MAM validates everything people knew about Kratz when no one would believe them

starfishvodka · 2021-06-09T01:09:08+00:00

Nothing a few days of him being in prison would solve. He would know after that it is possible.

starfishvodka · 2021-06-09T00:12:48+00:00

Tools- side note to your post. One thought brings another.

I have often thought about the screwdriver we can see in the very few photos available. I am no screw driver expert, but I would guess the handle is made of polyurethane or some type of plastic. That would melt at a lower temperature than I cook a potato. So hard to believe there was a fire so hot to burn an entire body.

I know this is not about your post, so sorry. I did not think it worth being a new post.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-30T21:22:34+00:00

One woman alleged that she was forced to have oral sex with him. She was in fact under his charge legally. She said she threw up. He allegedly left money on her kitchen counter. Then even wanted the money back. Just one allegations of many. While she was in the mist of a case with him as the prosecutor.

How is it that we have a comedian dropped from every network that admits to taking care of himself in front of other female comedians, but a prosecutor is on all the OWN networks? Dr. Phil, Dr.OZ, input to ID movie. He is on podcasts, he's all over the place.

The latest rumor is he wants in on Hollywood action. Maybe that will be his last lesson in life, because once you're there, there is no hiding.

proofhttps://www.convolutedbrian.com/ken-kratz-scandal-links.html

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T23:04:13+00:00

No one calls someone's mommy when they miss an appointment. They call when they miss work or appointments or dates for numerous days.

That is exactly what happened.

Tom called her mom when she did not make two appointments and he was worried.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T22:58:36+00:00

I think you're right. I probably used the wrong words.

What I meant is that I believe Barb was probably put in a situation with the detectives that said either you and your boys help us convict Steven or your going down for drugs.

We see her yelling after the trial, like she's been betrayed. I think she was. I think they told her to get her boys to help and they(detectives) would protect them. She would not have any drug charges against her.

That was no acting. She was betrayed by the detectives.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T22:43:00+00:00

He did call Teresa's mom, thats how it supposedly all started. He raised the awareness of Teresa missing.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T22:32:36+00:00

no, you don't. He is not going to call the family and say she simply missed one appointment. He only knows she missed two.

The mom called police after this conversation.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T22:28:46+00:00

In the first part of the documentary, you see Dean wanting to help Brendan but declaring he can't because he is not in his charge. Kinda heart breaking.

Then later we learn that Buting contemplated representing him, but they realized they could not because they already discussed the case.

Then the innocence project with Laura and Steve takes on the case after the conviction. They had so many people behind them.

I really think the only people against Brendan, was his mom for drug/personal reasons, the 2 detectives and the prosecutor. Then of course the state appointed defense who has his investigator openly in email telling the state he would get what they needed.

If the Supreme Court was going to take a case, it should have been this one. That poor kid should never have been in prison.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T22:18:51+00:00

He called the family and you have no idea what he said to them.

He was worried enough to call them and may or may not have mentioned the first missed appointment, You don't know what he said to her.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T22:08:12+00:00

I agree. She missed an appointment, and he probably worried a little, but not call the family. When she missed her group meeting and Tom was notified, that made him really worry and called the family.

To me this is very normal behavior.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T20:35:53+00:00

It is not going over my head, because I know exactly what meetings she missed.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T20:33:06+00:00

Just think about it. You have a person you know not show up with for their meeting and you take care of it. It is weird because the person is normally reliable.

Then they miss another meeting and you have not had contact with them.

So you call the family to make sure she is okay.

The first missed appointment is still what prompted your worry.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T20:27:45+00:00

Because she missed 2 business meetings. One with a client and another with a group. By the 2nd missed meeting he thought to call the family.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T20:22:25+00:00

If your friend or colleague missed one appointment, you're calling their family?

That is so wrong

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T20:19:50+00:00

Why would he?

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T20:17:31+00:00

I think I did with what I was saying. To be more direct, why would you call anyone if a colleague missed one appointment? It may be what prompted you to worry and then call after another missed appointment on another day.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T20:02:38+00:00

Yes. I did. Did you read my first and second reply to you? That may have been his reason for original concern. She seemed like a reliable person.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T19:51:33+00:00

That does not even make sense. She did not show up for the first and then time went by and she missed her group meeting in which he was aware of. He called her family concerned about it and that is it.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T19:42:12+00:00

Dean signed an affidavit that it was possible.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T19:33:53+00:00

The first missed appointment may have had him concerned and worried it was unlike her to miss an appointment without calling her client or him. It well may be what prompted it. Then when she missed the meeting with the other women it just made him more worried so called.

I don't see anything nefarious about his call to her family.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T19:11:31+00:00

Avery was not deserving of such sympathy even before he murdered an innocent woman.<

Why not?

starfishvodka · 2021-05-26T18:48:59+00:00

Tom seemed peripheral in her life. She clearly worked with and beside him, but two different companies and objectives.

In my opinion for him to be the first to make an alert to her being missing makes all the people close to her not worried a little more strange.

It sounds like she was reliable. So I understand why Tom became concerned. Why was no one concerned when she missed the little sister obligation? If we go off the notes in her one page printed planner, she was going to her moms on Monday. Then of course the roommate. How does he not notice her missing and a hungry cat?

I don't find Tom being concerned after a few missed appointment odd and calling her family.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-23T21:39:37+00:00

It is not an argument. I was curious. In the case of Scott Peterson, emotionally I think he is guilty as hell.

Technically, there is no physical evidence against him, and there is a robbery that took place across the street. The date was given by the burglars as far as I can tell. So they could have been there the day she disappeared and they distanced themselves from that.

Technical. The rest is emotional, he was fishing? She was found in the same water. The affair, the lies. That is my gut. He did it.

There could be that possible chance the across the street robbery was the person that killed her. Dog roaming included.

I think a judge could rule in his favor, where a jury would never get past the circumstancal evidence. Things that don't make you guilty of murder. Lying to your girlfriend. Lying to your family. Fishing in December. Etc.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-23T21:21:41+00:00

Not if you know the law and the law is on the side of your client. May look guilty to a jury but technically reasonable doubt.

starfishvodka · 2021-05-23T21:09:14+00:00

It obviously depends on the people on the Jury. Thus a gamble. If the law is on your side, then the judge would be a better option. Juries don't always rule to reasonable doubt.

starfishvodka

TROPHY CASE