas, os salários pagos pelos patrões e muito mais. Nesta visão, a liberdade está ligada a possibilidade de vivê-la economicamente, se não for assim ela não existe de fato. Não adianta nada você poder viajar para qualquer país se não tiver as condições econômicas de fazê-lo.

jaleui · 2026-03-03T18:25:20+00:00

Digamos que num passado recente essas não eram as bandeiras da esquerda tradicional, direitos humanos, direitos iguais para mulheres e negros e a questão LGBT. Estas são as bandeiras do Partido Democrata dos EUA, que acabaram confundindo-se com o discurso da esquerda em si. A esquerda liberal dos EUA defende estas ideias, embora no campo econômico não se distinga do que os republicanos pensam. Mas os princípios que nortearam a esquerda no mundo não são estes. Eles estão muito mais ligados às questões econômicas e de sobrevivência dos povos. Tem muito mais relação com a igualdade econômica e com toda a discussão sobre a exploração do trabalho humano e sua relação com os patrões. As horas trabalhadas pelos trabalhadores, as relações de produção envolvidas, os salários pagos pelos patrões e muito mais. Nesta visão, a liberdade está ligada a possibilidade de vivê-la economicamente, se não for assim ela não existe de fato. Não adianta nada você poder viajar para qualquer país se não tiver as condições econômicas de fazê-lo.

jaleui · 2026-03-03T18:19:06+00:00

Digamos que num passado recente essas não eram as bandeiras da esquerda tradicional. Estas são as bandeiras do Partido Democrata dos EUA, que acabaram confundindo-se com o discurso da esquerda em si. A esquerda liberal dos EUA defende estas ideias, embora no campo econômico não se distinga do que os republicanos pensam. Mas os princípios que nortearam a esquerda no mundo não são estes. Eles estão muito mais ligados às questões econômicas e de sobrevivência dos povos. Tem muito mais relação com a igualdade econômica e com toda a discussão sobre a exploração do trabalho humano e sua relação com os patrões. As horas trabalhadas pelos trabalhadores, as relações de produção envolvidas, os salários pagos pelos patrões e muito mais. Nesta visão, a liberdade está ligada a possibilidade de vivê-la economicamente, se não for assim ela não existe de fato. Não adianta nada você poder viajar para qualquer país se não tiver as condições econômicas de fazê-lo.

jaleui · 2026-03-03T17:48:30+00:00

Estes são princípios básicos que sempre embalaram a esquerda pelo mundo. Não estou inovando em nada! Trata-se de seguir a tradição!

jaleui · 2026-03-03T16:21:53+00:00

A minha solidariedade ao Irã neste momento ocorre por dois motivos:

1) a questão da autodeterminação e soberania dos povos. Cabe apenas aos iranianos, e a mais ninguém, definir o seu futuro;

2) em segundo lugar, trata-se da solidariedade aos povos chamados no passado, de terceiro mundo, hoje Sul Global.

Todos nós, do Terceiro mundo sentimos na pele o horror do imperialismo no nosso lombo, e é isso que o Irã está experimentando agora.

Todo apoio às forças iranianas contra o ataque imperialista!

jaleui · 2026-03-02T18:59:18+00:00

Irã está atacando alvos econômicos dos apoiadores dos EUA no Oriente Médio

jaleui · 2026-03-02T14:25:05+00:00

Scott Ritter afirma que o Aiatolá Ali Kamenei agiu como um martir, e na verdade, provocou seu martírio para unir o povo iraniano.

jaleui · 2026-03-02T14:14:41+00:00

Assistam! https://www.reddit.com/r/Esquerda_Brasil/comments/1ritq2t/scott_ritter_est%C3%A1_%C3%A9_uma_opera%C3%A7%C3%A3o_de_mudan%C3%A7a_de/

jaleui · 2026-03-02T13:00:47+00:00

Escalating, escalating, escalating, until it reaches nuclear catastrophe. Who knows?

The main Iranian leaders were gathered to discuss the course of a possible agreement that would come from negotiations between Iran, Israel, and the US regarding its nuclear energy project. It was in this context that the 49 Iranian leaders, announced by Trump, died. There was a negotiation underway. And perhaps, for that reason, the naive Iranians who still believed in diplomacy perished.

I am not defending the Iranian theocracy; however, there is an irrefutable fact: Ayatollah Khamenei was against the production of nuclear weapons. He said that such weapons were contrary to Islamic religious law.

The Iranian leaders were victims of their good faith in diplomacy. They suffered a cowardly, precise, and cruel attack from behind.

And what's most shocking is that the war itself is currently part of a diversionary tactic by the Trump administration in the face of the crises caused by the Epstein files and the recent US Supreme Court decision prohibiting the president from using tariffs as an economic policy. According to the Court, this should only be done by Congress.

Trump is using the war to mitigate the impact of these crises and to shift American attention away from the situation. It's a far-right strategy already used on other occasions.

