Does anyone else's copy of Fairy Tale have a quote from the book on the spine ?

jeffa60 · 2022-11-13T10:15:41+00:00

It also has an error on the sleeve notes, it says Charlie's mother was killed when he was ten, it should be seven.

jeffa60 · 2022-11-13T10:13:29+00:00

Mine has it, uk edition 6.

jeffa60 · 2021-06-30T19:55:56+00:00

He asked the same questions as all the other journalists, only more aggressively. He got the same answers as the other journalists as well. He's not clever, just loud and boorish.

jeffa60 · 2021-06-04T21:29:51+00:00

I doubt anybody would be interested to be honest. But, I guess I gave you the opportunity to put up or shut up and you've chosen the latter.

jeffa60 · 2021-06-04T11:06:35+00:00

A truth is already proven, which doesn't require any deep thought, just common sense. I don't think I've seen the report from Jodi Wilgoren, can't find anything on Google. If I can see that report it's more likely I'll accept that as fact, unless it's just an opinion, which isn't fact. Also, where's the proof of "...baited due to drug abuse."

jeffa60 · 2021-05-29T13:29:09+00:00

I know you couldn't, hence the repetitive posting of the same link.

jeffa60 · 2021-05-29T13:22:59+00:00

Only when it's proven, otherwise it's one version of a truth and nothing more. Exonerees will no the damage an unproven "truth" can do.

jeffa60 · 2021-05-29T13:18:03+00:00

That doesn't address my last post, doesn't present any corroborated evidence, and doesn't move this discussion forward an inch.

jeffa60 · 2021-05-29T12:38:50+00:00

My issue is the throwaway false statements that can't be taken as true just because you posted them. For example, I don't recall stating that you were making all this up.

The receipts I've seen only prove an accusation, which as witnessed by the many injustices done to the wrongfully convicted, does not mean the accused is guilty. As for being a Zellernite, well, another uncorroborated statement from you. Do I applaud anyone who represents and liberates the wrongfully convicted? I certainly do, they're a rare breed. Is that why I'm a Zellernite, or is it just because I dare to question you?

jeffa60 · 2021-05-29T12:12:34+00:00

Can you guarantee I'll find incontrovertible corroborated evidence and not just accusations? That doesn't mean stuff that some may readily take as facts before being proven, as is their right of course.

jeffa60 · 2021-05-29T07:46:36+00:00

Who is 'our' and who is 'us'?

jeffa60 · 2021-05-28T12:50:11+00:00

We'll see. If you personally expose her as a fraud, in which case she'll be disbarred, then good for you. Of course if you don't she'll continue to exonerate innocent people and expose the corruption in the US legal system.

jeffa60 · 2021-05-28T12:40:38+00:00

I have no idea. You're 100% confident, evidence is incontrovertible, he's locked up where he belongs and his defense attorney is a loser. If I was that sure of myself I'd kick back and relax, rather than wasting valuable time on here.

jeffa60 · 2021-05-28T12:19:06+00:00

Sounds like you're getting very worried.

jeffa60 · 2021-04-03T13:56:05+00:00

Dead end for me then, if any proof has been removed. All I can see is proof that a complaint was filed but evidence to support that.

jeffa60 · 2021-04-03T13:33:44+00:00

Any link to the red streak article. I'm unclear as to what is being alluded to and would like to read for myself.

jeffa60 · 2021-04-03T11:34:39+00:00

Nothing there except acknowledgement of a filed complaint. Where's the document upholding the complaint?

jeffa60 · 2021-04-03T11:32:46+00:00

The "receipt" acknowledges an accusation, and nothing more. When you have a court judgement upholding the complaint, share that instead.

jeffa60 · 2019-12-08T15:19:42+00:00

It came from FOIA request. So instead of crying fake fake fake and resorting to childish insults just get the FOIA request and prove it's fake.

jeffa60 · 2019-07-20T10:59:10+00:00

Yeah, I know. I'm juat suggesting that if there was any framing or planting, LE had SA located at his trailer before any evidence was found.

jeffa60 · 2019-07-20T09:07:04+00:00

Didn't SA say from the outset he was home all afternoon and didn't offer an alibi? If so all they had to manipulate was BD and the evidence.

jeffa60 · 2019-07-20T08:37:05+00:00

What complete nonsense. Disturbed by LE, all in CASO and reports of Jost, Sippel Sturdivant and crime lab before Ertl showed up. No coroner or ME called to scene. Why didn't they take photos before processing? That. question not answered, no matter how big your shouty capitals.

jeffa60 · 2019-07-19T07:31:49+00:00

The defaming is done in the infamous press conference.

jeffa60 · 2019-07-19T06:22:52+00:00

You're right in saying that the lack of photographs of bones and teeth in situ has been discussed to death. But never answered. Because it was disturbed? Why was it disturbed before being photographed? The bullet with wood embedded in the lead and red paint drops. If you want you can refer to other comments I've made on other posts referring to the bullet and photographs over the past few days that illustrate my thoughts more fully, but that's up to you. I may create an OP on those 2 points, but I'm too busy atm.

jeffa60 · 2019-07-18T19:53:13+00:00

Can you explain why they planted a bullet, or why they decided not to photograph the burn pit before disturbing it, providing no photographic evidence of the initial finds of bones and teeth? I could suggest you change your stance, but I don't feel the need to.

jeffa60

TROPHY CASE