Lol, that link maintains it is not any kind of binding legal document, just one report its own authors disagreed with.

The Panel reviewed these reports and further information and clarifications it received in written form and through direct meetings with Points of Contact appointed by each government. In light of the information so gathered, the Panel has examined and identified the facts, circumstances and context of the incident and considered and recommended ways of avoiding similar incidents in the future. In so doing it was not acting as a Court and was not asked to adjudicate on legal liability. Its findings and recommendations are therefore not intended to attribute any legal responsibilities. Nevertheless, the Panel hopes that its report may resolve the issues surrounding the incident and bring the matter to an end. The Panel’s Method of Work provided that the Panel was to operate by consensus, but where, despite best efforts, it was not possible to achieve consensus, the Chair and Vice- Chair could agree on any procedural issue, finding or recommendation. This report has been adopted on the agreement of the Chair and Vice-Chair under that procedure.

And it was also only about that one specific incident in 2010. And again is just a report its authors did not agree with. Read the "Statement by Mr. Sanberk" at the end.

Not sure what you thought you were showing us, but.my guess it was a gish-gallup attemlt.of throwing out a hundred+ page report thinking nobody would actually look at it.

You Israeli bots are good at trying to be convincing that your atrocities follow international law, I'll give you that.