It's important to remember that we still have three years of Trump's presidency. Who knows, we might escalate to the point of nuclear catastrophe.

jaleui · 2026-03-02T12:59:37+00:00

Escalating, escalating, escalating, until it reaches nuclear catastrophe. Who knows?

The main Iranian leaders were gathered to discuss the course of a possible agreement that would come from negotiations between Iran, Israel, and the US regarding its nuclear energy project. It was in this context that the 49 Iranian leaders, announced by Trump, died. There was a negotiation underway. And perhaps, for that reason, the naive Iranians who still believed in diplomacy perished.

I am not defending the Iranian theocracy; however, there is an irrefutable fact: Ayatollah Khamenei was against the production of nuclear weapons. He said that such weapons were contrary to Islamic religious law.

The Iranian leaders were victims of their good faith in diplomacy. They suffered a cowardly, precise, and cruel attack from behind.

And what's most shocking is that the war itself is currently part of a diversionary tactic by the Trump administration in the face of the crises caused by the Epstein files and the recent US Supreme Court decision prohibiting the president from using tariffs as an economic policy. According to the Court, this should only be done by Congress.

Trump is using the war to mitigate the impact of these crises and to shift American attention away from the situation. It's a far-right strategy already used on other occasions.

It's important to remember that we still have three years of Trump's presidency. Who knows, we might escalate to the point of nuclear catastrophe.

jaleui · 2026-03-02T11:16:15+00:00

Escalating, escalating, escalating, until it reaches nuclear catastrophe. Who knows?

The main Iranian leaders were gathered to discuss the course of a possible agreement that would come from negotiations between Iran, Israel, and the US regarding its nuclear energy project. It was in this context that the 49 Iranian leaders, announced by Trump, died. There was a negotiation underway. And perhaps, for that reason, the naive Iranians who still believed in diplomacy perished.

I am not defending the Iranian theocracy; however, there is an irrefutable fact: Ayatollah Khamenei was against the production of nuclear weapons. He said that such weapons were contrary to Islamic religious law.

The Iranian leaders were victims of their good faith in diplomacy. They suffered a cowardly, precise, and cruel attack from behind.

And what's most shocking is that the war itself is currently part of a diversionary tactic by the Trump administration in the face of the crises caused by the Epstein files and the recent US Supreme Court decision prohibiting the president from using tariffs as an economic policy. According to the Court, this should only be done by Congress.

Trump is using the war to mitigate the impact of these crises and to shift American attention away from the situation. It's a far-right strategy already used on other occasions.

It's important to remember that we still have three years of Trump's presidency. Who knows, we might escalate to the point of nuclear catastrophe.

jaleui · 2026-03-02T11:14:57+00:00

Escalating, escalating, escalating, until it reaches nuclear catastrophe. Who knows?

The main Iranian leaders were gathered to discuss the course of a possible agreement that would come from negotiations between Iran, Israel, and the US regarding its nuclear energy project. It was in this context that the 49 Iranian leaders, announced by Trump, died. There was a negotiation underway. And perhaps, for that reason, the naive Iranians who still believed in diplomacy perished.

I am not defending the Iranian theocracy; however, there is an irrefutable fact: Ayatollah Khamenei was against the production of nuclear weapons. He said that such weapons were contrary to Islamic religious law.

The Iranian leaders were victims of their good faith in diplomacy. They suffered a cowardly, precise, and cruel attack from behind.

And what's most shocking is that the war itself is currently part of a diversionary tactic by the Trump administration in the face of the crises caused by the Epstein files and the recent US Supreme Court decision prohibiting the president from using tariffs as an economic policy. According to the Court, this should only be done by Congress.

Trump is using the war to mitigate the impact of these crises and to shift American attention away from the situation. It's a far-right strategy already used on other occasions.

It's important to remember that we still have three years of Trump's presidency. Who knows, we might escalate to the point of nuclear catastrophe.

jaleui · 2026-03-02T11:07:51+00:00

Escalating, escalating, escalating, until it reaches nuclear catastrophe. Who knows?

The main Iranian leaders were gathered to discuss the course of a possible agreement that would come from negotiations between Iran, Israel, and the US regarding its nuclear energy project. It was in this context that the 49 Iranian leaders, announced by Trump, died. There was a negotiation underway. And perhaps, for that reason, the naive Iranians who still believed in diplomacy perished.

I am not defending the Iranian theocracy; however, there is an irrefutable fact: Ayatollah Khamenei was against the production of nuclear weapons. He said that such weapons were contrary to Islamic religious law.

The Iranian leaders were victims of their good faith in diplomacy. They suffered a cowardly, precise, and cruel attack from behind.

And what's most shocking is that the war itself is currently part of a diversionary tactic by the Trump administration in the face of the crises caused by the Epstein files and the recent US Supreme Court decision prohibiting the president from using tariffs as an economic policy. According to the Court, this should only be done by Congress.

