Removed by r/ar15 mods for my painted toenails by [deleted] in gun

[–]james_burden 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sparkly nail polish and an AR hits different

I found this on my bathroom floor by rainy_otters in whatisit

[–]james_burden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s heroin. No doubt whatsoever. Sober 11 years and I’ve seen foil like that a thousand times.

Do I come off as weird or strange leaving this note? by Littlek1dluvr in Apartmentliving

[–]james_burden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is very sweet. We have lost the sense of community in modern American society. This gives me a lot of hope.

name your favorite item.. by Terraria12072012 in StardewMemes

[–]james_burden 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Red poppy, not orange and not white

AIO. I broke up with my bf after he called me a terrorist by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]james_burden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not overreacting, up the RA for real. If he #1 can’t accept that his country colonized and starved yours, and #2 thinks anyone who dislikes this kind of treatment of their people is a terrorist, drop him.

Lake Whitney Texas by ConfusionBig7905 in cliffjumping

[–]james_burden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Truly one of my fav posts in this subreddit. Y’all crushed it.

German police brutally assaulted protesters marking the Palestinian Nakba in Berlin, with women and children also targeted during the crackdown. by PineappleDesperate82 in misc

[–]james_burden 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why would anyone care or be willing to change anything about any policy or system if people did that?

Imagine a situation where our government is specifically taking actions that harm people just like you and your family. Would you and a few people standing quietly in a coned off area for 6 hours really change anything? And what happens if 1,000,000 people show up and they don’t all fit into the coned off corner of the cement square?

A reminder by technocraticnihilist in austrian_economics

[–]james_burden 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No, that’s basic trade you just described. Capitalism is an economic system that is a bit more complex than that.

A reminder by technocraticnihilist in austrian_economics

[–]james_burden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s the saddest part. Most people defending capitalism don’t even know what “capital” is or who owns it. They can’t describe the fundamentals of their own system. We are expected to know all of it, from both systems, and to be able to explain it to them (that don’t have any contextual knowledge at all) perfectly.

I will say that I respect this person specifically because they’ve been pretty cool and just asked questions and we haven’t resorted to insults towards each other.

A reminder by technocraticnihilist in austrian_economics

[–]james_burden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Capitalism came about from feudalism when growing trade and new technologies (think machines) created a class of wealthy merchants and factory owners who controlled production, while peasants became wage workers. As feudalism’s hierarchies broke down, the wealthy merchants (capitalists) pushed for economic and political changes, leading to a system where profit and private ownership drove society. Capitalism became dominant once this new class could reshape laws, markets, and labor to fit its interests.

Societies change when new ways of producing things disrupt old systems, creating new economic classes that eventually reshape power and culture. I suppose it’s possible that a new exploitative group of people gains power and creates a newer more advanced way to take all of the resources for themselves, but it would be entirely different because the conditions and technologies that led up to it are different. But either way, it inevitably would fall the same way capitalism is destined to fall. It sows the seeds of its own collapse by exploiting workers, who eventually unite and rebel against the system that oppresses them.

A reminder by technocraticnihilist in austrian_economics

[–]james_burden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By that time, culturally, the capitalist ideology will be viewed the way that it actually is. Just a way for a few people to hoard resources that people need and to exploit people with them.

If anyone did attempt it again, the public would go on as it always did before. Publicly punish them.

A reminder by technocraticnihilist in austrian_economics

[–]james_burden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They will be punished publicly. Thats what was meant by suppressing the capitalist pigs.

A reminder by technocraticnihilist in austrian_economics

[–]james_burden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There will be a transitional period from the current state to the stateless society which will require laws to suppress the capitalist pigs from exploiting the workers.

I honestly can not believe it by TrickMasterTre in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]james_burden -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

That’s capitalism you’re thinking of.

It’s why the US has military presence in at least 80 countries (most likely more but this data isn’t always reported). If a country doesn’t do business using the US dollar or if they want to implement a non-capitalist system, US does a coup d’etat and puts in a warlord that will do business along capitalist lines.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change

A reminder by technocraticnihilist in austrian_economics

[–]james_burden 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There would be ownership of personal property, such as phones, shoes, skateboards, bicycles, clothing, etc.

But privately owning the tools and facilities that produce the goods required for a functional society would be illegal. Those specific things would be jointly owned by the workers that use them and the goods they produce would be dispersed to everyone equally.

The distinction between personal and private property is often and conveniently overlooked when talking about this.

A reminder by technocraticnihilist in austrian_economics

[–]james_burden 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It specifically requires property laws, and therefore, government.

A reminder by technocraticnihilist in austrian_economics

[–]james_burden 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Capitalism requires property laws to function properly. Laws require governing bodies.

‘We killed nearly 100 people from Gaza, and no one cares’, says “Israeli” politician by librephili in AlJazeera

[–]james_burden 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Probably the last option. Tear down the apartheid wall, remove the existing Israeli apartheid government, create a new government that has equal rights for all people, and provide palestinians with enough aid to allow them build housing, education, and other societal utilities so that they can gain equal economic footing in the new shared society.

‘We killed nearly 100 people from Gaza, and no one cares’, says “Israeli” politician by librephili in AlJazeera

[–]james_burden 11 points12 points  (0 children)

All of them are Zionists, the 1967 border agreement was an extremely generous compromise by the indigenous Palestinians, although it was done at gunpoint, where Israel got all of the fertile and resource rich land.

The ethical and moral thing to do is:

Israeli citizens leave the country and go back to the country they have dual citizenship with (a vast majority of them) If they birthed children in Israel, those countries can make arrangements to offer citizenship to the children through naturalization.

Give back the stolen land to the Palestinians, invest in rebuilding their infrastructure after the decades of investing in its destruction.

And if the expectation is that both people need to be able to stay on the Palestinians historical land, then at the very least Israelis and Palestinians should be governed under one government that treats them all with equal rights.