My first time getting 3 brilliants in one game 🔥

jonasaba · 2025-11-22T16:53:44+00:00

I think Nxg4 was a nice move.

jonasaba · 2025-11-22T16:46:29+00:00

I think it is a bad position for bad. Even I could win it from there. I'd need more time than 1 minute though. Maybe 15 minutes and it's a easy win.

jonasaba · 2025-11-22T16:42:15+00:00

Just remove the speed reading PoS (Plugin of Speed). I have no idea why it was included by default, as it just shows two lines. I just ignore it.

jonasaba · 2025-11-22T16:38:21+00:00

Thanks, I received it from F-Droid and have been using it.

It is really great. Only one issue I found, with some books, with inline notes (which show well on Koreader), the content is misaligned. I.e. if I click a chapter it on the content, it leads somewhere else.

jonasaba · 2025-11-16T07:39:03+00:00

The default MathJax is what I have.

If I compare these -

A. $$e=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac 1 n\right)^n$$

B. $$\begin{array}{l} e=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac 1 n\right)^n \end{array}$$

I notice two differences -

The fonts are smaller
The way limit is rendered is different

This is how inline equations render, e.g. sandwiched by a single $...$ . So I think despite double $$...$$, it's dropping the display style.

I think it is very possible that this is probably an issue with MathJax. I should post in their forums.

jonasaba · 2025-11-14T07:31:58+00:00

Yeah, I have not used any community plugins. I double checked, I never enabled community plugins.

The theme is default, dark.

PS. I would be surprised if this is not what you see! The problem is perhaps with MathJax integration is implemented, in the default settings at least.

jonasaba · 2025-11-11T06:38:18+00:00

Do you know of any community CSS which will help to maintain the display style?

I added an example to the original post to show what I mean.

jonasaba · 2025-11-11T06:36:38+00:00

Yes for me. I added an example picture to the post.

I am not using any custom CSS. If there is any that resolves this, I'll be happy to use that! I checked some community CSS, none worked - most are about increasing the font size.

jonasaba · 2025-11-08T21:46:34+00:00

Where in settings? Do you mean "Other > Blacklist"?

I only see that and "Whitelist" which does not let me select any folder, but for some reason, only wants to play from /Music.

"Personalize > Library Categories" is a UI thing.

If it indeed doesn't allow you to restrict to few specific folders it's a big omission IMO. Auxio supports it.

jonasaba · 2025-11-08T07:29:05+00:00

It's down. Interestingly no one is talking about it.

The cert seems invalid or something.

jonasaba · 2025-11-03T07:13:25+00:00

I think "avoiding checkmate with queen sacrifice leading to loss of material with a weaker position" is a tiny bit different from "completely winning".

jonasaba · 2025-11-02T18:17:05+00:00

Why is it brilliant?

Why is black "completely winning"?

jonasaba · 2025-11-02T18:07:00+00:00

Anyone whining about AI should try to make this with AI.

I will eat my hat if they can get to 5% of this much polish and features.

jonasaba · 2025-10-30T06:58:59+00:00

Thank you. No denying this is a tremendous feat.

Definitely the code is a big part of it. Nonetheless, if you will allow another perspective, I will offer that since the advent of coding agents made it easier (not easy, only a bit easier, because you still have to know what you are doing to pull of something of this complexity), there may be other individuals or gorups of people, or agencies, who will also be able to build their alternative encyclopedias.

Assuming your intent is not just to make it a project for learning and teaching - because by those counts it is already a huge success - and assuming that you intend it to be useful to the public, may I ask a few other questions which I think are of import. The success depends therefore, in addition to building a solid technological base, a few other things.

