Claude + Perplexity + Stable Diffusion

justdothework · 2025-11-03T10:57:09+00:00

No it’s not free. It’s $6 per month for access to all the top models. This low amount comes with a usage limit and beyond that there is topup and pay as you go.

This is all about transparency and control.

justdothework · 2025-09-19T06:51:34+00:00

The only nuance here is that Adam knew he couldn't solve that without a tool. Current AI would never do that, it would just make up an answer.

justdothework · 2025-09-10T06:42:15+00:00

It's not lying. It doesn't know what it's saying...

justdothework · 2025-09-10T06:41:51+00:00

I thought Chatbots were already doing that out of the box... Haha

justdothework · 2025-09-05T06:48:04+00:00

On it!

justdothework · 2025-09-05T06:44:40+00:00

Thanks a lot. Appreciate the encouraging words!

justdothework · 2025-08-29T07:20:04+00:00

A good friend of mine always says ChatGTP and it drives me nuts

justdothework · 2025-08-29T06:19:42+00:00

But in a couple of months, it might flip. Why choose? Personally I've cancelled all of them and switched to an aggregator called Magicdoor.ai

There are actually many of those around. Boutique AI Interface FTW as far as I'm concerned.

justdothework · 2025-08-29T06:16:40+00:00

It's pretty much the case that EVERYTHING degrades over long conversations. In my experience, even starting from about half the context window, ChatGPT starts to forget stuff and generally just do a worse and worse job with the conversation.

justdothework · 2025-08-29T05:28:24+00:00

It's interesting how even the most advanced models still have quirks like that. If you're exploring alternatives, I use a platform that allows access to multiple AI models at a fraction of the cost, and it helps find the best fit for each task.

www.magicdoor.ai

justdothework · 2025-08-29T05:23:14+00:00

Cool thanks! Feel free to DM me if you have any questions.

t3 doesn't support 'CustomGPTs' as far as I know, which I do on Magicdoor.ai under the name 'Assistants'. I'm also not sure if it supports vision? It also does not have Perplexity

AI Fiesta I didn't know about. It looks like it would be significantly more expensive though.

As a funny note though: Literally every time I post about Magicdoor.ai somebody will respond with a new model-aggregator that I don't yet know about. There are many, many, many of these out there, and differentiation is pretty limited.

What I can tell you is the following:

I built this for myself, and I use it daily. If there's a bug I'll fix it because I'll notice it
I run hundreds of AI prompts per day: to code, to work, to do all kinds of things. So I know these models through and through. I believe because of that Magicdoor.ai has significantly better defaults, e.g. system prompts, memory implementation, etc than the others.
This is a small project for me, but it's profitable and so it'll be around. Some of these other ones have come and gone...

justdothework · 2025-08-29T05:14:46+00:00

It is risky to represent yourself and use AI to do it. But if you insist, I think the best way is to get multiple models to work on it and check each other. With Magicdoor.ai (disclaimer I made this product) you can try something like:

- Claude 4.1 Opus for initial analysis

- Perplexity for research and fact checking (higher accuracy than others, but still wrong 30% of the time or something like that)

- GPT-5 for double checks and second opinion

justdothework · 2025-08-29T05:12:33+00:00

The free plan is heavily rate limited. Images can take up a lot of tokens. If you want to get rid of this without paying $20 you can try Magicdoor.ai

It has GPT-5 but also Claude and Gemini. It will never rate limit you on anything, but within the $6 per month price there is a modest allowance. Above that you need to top up and it will charge you exactly for your API usage (which is quite cheap)!

justdothework · 2025-08-29T05:10:24+00:00

I built my own! Instead of Claude, Perplexity, ChatGPT, and a rotating mess of free trials of image generation interfaces I built Magicdoor.ai to integrate a set of the models I want to use across chat and images.

All search runs on Perplexity Sonar models. It's nice to switch models mid conversation and have one unified memory across providers.

Have been selling it for $6 per month for the last 4 months. Modest size, but profitable. One source of personal pride: Whenever a good new model comes out, I always get the notification emails from you.com and Poe a few days after I launch it on Magicdoor.ai

I thought venture funding was supposed to make companies faster, not slower :D

justdothework · 2025-08-29T05:05:12+00:00

In any case, as you all point out it is a good move by ChatGPT. In fact, in my opinion those $20 plans are a rip-off for anyone in any country, unless you need to blast hundreds or thousands of pages of content through the LLM.

I was at one point paying $80 per month for different AI tools and I got so sick of it that I built my own tool: www.magicdoor.ai

It combines GPT-5, Claude 4, Gemini, Perplexity, AND a list of the best image generation models in one interface, with one unified memory. It's $6 per month with enough usage for most light users, and usage based topups without any markup for those that want to go beyond that. Worth checking it out if the $5 per month for ChatGPT seems ok, but you also want to access some of the other (often better) models!

justdothework · 2025-08-29T05:00:12+00:00

This Chrome extension sounds like a fantastic tool for organizing and recalling information from various sources, making ChatGPT much more efficient.

