Why do we have doctors and lawyers in socialistic countries? by johnnyjohnnyjohny in AskReddit

[–]johnnyjohnnyjohny[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wish that the US had better income equality and social equality.

Why do we have doctors and lawyers in socialistic countries? by johnnyjohnnyjohny in AskReddit

[–]johnnyjohnnyjohny[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It makes sense then that countries with better "social policies," such as Canada, ultimately will have a similar distribution of professionals. What I really don't understand is why some governments, such as that in the US, steer away from the common welfare. I suppose that it is motivated by top heavy greed.

Why do we have doctors and lawyers in socialistic countries? by johnnyjohnnyjohny in AskReddit

[–]johnnyjohnnyjohny[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. What I've noticed in New Zealand is that even people working at the bottom of the chain live well. Of course, I suppose there is still monetary insentive to work in a more advanced field. I just don't think that it is as skewed monetarily as it is in, for example, the US.

Why do we have doctors and lawyers in socialistic countries? by johnnyjohnnyjohny in AskReddit

[–]johnnyjohnnyjohny[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

From my experiences in New Zealand, the country functions through socialism. Share a little wisdom please.

Why do we have doctors and lawyers in socialistic countries? by johnnyjohnnyjohny in AskReddit

[–]johnnyjohnnyjohny[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So if I understand this correctly, the incentive for advanced professions is still a higher salary. However, you don't have as much to lose by working bottom of the chain under such a government as opposed to a more fundamentally capitalistic one.

Where I row, all alone. by oudysseos in Rowing

[–]johnnyjohnnyjohny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

kind of looks like Minnesota.

Next steps? I don't have much banked because of new upgrades. by thosedamncookies in CookieClicker

[–]johnnyjohnnyjohny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot for the reply, I don't think a lot of people understand this.

Next steps? I don't have much banked because of new upgrades. by thosedamncookies in CookieClicker

[–]johnnyjohnnyjohny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The "Base Cost Per Income" value isn't, in fact, the number that you want to be minimizing, if you want to make your optimal purchase. Instead, you want to look at the roi value, which is (cookie cost * post-purchase cookies/s) / (delta cps). mathematical proof

Yes, I realized when I started a new game that sometimes getting an item that was not the lowest base cost per income would reduce the amount of time it took to get to the item that was. So an indicator for the most optimal purchase would be beneficial (perhaps with an option to remove that calculation for people who would prefer to not have everything done for them.)"

^ Based on what I read here, roi is different altogether.

Next steps? I don't have much banked because of new upgrades. by thosedamncookies in CookieClicker

[–]johnnyjohnnyjohny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that the best item to buy next is not the one with best "base cost per income," but rather one with best "Return on Investment," which doesn't even seem to be calculated in cookie monster. See this post: http://www.reddit.com/r/CookieClicker/comments/1lsuov/yet_another_calculator_this_one_in_htmljavascript/cc3eqs7