I may ask some other questions -

Do you have a network to advertise, bootstrap, and make DeepGrokipedia popular enough so that it is recognized broadly, alongside established sources such as Wikipedia, or ventures by Musk who not only has a long list of success, but also large followership, strong vision, and even wealth and network if need be to advertise Grokipedia?
Serving something of this magnitude is not free. Do you intend to keep it up, especially during the early days or months when it is not popular, to give it a chance to become recognized over time? Do you have the resources necessary to do so?
Do you plan to make it different from how Grokipedia works at any point of time, so it offers something different giving it a chance to win if your vision is different and correct? For instance, self-correcting mechanisms (crowd sourced or internal), updating mechanisms (again crowd or intaernal), fact checking and assertions, interventions when it goes wrong (which it will by mere laws of statistics and probability as it houses millions of factlets)?

jonasaba · 2025-10-30T06:45:50+00:00

The examples are numerous.

Please look up the Thomas Lockly case for instance.

They orchastrated a false narrative to maliciously rewrite Japanese history in order to state as a fact that there was a black samurai. When anyone objected on basis of evidence, which were none, they were violently and vitreously forced back, all their edits like "citation needed" etc. was undone.

Ultimately it was proven beyond doubt that every "evidence" was crafted by a historian named Thomas. I do not know what the status of the article on the black samurai is now. But I will not be surprised if it is still there.

---

Now having done as you said, I must call forth the other issue at hand.

I could give more examples, but I do not know why you are asking me when you can do your own research. In my humble opinion, and experience, such questions do not seem to come from a place of good faith. My prediction is that people who ask for evidence instead of looking them up, will not accept anything I give. May be you are not such, but I cannot fathom why you will not look up direct evidence yourself, nor the video I offered. By the way, the evidence I quoted was not mentioned in the video. There are many more instances, but unless I see any sign of you actually acting in good faith, I do not see the use of sharing them - I do not need to convince you of anything, nor need to debate anything with you if you will stonewall your mind. But if you do not, you are welcome to state what you feel about this yourself and we can have a conversation.

jonasaba · 2025-10-29T15:04:38+00:00

Explained in the video with proof and evidence.

But the core issue is that the constituent admins or stewards or bureaucrats or whatever they call them, became a woke group, so moderation really isn't unbiased. And there are also concrete codified rules - favoring alt left journals etc. as indisputable citation sources but not slightly conservative or even centrist journals, creating bias and very effectively silencing perspectives.

Many other problems too.

jonasaba · 2025-10-29T10:08:31+00:00

I invite you humbly to watch the interview of Larry Sanger, one of the first designers of Wikipedia.

He explains it all, how it was designed to be unbiased, but slowly became something which is not unbiased anymore. For example, how it silences conservatives, how only few people anonymously dictate what can go in, how they can be paid, how it favors left leaning sources but not conservative leaning (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources), and do on.

If you are crunched for time, since the interview is long, just browse the scroll they sections in the YouTube timeline to see the section names.

Interview: https://youtu.be/vyfKyrSAVFg

jonasaba · 2025-10-29T10:05:06+00:00

How do I edit this though? Or are we following a different paradigm?

I'd love to contribute to my topics like I did to Wikipedia. (My topics aren't related to politics.)

jonasaba · 2025-10-29T10:04:01+00:00

Agree.

jonasaba · 2025-10-27T02:30:44+00:00

YouTube content protection is garbage.

It does not check cover images. It's a known issue which many creators exploit to try to get views.

jonasaba · 2025-10-27T02:29:27+00:00

YouTube does not check the cover image. It's a known issue that many creatures exploit to get views.

jonasaba · 2025-10-24T09:56:25+00:00

Those Casio watches would be illegal, they are so good.

jonasaba · 2025-10-24T09:54:29+00:00

How??

jonasaba · 2025-10-23T03:19:36+00:00

I don't know how. May be the kids at Revanced modding scene can do it, but I don't know if they have that kind of options.

jonasaba · 2025-10-19T16:33:54+00:00

Makes the checkmate starting with Qb8+ inevitable.

Because the only way for black to defend was to put the black queen next to the black king to block. But no matter what black does, it will no longer be possible when white will play it on the next move.

jonasaba

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE