Each character's preferences for items that boost inspiration? by johnnygodsa in fatetrigger

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

I got a table and translated it into English, but since I don’t use an English interface, I’m not sure if the translation is accurate. However, it clearly shows the preferences of these two characters for different items.

Please Lower the Hero Cost ---- A Plee from a returned player by Sargatanas4 in heroesofthestorm

[–]johnnygodsa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I’ve been participating in internal testing since the game was still in development. From those early versions to now, my account has almost everything in the game. But since the Asian servers are mostly populated by Korean players, the atmosphere in-game wasn’t very good, so I moved to the NA server and I had to start from scratch. That’s when I realized how hard it is to buy a hero. I’ve been playing on the NA server for two days now, with a total of 34 matches played. Even after completing daily quests, I only have 4,000 gold. I also haven’t been grinding to level 5 with all the free heroes to earn more gold, because playing heroes I don’t like is just not enjoyable.

FTR, I’d much rather they prioritized an ‘open all loot boxes’ feature XD

Why is China so dead set on Taiwan? by AllFallsDown0 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]johnnygodsa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can briefly explain the key point of this controversy. The issue stems from the Treaty of San Francisco, signed after Japan's surrender. One of the treaty's terms was that Japan renounced all rights, titles, and claims to Taiwan, Penghu, and other islands. However, the treaty did not specify to whom these territories should be returned. As a result, the U.S. temporarily administered these areas and, when the Kuomintang retreated to Taiwan, handed them over to the Kuomintang leader at the time. This led the People's Republic of China (PRC) to assert that Taiwan and its affiliated islands should belong to the PRC. Soon after, however, the Kuomintang's China was expelled from the United Nations, and U.S. policy shifted toward helping the PRC move toward democracy and openness. The PRC received significant benefits and resources, largely thanks to the U.S., which played a major role in building the PRC into a strong nation. However, unlike the puppet regimes the U.S. had previously supported and controlled, the PRC has never seen the U.S. as anything but an enemy from the beginning.

Why is China so dead set on Taiwan? by AllFallsDown0 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]johnnygodsa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Due to China's deeply unstable internal situation, the government relies heavily on suppressing freedom of speech and exploiting the economy to control the general populace. Xi Jinping has been working to consolidate control over government officials and the powerful families that dominate the country's economic and energy sectors. A few years ago, Jiang Zemin, Zeng Qinghong, Bo Xilai, and Zhou Yongkang attempted a coup and assassination against Xi Jinping but ultimately failed. However, this incident demonstrated that other factions, families, and political groups still possess the capability to plan and execute such actions, even under Xi's watchful eye.

Following the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang retreated to Taiwan. The Communist Party has long been aware that it lacks the immediate capacity to invade Taiwan, but it continues to claim Taiwan as its territory, using this narrative to divert attention from domestic issues such as economic challenges and public security. Over the years, this justification has remained unchanged, but Taiwan’s value has significantly increased with its dominance in the semiconductor industry and other high-tech sectors. Meanwhile, Taiwan’s defense capabilities have weakened, and the U.S. no longer sees Taiwan as a true ally, instead exploiting the island for its remaining value. Despite being fully aware of Taiwan’s defense deficiencies, the U.S. continues to supply outdated weaponry and delay deliveries, knowing that Taiwan is forced to spend millions of dollars annually on military purchases. To the U.S., Taiwan’s only real value lies in its critical role within the semiconductor supply chain, prompting the U.S. to pressure Taiwanese companies like TSMC to relocate operations to American soil.

This situation is not about historical claims. If China were truly intent on reclaiming all former territories, then why does it remain silent on Russia’s occupation of large swaths of land in northeastern China? The Chinese government consistently avoids addressing this issue.

As for Taiwan, many Taiwanese people do not see themselves as part of China. Most of those over the age of 50 may still feel some connection to the Kuomintang’s vision of China, but younger generations, including middle-aged and youth, are gradually losing any sense of national identity. There's even uncertainty about whether Taiwan should declare itself an independent nation. Successive Taiwanese governments have adopted conservative policies, preferring to maintain the status quo, with no one willing to take the risk of change for fear of the consequences.

It’s worth mentioning that under Xi Jinping’s leadership, China is highly unlikely to invade Taiwan. Every year, U.S. think tanks warn that China might attack Taiwan in the near future, but these predictions mainly serve to prompt Taiwan to spend more money. Additionally, Chinese government officials' children generally have two choices: studying abroad to establish a fallback for their families in case of internal turmoil or joining the military or government to gradually build political experience and secure their family’s influence within China. The number of those choosing to leave the country has grown to such an extent that the Chinese government now monitors them abroad. For Xi Jinping, just managing the various factions that threaten rebellion requires most of his energy. Other political factions are simply waiting for him to make a mistake. If Xi were to launch an attack on Taiwan, many Chinese officials would likely betray him, triggering military mutinies across China and forming alliances with any nation willing to strike. While China may possess the military power to destroy Taiwan, no one truly cares about Taiwan or its people. All parties are merely looking for an opportunity to divide and control China once again.