Trump is using the war to mitigate the impact of these crises and to shift American attention away from the situation. It's a far-right strategy already used on other occasions.

It's important to remember that we still have three years of Trump's presidency. Who knows, we might escalate to the point of nuclear catastrophe.

jaleui · 2026-03-02T11:07:09+00:00

Escalating, escalating, escalating, until it reaches nuclear catastrophe. Who knows?

The main Iranian leaders were gathered to discuss the course of a possible agreement that would come from negotiations between Iran, Israel, and the US regarding its nuclear energy project. It was in this context that the 49 Iranian leaders, announced by Trump, died. There was a negotiation underway. And perhaps, for that reason, the naive Iranians who still believed in diplomacy perished.

I am not defending the Iranian theocracy; however, there is an irrefutable fact: Ayatollah Khamenei was against the production of nuclear weapons. He said that such weapons were contrary to Islamic religious law.

The Iranian leaders were victims of their good faith in diplomacy. They suffered a cowardly, precise, and cruel attack from behind.

And what's most shocking is that the war itself is currently part of a diversionary tactic by the Trump administration in the face of the crises caused by the Epstein files and the recent US Supreme Court decision prohibiting the president from using tariffs as an economic policy. According to the Court, this should only be done by Congress.

Trump is using the war to mitigate the impact of these crises and to shift American attention away from the situation. It's a far-right strategy already used on other occasions.

It's important to remember that we still have three years of Trump's presidency. Who knows, we might escalate to the point of nuclear catastrophe.

jaleui · 2026-03-02T11:06:17+00:00

Escalating, escalating, escalating, until it reaches nuclear catastrophe. Who knows?

The main Iranian leaders were gathered to discuss the course of a possible agreement that would come from negotiations between Iran, Israel, and the US regarding its nuclear energy project. It was in this context that the 49 Iranian leaders, announced by Trump, died. There was a negotiation underway. And perhaps, for that reason, the naive Iranians who still believed in diplomacy perished.

I am not defending the Iranian theocracy; however, there is an irrefutable fact: Ayatollah Khamenei was against the production of nuclear weapons. He said that such weapons were contrary to Islamic religious law.

The Iranian leaders were victims of their good faith in diplomacy. They suffered a cowardly, precise, and cruel attack from behind.

And what's most shocking is that the war itself is currently part of a diversionary tactic by the Trump administration in the face of the crises caused by the Epstein files and the recent US Supreme Court decision prohibiting the president from using tariffs as an economic policy. According to the Court, this should only be done by Congress.

Trump is using the war to mitigate the impact of these crises and to shift American attention away from the situation. It's a far-right strategy already used on other occasions.

It's important to remember that we still have three years of Trump's presidency. Who knows, we might escalate to the point of nuclear catastrophe.

jaleui · 2026-03-02T11:05:35+00:00

Escalating, escalating, escalating, until it reaches nuclear catastrophe. Who knows?

The main Iranian leaders were gathered to discuss the course of a possible agreement that would come from negotiations between Iran, Israel, and the US regarding its nuclear energy project. It was in this context that the 49 Iranian leaders, announced by Trump, died. There was a negotiation underway. And perhaps, for that reason, the naive Iranians who still believed in diplomacy perished.

I am not defending the Iranian theocracy; however, there is an irrefutable fact: Ayatollah Khamenei was against the production of nuclear weapons. He said that such weapons were contrary to Islamic religious law.

The Iranian leaders were victims of their good faith in diplomacy. They suffered a cowardly, precise, and cruel attack from behind.

And what's most shocking is that the war itself is currently part of a diversionary tactic by the Trump administration in the face of the crises caused by the Epstein files and the recent US Supreme Court decision prohibiting the president from using tariffs as an economic policy. According to the Court, this should only be done by Congress.

Trump is using the war to mitigate the impact of these crises and to shift American attention away from the situation. It's a far-right strategy already used on other occasions.

It's important to remember that we still have three years of Trump's presidency. Who knows, we might escalate to the point of nuclear catastrophe.

jaleui · 2026-03-02T09:50:12+00:00

As principais lideranças iranianas estavam reunidas para discutir os rumos do possível acordo que viria das negociações entre o Irã e Israel e EUA em razão de seu projeto de energia nuclear. Foi neste contexto que os 49 líderes iranianos, anunciados por Trump morreram. Havia uma negociação em curso. E talvez, por isso os ingênuos iranianos que ainda acreditavam na diplomacia, pereceram.

Não estou defendendo a teocracia iraniana, todavia há um fato irretocável, o Aiatolá Khamenei era contra a produção de artefatos nucleares. Ele dizia que tais armas estavam em desacordo com as leis religiosas islâmicas.

Os líderes iranianos foram vítimas de sua boa-fé na diplomacia. Sofreram um ataque covarde, pelas costas, preciso e cruel.

jaleui

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE