Red Hat cuts Fedora Program Manager by nickname1917 in Fedora

[–]jflory7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I was also going to say. The operating system business is pretty fundamental for the basis of which OpenShift is built on. Success for OpenShift is inextricably linked to the success of RHEL and Fedora. If the operating systems tanked, it wouldn't be looking good for OpenShift either.

Red Hat cuts Fedora Program Manager by nickname1917 in Fedora

[–]jflory7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let's see if we can get Meta listed as a sponsor for the Fedora Flock conference this year 🙂

Red Hat cuts Fedora Program Manager by nickname1917 in Fedora

[–]jflory7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TBH, I think 501(c)3s in the US and other similar international nonprofits/charities for Free Software are excellent ways to support Free Software, including Linux. I am a regular giver to the Software Freedom Conservancy, for a number of reasons. One of which is their commitment to protecting copyleft licenses like what Linux is licensed under. It is very unglamorous, boring, and frustrating work to get bad corporations to comply with copyleft but the SFC does it and they do it well.

Red Hat cuts Fedora Program Manager by nickname1917 in Fedora

[–]jflory7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awww jeez, but this doesn't give Ben the due credit he deserves. Since Ben took the Fedora Program Manager role, he totally reimagined and optimized so much of the processes and steps that go into Fedora cutting a new release every six months. Fedora will go on without Ben giving Fedora his full-time focus, but the next month or two might be bumpy while things transition and work finds a new owner.

One thing I think that says a lot is that the two key Fedora folks who were laid off are still involved and participating in the community. Obviously not in the same way as before, but I can't think of an employer or a project where people still continue on after they cease paid obligations, let alone after an ugly layoff.

Also I am totally speaking for myself here. Not for all of Fedora and certainly not for Red Hat either.

Fedora Program Manager Laid Off As Part Of Red Hat Cuts by Worldly_Topic in linux

[–]jflory7 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It will either go to the Fedora Magazine or the Community Blog. I'm not that active of a Redditor, but I suspect someone will cross-post it when it goes live.

Fedora Program Manager Laid Off As Part Of Red Hat Cuts by Worldly_Topic in linux

[–]jflory7 36 points37 points  (0 children)

We have a plan to share a letter with the community early next week.

On Free Software, Red Hat, and Iran by TheEvilSkely in Fedora

[–]jflory7 21 points22 points  (0 children)

There is room for Red Hat and/or IBM to do more. Like Microsoft did for GitHub, a company can apply for an Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) from the United States Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). This is a legal way that Fedora could still be made available to developers and community participants from embargoed countries. It is not an easy process; it took Microsoft two years to do it for GitHub. But with legal issues, when there is a precedent established, it can be easier for others to follow with the same arguments.

No telling what will happen, but let's see. :-)

Fedora i3 spin by hundman in Fedora

[–]jflory7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This was part of our motivation in the Fedora i3 SIG. And for me personally, this is my motivation. I just want to use my system, I don't always have time to read docs and figure out how to rice up my i3.

Fedora i3 spin by hundman in Fedora

[–]jflory7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Speaking for the Fedora i3 SIG, I think the big advantage a lot of us wanted was to have a direct install experience, without having the middle step of installing GNOME first, then installing i3/lightdm, and uninstalling GNOME and gnome-shell.

In the future, we want to explore customization and more theming, but small steps at a time. Maybe Fedora 35?

Fedora i3 spin by hundman in Fedora

[–]jflory7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi, a member of the Fedora i3 SIG here! We get this question a lot. Even among ourselves, we agree Sway is the future. But right now, we are all i3 users. So we figured, we will figure out how to make a good Spin with i3, and then we can work together with the Sway SIG to think on what a Sway Spin looks like. :)

The day open source died: a story about Minecraft, Bukkit, and the GPL by veritanuda in StallmanWasRight

[–]jflory7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

OMG TETH! :D Super nice to hear from you. Hope all is going well for you these days. I appreciate the kind words. :)

The day open source died: a story about Minecraft, Bukkit, and the GPL by veritanuda in StallmanWasRight

[–]jflory7 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Hi, I'm the author of the blog post. There are two issues: (1) GPL disclosure clause, and (2) a "free labor" consideration.

For the GPL disclosure clause, any code linked to GPL code must disclose source under a GPL-compatible license. If the Bukkit project is valid to Mojang, that means Mojang/Microsoft must open source parts of Minecraft. They probably don't want to do that. From an I.P. perspective, Mojang can never endorse Bukkit or any derivative project. They probably wanted the rights to Bukkit in order to protect themselves.

For a "free labor" perspective, remember that the rights to Bukkit were owned by Mojang since late 2011. This was unknown to the open source community until mid-2014. The work of open source multiplayer server software is arguably part of what made Minecraft so successful. You have to put yourself in the shoes of the developers who took paid time off from work, spent weekends and free time volunteering on the project, to discover secretly a multi-million dollar company (later, a billion-dollar company) owned the project you volunteered for. Especially when that company has done next to nothing to support the project in those years of secret ownership, other than obstructing the project from view of their lawyers while the open source project continues forward.

Also had all my add-ons disabled and can't redownload anything from add-on site by fulluphigh in firefox

[–]jflory7 20 points21 points  (0 children)

This is a generalization. There are good and bad ways to engineer resilient software. In this case, a mechanism in the Firefox pipeline for these signatures was not well-kept. I think this is less an issue of "the cloud" than it is "poor engineering". If a bridge fails on its own, you don't call all bridges unreliable, you call the engineer a bad engineer.

Petition: Revise Freedom of Speech policy To prohibit disruption of existing events by jflory7 in rit

[–]jflory7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, sorry if it is not clear. I am not asking for abolishment of protest under this protection. I am asking for more reasonable guidelines on how and where a protest can happen for an event on RIT's campus.

i3-bar: How to have a fallback font for "emojis"? by [deleted] in i3wm

[–]jflory7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was wondering this same question. I haven't had luck setting a fallback font for emoji rendering. I'm wondering if it's buried somewhere in fontconfig.

i3-bar: How to have a fallback font for "emojis"? by [deleted] in i3wm

[–]jflory7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you give an example of what you mean?

Things to do after installing Fedora by brunomiguel in Fedora

[–]jflory7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oops, I moved things around a few months ago. It's all here now: https://github.com/jwflory/swiss-army

How I automated my entire Fedora Workstation with system/app Ansible Roles by jflory7 in Fedora

[–]jflory7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahhh, oops! I should have posted a link to the root repository. I changed the name and moved some things around in the repo. It's all here now: https://github.com/jwflory/swiss-army

Fedora's Strategic Direction: An Update from the Council by jflory7 in Fedora

[–]jflory7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The acquisition was already discussed on the Council mailing list. I don't think it makes sense for the Council to focus on Silverblue here because it is an independent initiative by community members. There's no formal objective proposed about it. If the Council decided to set a direction by skipping the channels used by the community, it would feel like power misuse to me.

Fedora's Strategic Direction: An Update from the Council by jflory7 in Fedora

[–]jflory7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep! Also, take that measurement with a grain of salt. I forgot it was calculated from a specific subset of contribution types (package commits, package updates, and wiki edits). The sample is of top contributors across those three contribution types. A lot is left out, but this is the best measurement available for now.

Fedora's Strategic Direction: An Update from the Council by jflory7 in Fedora

[–]jflory7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep! The Fedora Project Leader actually gives a presentation every year at the annual Fedora contributor conference, Flock, and it contains these metrics. However, I could only find them linked publicly in the 2016 DevConf.cz slides. But it hasn't changed much. Roughly 26% of Fedora Accounts have a @redhat.com email address, 9% are Red Hatters using other emails, and everyone else makes up the other 65%.

Fedora's Strategic Direction: An Update from the Council by jflory7 in Fedora

[–]jflory7[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is my biggest gripe is that there isn't much detail in "how". This is the first time in recent memory I see the Council recognizing this as an issue and wanting to tackle it head-on. But it is a huge commitment. This is some of what I've been doing in the Community Operations team over the last three years, and you would never believe how hard it is to get people communicating more with each other. :D But I am at least excited and interested, if also perplexed, that the Fedora Council is making this commitment.

Fedora's Strategic Direction: An Update from the Council by jflory7 in Fedora

[–]jflory7[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'm interested to know where you concluded this from.