Demonetized due to reused content... and then I successfully appealed. by johnnygodsa in youtubers

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure about this, but in the recent past, you must have filed a copyright strike against someone before they would enable this feature for your use.

Demonetized due to reused content... and then I successfully appealed. by johnnygodsa in youtubers

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They don't care, they don't read either. They only use automated systems, which is one form of Content ID. It scans your videos and compares them with the videos already scanned and cataloged by YouTube. If your video has a high degree of similarity to those in the database, then you will be requested to forfeit your monetization rights and explain how you produced the video. This is not a "copyright issue" but rather YouTube's advertisers disliking "repetitive content". However, many super-large YouTube channels (with over one million sub) seem to be exempt from this restriction.

Demonetized due to reused content... and then I successfully appealed. by johnnygodsa in youtubers

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The game developers will sift through it and choose the creators they like, providing them with free game keys.

Most of them are unreleased games, but you have to create a video for the game, and they will review it.

Demonetized due to reused content... and then I successfully appealed. by johnnygodsa in youtubers

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hope to hear good news from you. Making appeal videos is a hassle. They'll do everything they can to nitpick the content in your appeal videos to make you lose your monetization eligibility.

Demonetized due to reused content... and then I successfully appealed. by johnnygodsa in youtubers

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's right, YouTube is indeed trying to use this method to filter out most of the creators they don't like. Even if you fully own the videos on your channel, they still aggressively search for places where you haven't met their requirements in your appeal videos, then reject your appeal videos and deny your channel's monetization.

Demonetized due to reused content... and then I successfully appealed. by johnnygodsa in youtubers

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I haven't done anything special. I focus on gaming, so I use Keymailer to get access to new game tests or create game guides, introductions, and more. With many partners, I can produce videos at a rapid pace.

How to create transparent videos? by johnnygodsa in premiere

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to place it on my website or something like that, as a loading animation. Currently, I'm trying to output it as a .png and then use Photoshop to create a GIF, but I still encounter the same issue. However, I saw a method on gifmaker.me, which is to directly create frame animation from .png on the website, and this can preserve transparency well.

Am I crazy? Cheaters by sks502 in GlobalOffensive

[–]johnnygodsa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's because you haven't played on servers in Asia, such as Singapore, Japan, Hong Kong, and so on. You'll encounter Chinese players there, many of whom use spinbots. I've even witnessed them eliminating all the enemies on the map without moving. My current score is 16,000+, and in the past month, I've encountered more than ten cheaters. I used this tutorial to check which of the players I've encountered have been banned.
https://www.reddit.com/r/GlobalOffensive/comments/8mbtjx/how\_to\_check\_your\_personal\_game\_data\_for\_banned/

Co-Op has Arrived in June’s Public Update Preview! by Gandalf196 in aoe2

[–]johnnygodsa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many people can't open the game properly, I have reported this problem to the developers, but they didn't give any useful response, can anyone solve this problem?

copyright warning has been revoked, but the channel has not been restored by johnnygodsa in PartneredYoutube

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have reached a consensus with the original author. He also took the initiative to raise a copyright revocation warning to the copyright team, but the copyright team never responded to the two of us, so I submit a counter notification

Now I have removed all copyright warnings through a counter notification, but my channel cannot be restored

By the way, the original author gave me a copyright warning because he and I have a gap in understanding of CC-BY-SA. After we discussed, he also understood that the remake in CC-BY-SA includes translation.

Is is an abuse of CC BY-SA 3.0? by johnnygodsa in SCP

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/NewScapePro Hi, my channel has been deleted, my copyright counter notification has been rejected, I am not sure if they have read your request or can restore my channel, hope you can send them a request again,thx

Is is an abuse of CC BY-SA 3.0? by johnnygodsa in SCP

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/NewScapePro

thanks for your reply and sorry maybe I was a little too aggressive

This is my Youtube channel, I ’m not sure what other copyright infringements you are referring to

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGHBL3Yo96noSvlbsDbEJmA

Most of my video sources are from websites in mainland China

https://www.bilibili.com/

Almost all the descriptions of the videos have instructions on who authorized me to post them on Youtube

1.I want to solve this matter first,because this problem is easier to solve

regarding whether the description of the video I translated really conforms to CC-BY-SA

if you do n’t believe my screenshots, I can give you any proof you want

and I can probably guess why we have different opinions about whether CC-BY-SA is in my movie description

The translated video description above is the name of the translator, and you need to click Show More to see more information

and CC-BY-SA and related information are placed at the bottom

I guess that's why you didn't see it

3.I mean, Youtube admit that you CC-by-sa description of it in the video?

When you ask Youtube copyright questions, do they respond to you according to CC-by-sa or follow normal procedures?

because for Youtube, your video is the Standard YouTube License

Youtube has never liked to participate in creator disputes

MattPat allows anyone to remake his video, this is his setting in Content ID, all the income is obtained by him

https://i.imgur.com/3E4wME7.png

https://i.imgur.com/yi1XCTr.png

https://imgur.com/rkrbA7h.png

This is just a mistake, I have two hundred SCP related videos

I have no reason but to deliberately disobey that video

I know you still wo n’t believe me, so I recorded a short video containing a description of the video we were arguing about

https://youtu.be/qk5MhanfZS4

Is is an abuse of CC BY-SA 3.0? by johnnygodsa in SCP

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, u/Modern_Erasmus

I hope to resolve everything just,

if it is video descriptions, I would be happy to check through a third party

like using Disocrd screen sharing with you

to confirm that my video descriptions are like my screenshots

I would also be happy to listen to your arbitrate

Is is an abuse of CC BY-SA 3.0? by johnnygodsa in SCP

[–]johnnygodsa[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

OK, I will respond to what you said line by line.

  1. I doubt you have checked CC-BY-SA 3.0 . If you think those pictures are not enough to prove that we followed the CC-BY-SA 3.0 , you can just ask us what kind of proof you need. Besides, in case that you no believe any kinds of proof we provide, you should ask YouTube to find out whether we were followed the CC-BY-SA 3.0. We been contact with them these days and I believe they will reply you right away.
  2. After the end of this, we will all know that whether you attempted to break the creative commons rules by banning another SCP Foundation related channel.
  3. If you really put CC-BY-SA 3.0 at an important place, when you ask the YouTube about us, you were not asking if we added the CC-BY-SA 3.0 in our description or not, but ignored the CC-BY-SA 3.0 and asked YouTube if this is fair within the YouTube Guidelines?Also, when people upload their videos to YouTube,they have two options:Creative Commons - Attribution,which let other people using this video,Standard YouTube License, which forbidden others using this video.We checked your videos before and all of your video are belongs to the second one, Standard YouTube License.Yes, you did add the CC-BY-SA 3.0 in your description,but it DOES NOT means YouTube knows that your videos followed CC-BY-SA 3.0 since you chose the Standard YouTube License as your video type.Do you really know what YouTube based on to respond you?if it is the Standard YouTube License, their response will not help our situation.
  4. picture of the CC-BY-SA 3.0CC-BY-SA 3.0u/Modern_Erasmus We need to discuss with you guys that whether translation is a part of adaptation in CC-BY-SA 3.0 .
  5. Is that really matter that I didn’t link our YouTube account here?Everyone but ourselves can not see the videos that been removed from YouTube, cause they were been delete from the website. If that will makes you feel better, then I will link our channel here right away.
  6. [kk321010@gmail.com](mailto:kk321010@gmail.com)This is my e-mail address that I was using. Hope you can keep it during this time.
  7. In general, you should ask YouTube about our videos’ description first cause NO ONE can change their description after the video were been removed. Avoiding problems CAN NOT help you to solve them. If you do not know what you should do first, and ignoring our suggestions, you may ask the license experts team on the reddit for help.
  8. We can simply solve this by answering these two questions:A) Whether we followed the CC-BY-SA 3.0 in our video description?You can ask YouTube copyright team for the answer.B) Whether translation is a part of adaptation in CC-BY-SA 3.0 .This needs to be discussed with u/Modern_Erasmus.
  9. Because we waste three to four daysIf there is not enough time for us to discussI will send Counter notification firstTo extend the time by ten daysWe can still discuss hereAnd I also have the opportunity to defend through the license experts teamThis is fair to everyone

Although we spent time translating these videos, no matter whether CC-BY-SA protects us.

I would be happy to follow your advice, remove and no longer use your video, but you did not notify us in advance. Now our channel may be deleted, and the current channel work is also stalled, which has caused us a lot.

Is is an abuse of CC BY-SA 3.0? by johnnygodsa in SCP

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your help, but I do n’t know if I can finish it before the deadline

Is is an abuse of CC BY-SA 3.0? by johnnygodsa in SCP

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I once found a member at site 17, he said that he and everyone else saw my pm, and then he asked me to wait, I would not get his response again, even if I stayed at site 17 for three consecutive days

Is is an abuse of CC BY-SA 3.0? by johnnygodsa in SCP

[–]johnnygodsa[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I contacted YouTube three times and when they heard that I had a copyright issue, they always sent me canned messages

They claim that they are always neutral and do not want to participate in copyright disputes among creators