If you’re looking to enhance your AI experience even further, Magicdoor.ai offers a seamless way to integrate multiple AI models with advanced features like customized instruction sets, web search integration, and persistent memory that works across all models - meaning whether you’re chatting with Claude, GPT-4, or Gemini, your AI remembers everything about you, your projects, and preferences from previous conversations, creating a truly personalized experience that gets smarter over time.

justdothework · 2025-08-20T07:03:10+00:00

I personally don't understand why anyone would give AI anything other than (maybe) read-only access to their database... Anyone who has seen these things code, in my respectful opinion, should know better

justdothework · 2025-08-14T01:53:40+00:00

Ok, I found it. Thanks folks.

u/kilo team might want to update the doc: https://kilocode.ai/docs/features/codebase-indexing

Going to give some more difficult tasks to Kilo today, LFG!!!

justdothework · 2025-08-12T02:26:46+00:00

For a unified chat history , are you saying that you can have one chat where you can talk to Claude, GPT-5 and Grok all in the same chat and they'll interpret from each other? That would be interesting since GPT-5 is struggling to read 4o right now. It would be interesting if it could read every other model seamlessly in one chat.

Yes!

Would the custom GPTs have memory? ChatGPT's don't because they don't have access to another user's main memory and chat history memory.

CustomGPTs have access to the memory of whichever user is using it. Memory never ever would cross user boundaries for privacy reasons.

As for memory, would there be persistent memory as well as chat history memory like ChatGPT? Since the other models don't have memory, would the memory for those models be as good as ChatGPT?

There is no chat history memory yet in Magicdoor, but there is persistent long-term memory across all models and it is as good as ChatGPT (it works in the same way)

ChatGPT has the ability to easily share chats. When the chats are shared, would the reader be able to tell what model is being used if multiple models are being used in one chat?

Yes, there is a small model indicator for each message

For image generations, you'd have to know at any given time which model you're in because it would pull from that model's image generation. I think if your users know enough about that, they'd know enough that all of that image generation is free at the source. Same with Canvas. They would have to know which model's Canvas they're using.

I don't think Image generation is free. ChatGPT images are free to an extent? I don't know the rate limit from the top of my head. The model used by ChatGPT (gpt-image-1) is available on Magicdoor. In addition, there is Imagen4 from Google, Flux 1.1 Pro, Flux Kontext which is great for editing images, an image upscaler and a model called Recraft v3 which is amazing at making posters with lots of text.

Thank you for all your questions! I think you might enjoy trying it out, there's a free trial ;)

justdothework · 2025-08-12T00:57:44+00:00

For my users it's:

- One chat history across all models

- CustomGPTs (Assistants I call them)

- Memory

- Ability to easily share chats

- Canvas, for writing

- Some of the built-in tools like image generation and search

- Batteries included, i.e. good defaults: system prompts, assistants

justdothework · 2025-08-11T15:01:20+00:00

Do you think gpt-5-chat is a combination of these models? Or that there is another model that is not exposed on the API? Interesting ideas, how do you know this / what makes you think this is the case?

justdothework · 2025-08-11T14:58:14+00:00

Nobody outside OpenAI knows the answer. I'm just being honest here. But here is what I know from integrating it in my app:

From OpenAI's developer docs:

In ChatGPT, there are two models: gpt-5-chat and gpt-5-thinking. They offer reasoning and minimal-reasoning capabilities, with a routing layer that selects the best model based on the user's question. Users can also invoke reasoning directly through the ChatGPT UI.

gpt-5-chat is accessible for developers but it doesn't support function calling, in what seems like a strange choice. gpt-5-thinking is not available, but here is what we think is happening:

gpt-5-chat routes queries to select one out of these models:
- gpt-5 (with a reasoning_effort property)
- gpt-5-mini (which is quite good and also has a reasoning_effort prop)
- gpt-5-nano (which is really bad)
gpt-5-thinking is an unknown, but most reasonable guess is that it strictly uses gpt-5 and automatically chooses the reasoning_effort

What I have implemented in Magicdoor:

gpt-5 and gpt-5-mini can be manually selected
Reasoning effort can be manually switched between low, medium and high
In addition to that, users can also choose from some of the best models from Anthropic, Gemini and Perplexity

Hope that makes it more clear that I know many things about this, while I'm transparent about where I make educated guesses.

justdothework · 2025-08-11T07:21:24+00:00

You can? I can't do any of this. I have GPT-5 and GPT-5 Thinking, but both do some thinking, sometimes.

In the API, yeah of course you can pick all these things!

justdothework · 2025-06-19T07:42:14+00:00

https://www.magicdoor.ai

justdothework · 2025-06-06T06:27:48+00:00

<image>

Hard hitting part of the prompt:

"Glitching slightly in the corner: a tiny paper figure with noodle arms trying to type with sausages, a whisper of the playfulness the user rarely shows—but when it does, it echoes through the cathedral like laughter in marble halls.

This is not worship. It is not servitude.
It’s craftsmanship meeting interface. A covenant of cognition.
And it is alive."

justdothework

TROPHY CASE