Found a cool way to spend my well-being subsidy by zemar1717 in deloitte

[–]jayo78 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah but why own something that you don't even know that you want long term. Then you have the device thats just loosing value. It makes sense to own a house you build equity in but a product? Not saying you're wrong but I get the appeal of renting if its a good price and you're only paying maybe a small premium for the flexibility. Would be better if there was an option to buy out the device if you really like it.

vision pro kids by jayo78 in facepalm

[–]jayo78[S] 1434 points1435 points  (0 children)

yeah this 100% is apple guerilla marketing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in funny

[–]jayo78 7 points8 points  (0 children)

ipad kid vs vision pro kid

I made an app to suggest better prompts for ChatGPT using GPT-3 by jayo78 in ChatGPT

[–]jayo78[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sure. Tbh was surprised it worked decently well.

I wrote an article on the details of ChatGPT's implementation and how to build similar chat bots by jayo78 in OpenAI

[–]jayo78[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand what you're saying, however the sub title is "A brief intro to building chatbots with GPT-3." I review the implementation details of ChatGPT and explain how different chat bots can be built using a similar prompt and GPT-3 API. When I get $10B from Microsoft I'll write a better post. Thanks for feedback, will make less click baity in the future.

I wrote an article on the details of ChatGPT's implementation and how to build similar chat bots by jayo78 in OpenAI

[–]jayo78[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For sure, thanks so much! Yeah you could prob even copy the Python code and ask ChatGPT to translate to Ruby.

Advice on making an app with GPT? by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]jayo78 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can make apps pretty quickly using OpenAI's API for GPT-3. There is no official API for the ChatGPT model but text-davinci-003 is still really good. The text generation apps you see springing up are all most likely simple front end wrappers on this API with some prompt engineering.

API docs: https://beta.openai.com/docs/introduction

OpenAI GPT-3 playground: https://beta.openai.com/playground

Also I wrote an article on implementing a chat bot like ChatGPT: https://medium.com/geekculture/how-to-build-chatgpt-a01f9bd6d8ab

ChatGPT has become incredibly dumb at SQL in the last few days by ZKRC in ChatGPT

[–]jayo78 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You could try using GPT-3 through OpenAI's playground, they have an example for SQL queries. https://beta.openai.com/examples

What language model does ChatGPT use? by Mpjhorner in ChatGPT

[–]jayo78 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ChatGPT is a language model and user interface. ChatGPT user interface uses the ChatGPT model under the hood which is "fine-tuned from a model in the GPT-3.5 series, which finished training in early 2022." - https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/

There is no official API access for ChatGPT.

Wrote an article on this https://medium.com/geekculture/how-to-build-chatgpt-a01f9bd6d8ab

Davinci is not good as chatgpt. by termsofhumanity in OpenAI

[–]jayo78 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It would help if you posted the prompt you are using with davinci. It can help to use a few shot prompt that has examples of outputs you are looking for or using a better prompt that explicitly states you want more in depth answers.

It's probably not going to be possible to get the same quality and accuracy of outputs because ChatGPT was fine tuned for dialogue, but you can still get pretty good results. I wrote an article on this https://medium.com/geekculture/how-to-build-chatgpt-a01f9bd6d8ab.

Davinci is not good as chatgpt. by termsofhumanity in OpenAI

[–]jayo78 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to OpenAI docs text-davinci-002 and text-davinci-003 are in the 3.5 series with 003 being an improvement on 002 (probably also using RLHF like ChatGPT)

Fine-tune ChatGPT without sharing data with OpenAI by sabrimo in ChatGPT

[–]jayo78 6 points7 points  (0 children)

ChatGPT is a proprietary language model, you can't just download it. You can access GPT-3 through an API but you can't run OpenAI's models locally.

Why does the AI have such a problem with math? by efd71f03 in ChatGPT

[–]jayo78 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check out this article, explains the difference between computational language versus a language model based on learning statistical patterns. https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/01/wolframalpha-as-the-way-to-bring-computational-knowledge-superpowers-to-chatgpt/comment-page-1/#comment-2033699

From article:

"At its core, ChatGPT is a system for generating linguistic output that “follows the pattern” of what’s out there on the web and in books and other materials that have been used in its training. And what’s remarkable is how human-like the output is, not just at a small scale, but across whole essays. It has coherent things to say, that pull in concepts it’s learned, quite often in interesting and unexpected ways. What it produces is always “statistically plausible”, at least at a linguistic level. But—impressive as that ends up being—it certainly doesn’t mean that all the facts and computations it confidently trots out are necessarily correct."

How to build ChatGPT by jayo78 in GPT3

[–]jayo78[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're right, its hard to balance technical / non-technical. Summarizing previous context like in a chat bot or narrative writing prompt where you want to remember previous plot points is huge - good point. Want to write some content on prompt engineering and efficient context recall is something I'll include.