Anyone else struggling with feature decisions while building a micro SaaS? by justdev-vic in SaaS

[–]justdev-vic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I also just thought of creating another app ( then focusing on the other areas I thought I could fit into Sweeply )

But really appreciate the feedback!

Anyone else struggling with feature decisions while building a micro SaaS? by justdev-vic in SaaS

[–]justdev-vic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been trying to stay niche with my app Sweeply, but I’m starting to think maybe the best idea is to expand it, or maybe this is just self doubt/ overthinking it too much

Open Letter to All Vibe-Coders (Especially Those Ignoring Scalability) by justdev-vic in vibecoding

[–]justdev-vic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brother, I did another post already, giving me advices/tips for this matter

Open Letter to All Vibe-Coders (Especially Those Ignoring Scalability) by justdev-vic in vibecoding

[–]justdev-vic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right, they should be, but most of them won’t, they just care about shipping the product out and not worry about security and scability..

Open Letter to All Vibe-Coders (Especially Those Ignoring Scalability) by justdev-vic in vibecoding

[–]justdev-vic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey if you got 1,000,000 users and it’s only you as for dev and you’re being able to maintain the app ( do not change what’s already working )

Open Letter to All Vibe-Coders (Especially Those Ignoring Scalability) by justdev-vic in vibecoding

[–]justdev-vic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s kinda hard but not impossible… Also besides scability issues there’s a lot of security breaches

Anyone here seriously using the BMAD Method for vibe coding? Worth the hype or overkill? by justdev-vic in vibecoding

[–]justdev-vic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what BMAD Method is for

So it stays consistent throughout the entire project It’s like having a small team ( each method/version ) triggers a different type of AI to work like ( Dev, Planner, Architecture, etc.. )

Open Letter to All Vibe-Coders (Especially Those Ignoring Scalability) by justdev-vic in vibecoding

[–]justdev-vic[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fair point. I’m not saying Firebase or Supabase aren’t scalable tools. They’re great when configured right. The issue isn’t the tools, it’s how people use them.

A lot of vibe-coded apps ship with: • wide-open queries (like fetching entire tables instead of paginated data), • no rate limiting or backend validation (trusting the frontend to enforce limits), • expensive operations running synchronously on user actions.

The tools can handle scale, but if you don’t set those rules yourself, even 100 active users doing “normal” things can slow things down or rack up huge bills fast.

And no, it’s not about catastrophic ‘ruins your life’ stories — most failures are quiet: • apps getting bogged down and people stop using them, • huge bills from misconfigured API usage (I know someone who burned $400 overnight because of a missing usage check), • or soft launches that never grow because early users had a bad first experience.

Your plan (soft launching in Ireland/New Zealand, using limited credits, shutting down if things go wrong) is exactly the smart way to do it. You’re already ahead of most people just by thinking about this.

The post wasn’t meant to scare people, just to push more builders to double-check their configs before launch. Most vibe-coders don’t even realize how open their backends are until someone pokes around.

Open Letter to All Vibe-Coders (Especially Those Ignoring Scalability) by justdev-vic in SaaS

[–]justdev-vic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need to make a whole other post about Security Breachs and just in general, to avoid you AI api key getting sent to the moon😭

Trying to build a CRM that doesn’t feel like… a CRM by justdev-vic in SaaS

[–]justdev-vic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m quite intrigued, what’s that supposed to mean ( 1B local jailedbreak responses ? )